Dosimetric evaluation of three-phase adaptive radiation therapy in head and neck cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Gul, Osman Vefa [1 ]
Buyukcizmeci, Nihal [2 ]
Basaran, Hamit [1 ]
机构
[1] Selcuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Konya, Turkiye
[2] Selcuk Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Phys, Konya, Turkiye
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Adaptive radiotherapy; Skin dose; Thermoluminescent dosimetry; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; ORGANS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110588
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the dosimetric benefits of the 3-phase adaptive radiation therapy (ART) technique for head and neck cancer (HNC). In addition, it was aimed to examine the changes in skin dose due to the anatomical changes that occurred in the patients during radiation therapy with Thermo -luminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Fifteen patients with head and neck cancer were included in this prospective study. TLDs were placed on the patient's neck at 5 different points determined during computed tomography (CT). A new CT was recommended for patients with a skin dose increase of more than 10% and a weight loss of more than 5% during treatment. Control CTs CT14 and CT24 were obtained in the patient due to weight loss and increase in skin dose. Offline adaptive replans were generated after fractions 14 and 24 and used for further processing (Aplan 1 and Aplan 2, respectively). All patients received 3-stage ART. Accordingly, iPlan Aplan1 and Aplan2 were applied between 0-14, 15-24 and 25-33 fractions, respectively. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were compared for adaptive (ART: iPlan + Aplan1+Aplan2) and non-adaptive (non-ART) plans. Lateral neck diameter (LND) change was statistically significant, with a decrease of 7.35% (p < 0.001) and 5.44% (p < 0.001) for CT14 and CT24, respectively. The mean weight loss for CT14 compared to CT0 was 7.80%. Weight loss in CT24 compared to CT14 was 5.65%. As a result of the measurements made with TLDs on different days between 0-15 fractions during the application of iPlan, a 15.25% increase in skin dose was measured. During Aplan 1 and Aplan 2 applications, the increase in skin dose was measured as 10.56% and 2.83%, respectively. For ART, the ipsilateral parotid and contralateral parotid Dmean doses were decreased by 1.62 Gy (p < 0.001) and 2.25 Gy (p < 0.001), respectively. During treatment, an increase in skin dose of more than 10% and a weight loss of more than 5% should be considered as a trigger point for initiation of ART. Repeat CT scanning and replanning after fractions 15 and 25 is recommended during intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with HNC. In conclusion, the 3-phase ART approach provides dosimetric benefits to patients with HNC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric Analysis of Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy in the Adjuvant Setting for Head and Neck Cancer
    All, S.
    Zhong, X.
    Choi, B.
    Kim, J. S.
    Zhuang, T.
    Avkshtol, V.
    Sher, D. J.
    Lin, M. H.
    Moon, D. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : S161 - S161
  • [2] DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF A THREE-PHASE ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY FOR NASOPHARYNGEAL CANCER USING HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY
    Fung, W. W. K.
    Wu, W. C. V.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S73 - S73
  • [3] Three-Phase Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Undergoing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetric Analysis
    Deng, Shan
    Liu, Xu
    Lu, Heming
    Huang, Huixian
    Shu, Liuyang
    Jiang, Hailan
    Cheng, Jinjian
    Peng, Luxing
    Pang, Qiang
    Gu, Junzhao
    Qin, Jian
    Lu, Zhiping
    Mo, Ying
    Wu, Danling
    Wei, Yinglin
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2017, 16 (06) : 910 - 916
  • [4] Three-Phase Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Undergoing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetric Analysis
    Liu, X.
    Lu, H.
    Huang, H.
    Shu, L.
    Jiang, H.
    Qin, J.
    Cheng, J.
    Peng, L.
    Deng, S.
    Pang, Q.
    Gu, J.
    Lu, Z.
    Mo, Y.
    Wu, D.
    Wei, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E692 - E692
  • [5] Dosimetric Variations Assessed with CBCT for Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Xue, J.
    Wang, H.
    Chen, T.
    Schiff, P. B.
    Das, I. J.
    Hu, K. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E541 - E542
  • [6] Dosimetric Evaluation of Trismus in Head and Neck Cancer Patients following Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy
    Rao, S. S.
    Saleh, Z. H.
    Fong, B. T.
    Setton, J.
    Caria, N.
    Romanyshyn, J.
    Wolden, S. A.
    Zelefsky, M. J.
    Deasy, J. O.
    Lee, N. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S75 - S76
  • [7] Prospective evaluation of dosimetric variables associated with brachial plexopathy after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer
    Guiou, M.
    Hall, W.
    Jennelle, R.
    Mathai, M.
    Purdy, J.
    Chen, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S385 - S385
  • [8] Dosimetric impact of adaptive proton therapy in head and neck cancer-A review
    Huiskes, Merle
    Astreinidou, Eleftheria
    Kong, Wens
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Heijmen, Ben
    Rasch, Coen
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 39
  • [9] A Comparative Dosimetric Analysis by Delivery of Adaptive Radiation Therapy in Locally-Advanced Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Dewan, A.
    Sharma, S. K.
    Kumar, A.
    Dewan, R.
    Sinha, S. N.
    Rawat, S.
    Kakria, A.
    Sharma, M. K.
    Chauhan, D.
    Chaudhary, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S438 - S438
  • [10] DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION FOR ADAPTIVE IMRT FOR HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER
    Tsuji, Stuart Y.
    Hwang, Andrew
    Weinberg, Vivian
    Yom, Sue S.
    Quivey, Jeanne M.
    Xia, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (03): : 707 - 714