Optimizing quantum gates towards the scale of logical qubits

被引:6
|
作者
Klimov, Paul V. [1 ]
Bengtsson, Andreas [1 ]
Quintana, Chris [1 ]
Bourassa, Alexandre [1 ]
Hong, Sabrina [1 ]
Dunsworth, Andrew [1 ]
Satzinger, Kevin J. [1 ]
Livingston, William P. [1 ]
Sivak, Volodymyr [1 ]
Niu, Murphy Yuezhen [1 ]
Andersen, Trond I. [1 ]
Zhang, Yaxing [1 ]
Chik, Desmond [1 ]
Chen, Zijun [1 ]
Neill, Charles [1 ]
Erickson, Catherine [1 ]
Dau, Alejandro Grajales [1 ]
Megrant, Anthony [1 ]
Roushan, Pedram [1 ]
Korotkov, Alexander N. [1 ,2 ]
Kelly, Julian [1 ]
Smelyanskiy, Vadim [1 ]
Chen, Yu [1 ]
Neven, Hartmut [1 ]
机构
[1] Google AI, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
[2] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Riverside, CA USA
关键词
SUPREMACY; EMISSION;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-024-46623-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A foundational assumption of quantum error correction theory is that quantum gates can be scaled to large processors without exceeding the error-threshold for fault tolerance. Two major challenges that could become fundamental roadblocks are manufacturing high-performance quantum hardware and engineering a control system that can reach its performance limits. The control challenge of scaling quantum gates from small to large processors without degrading performance often maps to non-convex, high-constraint, and time-dynamic control optimization over an exponentially expanding configuration space. Here we report on a control optimization strategy that can scalably overcome the complexity of such problems. We demonstrate it by choreographing the frequency trajectories of 68 frequency-tunable superconducting qubits to execute single- and two-qubit gates while mitigating computational errors. When combined with a comprehensive model of physical errors across our processor, the strategy suppresses physical error rates by similar to 3.7x compared with the case of no optimization. Furthermore, it is projected to achieve a similar performance advantage on a distance-23 surface code logical qubit with 1057 physical qubits. Our control optimization strategy solves a generic scaling challenge in a way that can be adapted to a variety of quantum operations, algorithms, and computing architectures.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimizing quantum gates towards the scale of logical qubits
    Paul V. Klimov
    Andreas Bengtsson
    Chris Quintana
    Alexandre Bourassa
    Sabrina Hong
    Andrew Dunsworth
    Kevin J. Satzinger
    William P. Livingston
    Volodymyr Sivak
    Murphy Yuezhen Niu
    Trond I. Andersen
    Yaxing Zhang
    Desmond Chik
    Zijun Chen
    Charles Neill
    Catherine Erickson
    Alejandro Grajales Dau
    Anthony Megrant
    Pedram Roushan
    Alexander N. Korotkov
    Julian Kelly
    Vadim Smelyanskiy
    Yu Chen
    Hartmut Neven
    Nature Communications, 15
  • [2] Quantum entanglement and controlled logical gates using coupled SQUID flux qubits
    Zhou, ZY
    Chu, SI
    Han, SY
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2005, 15 (02) : 833 - 836
  • [3] SQUID qubits and quantum gates
    Han, SY
    Rouse, R
    DECOHERENCE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS IN QUANTUM COMPUTATION AND INFORMATION TRANSFER, 2001, 182 : 317 - 328
  • [4] Towards a universal set of topologically protected gates for quantum computation with Pfaffian qubits
    Georgiev, Lachezar S.
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 2008, 789 (03) : 552 - 590
  • [5] Geometric quantum gates with superconducting qubits
    Kamleitner, I.
    Solinas, P.
    Mueller, C.
    Shnirman, A.
    Mottonen, M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2011, 83 (21):
  • [6] Optimal quantum gates for semiconductor qubits
    Hohenester, Ulrich
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2006, 74 (16)
  • [7] Molecules as qubits, qudits and quantum gates
    Moreno-Pineda, Eufemio
    Martins, Daniel O. T. A.
    Tuna, Floriana
    Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, 2021, 27 : 146 - 187
  • [8] Quantum logical operations on encoded qubits
    Zurek, WH
    Laflamme, R
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1996, 77 (22) : 4683 - 4686
  • [9] Programmable quantum motherboard for logical qubits
    Perminov, N. S.
    Tarankova, D. Y.
    Moiseev, S. A.
    LASER PHYSICS, 2019, 29 (12)
  • [10] NOT and CNOT gates for photon logical qubits on different frequency states
    Akbari, M.
    Andrianov, S. N.
    Kalachev, A. A.
    XIX INTERNATIONAL YOUTH SCHOOL ON COHERENT OPTICS AND OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY, 2016, 714