The completely patient-reported version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score: A valid and reliable measurement for ankle osteoarthritis

被引:7
|
作者
Paget, Liam D. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,8 ]
Sierevelt, Inger N. [4 ,5 ]
Tol, Johannes L. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Reurink, Gustaaf [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Orthoped Surg, Amsterdam Movement Sci, POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Ctr Evidence Based Sports Med ACES, POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] AMC VUmc IOC Res Ctr, Amsterdam Collaborat Hlth & Safety Sports ACHSS, POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Spaarne Ziekenhuis, Spaarne Gasthuis Acad, Orthoped Dept, NL-2134 TM Hoofddorp, Netherlands
[5] Xpert Clin, Specialised Ctr Orthoped Res & Educ Stichting SCOR, Orthoped Dept, NL-2134 TM Hoofddorp, Netherlands
[6] Aspetar, Orthoped & Sports Med Hosp, POB 29222, Doha, Qatar
[7] OLVG, Sports Phys Grp, Dept Sports Med, NL-1061 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Amsterdam UMC, Dept Orthopaed, POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Ankle; Ankle osteoarthritis; Clinimetrics; Orthopaedic surgery; Sports medicine; CLINICAL RATING SYSTEMS; DUTCH LANGUAGE VERSION; FUNCTION INDEX; RESPONSIVENESS; RELIABILITY; HINDFOOT; SF-36; TRANSLATION; COEFFICIENT; COSMIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jisako.2023.07.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle score (AOFAS) is an outcome measure for ankle and hindfoot conditions, which requires scoring from both the patients and the physician. A completely patientreported version has been developed and used before, but its measurements properties are unknown. Our goal was to determine the measurement properties and the minimally important change (MIC) of a completely patientreported AOFAS (PR-AOFAS) in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. Additionally, the MIC of both the PR-AOFAS and the AOFAS was estimated, which had not previously been done.Materials and methods: The PR-AOFAS of 112 patients was evaluated for reliability, construct validity (using the AOFAS, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Ankle Osteoarthritis Score, Visual Analogue Scale, and Short Form-36), and responsiveness. The MIC was estimated using the optimal cut-off point of the receiver operating characteristic curve. This was a substudy of a randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injections for ankle osteoarthritis (OA).Results: The PR-AOFAS had sufficient construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. The smallest detectable change at group level was 2.34. The MIC was 6.5 points (95% confidence interval: 0.6-14.4).Conclusions: The measurement properties of the Dutch PR-AOFAS were sufficient in patients with ankle osteoarthritis who are willing to participate in a trial on injection therapy. The minimally important change of the PRAOFAS is smaller than its smallest detectable change, making it more suitable for use in groups of patients, such as a research setting. Level of clinical evidence: 1.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 351
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Structural validity of the foot and ankle outcome score for orthopaedic pathologies with Rasch Measurement Theory
    Tapaninaho, Krista
    Saarinen, Antti J.
    Ilves, Outi
    Uimonen, Mikko M.
    Hakkinen, Arja H.
    Sandelin, Henrik
    Repo, Jussi P.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 28 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [32] Validity and Reliability of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Score for the English-Literate Singapore Population With Hallux Valgus
    Tan, Chin Chuen
    Sayampanathan, Andrew Arjun
    Kwan, Yu Heng
    Yeo, William
    Rikhraj, Inderjeet Singh
    Yeo, Nicholas Eng Meng
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2024, 17 (04) : 329 - 335
  • [33] Preoperative Anxiety Effect on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Foot and Ankle Surgery
    Nixon, Devon C.
    Schafer, Kevin A.
    Cusworth, Brian
    McCormick, Jeremy J.
    Johnson, Jeffery E.
    Klein, Sandra E.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 40 (09) : 1007 - 1011
  • [34] Reliability, validity and clinical applicability of the German version of the European Foot and Ankle Society Score
    Krueger, Lara
    Rolvien, Tim
    Seller, Marcel
    Hubert, Jan
    Beil, Frank Timo
    Strahl, Andre
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 28 (08) : 1307 - 1313
  • [35] Guidelines for diabetic foot care: Recommendations endorsed by the Diabetes Committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society
    Pinzur, MS
    Slovenkai, MP
    Trepman, E
    Shields, NN
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 26 (01) : 113 - 119
  • [36] EFAS Score-Validation of Persian Version by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS)
    Richter, Martinus
    Agren, Per-Henrik
    Besse, Jean-Luc
    Coester, Maria
    Kofoed, Hakon
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Steultjens, Martijn
    Vosoughi, Amir Reza
    Bahari, Milad
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2021, 27 (05) : 496 - 500
  • [37] EFAS Score- Validation of Portuguese Version by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS)
    Richter, Martinus
    Agren, Per-Henrik
    Besse, Jdan-Luc
    Coester, Maria
    Kofoed, Hakon
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Steultjens, Martijn
    Corte-Real, Nuno
    Dias, Rafael
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 28 (06) : 709 - 713
  • [38] Contemporary Review: An Overview of the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in Foot and Ankle Surgery
    Czerwonka, Natalia
    Desai, Sohil S.
    Arciero, Emily
    Greisberg, Justin
    Trofa, David P.
    Chien, Bonnie Y.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 44 (06) : 554 - 564
  • [39] Validity of five foot and ankle specific electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) instruments in patients undergoing elective orthopedic foot or ankle surgery
    Uimonen, Mikko M.
    Ponkilainen, Ville T.
    Toom, Alar
    Miettinen, Mikko
    Hakkinen, Arja H.
    Sandelin, Henrik
    Latvala, Antti O.
    Sirola, Timo
    Sampo, Mika
    Roine, Risto P.
    Lindahl, Jan
    Ilves, Outi
    Sandbacka, Anna
    Repo, Jussi P.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2021, 27 (01) : 52 - 59
  • [40] Assessment of the structural validity of three foot and ankle specific patient-reported outcome measures
    Ponkilainen, Ville T.
    Tukiainen, Erkki J.
    Uimonen, Mikko M.
    Hakkinen, Arja H.
    Repo, Jussi P.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (02) : 169 - 174