A Decision-Support Tool to Augment Global Mountain Protection and Conservation, including a Case Study from Western Himalaya

被引:1
|
作者
Jacobs, Peter [1 ]
Carbutt, Clinton [2 ,3 ]
Beever, Erik A. A. [4 ,5 ]
Foggin, J. Marc [6 ,7 ]
Martin, Madeline [8 ]
Orchard, Shane [9 ,10 ]
Sayre, Roger [11 ]
机构
[1] IUCN WCPA Mt Specialist Grp, Bright, Vic 3741, Australia
[2] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Life Sci, ZA-3209 Scottsville, South Africa
[3] Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, Sci Serv, ZA-3202 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[4] Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, US Geol Survey, Bozeman, MT 59715 USA
[5] Montana State Univ, Dept Ecol, Bozeman, MT 59715 USA
[6] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[7] Univ British Columbia, Inst Asian Res, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
[8] US Geol Survey, Climate Res & Dev Program, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[9] Univ Canterbury, Sch Earth & Environm, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
[10] Univ Canterbury, Sch Biol Sci, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
[11] US Geol Survey, Land Change Sci Program, Reston, VA 20192 USA
关键词
biodiversity hotspots; decision-support tool; ecosystem services; global mountain priorities; Key Biodiversity Areas; mountain biodiversity; mountain protected and conserved areas; western Himalaya; world ecosystems; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SYSTEMS; HABITAT; FUTURE; MATTER; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/land12071323
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mountains are remarkable storehouses of global biodiversity that provide a broad range of ecosystem services underpinning billions of livelihoods. The world's network of protected areas includes many iconic mountain landscapes. However, only ca. 19% of mountain areas globally are protected (excluding Antarctica); many mountain areas are inadequately (<30% of their total terrestrial area) or completely unprotected. To support the UN Convention on Biological Diversity's Global Biodiversity Framework goal of protecting at least 30% of the world's lands by 2030, we have developed a strategic decision-support tool for identifying and prioritizing which candidate mountain areas most urgently require protection. To test its efficacy, we applied the tool to the Western Himalaya Case Study Area (WHCSA). The six-step algorithm harnesses multiple datasets including mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), World Terrestrial Ecosystems, Biodiversity Hotspots, and Red List species and ecosystems. It also makes use of other key attributes including opportunities for disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation, developing mountain tourism, maintaining elevational gradients and natural ecological corridors, and conserving flagship species. This method resulted in nine categories of potential action-four categories for follow-up action (ranked by order of importance and priority), and five categories requiring no further immediate action (either because countries are inadequately equipped to respond to protection deficits or because their KBAs are deemed adequately protected). An area-based analysis of the WHCSA identified 33 mountain KBAs regarded as inadequately protected, which included 29 inadequately protected World Mountain Ecosystems. All 33 inadequately protected KBAs in the WHCSA are Category A1: first-priority mountain KBAs (located in the Himalaya Biodiversity Hotspot in developing countries), requiring the most urgent attention for protection and conservation. Priorities for action can be fine-filtered by regional teams with sufficient local knowledge and country-specific values to finalize lists of priority mountain areas for protection. This rapid assessment tool ensures a repeatable, unbiased, and scientifically credible method for allocating resources and priorities to safeguard the world's most biodiverse mountain areas facing myriad threats in the Anthropocene.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Soil, water and nutrient conservation in mountain farming systems: Case-study from the Sikkim Himalaya
    Sharma, E
    Rai, SC
    Sharma, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2001, 61 (02) : 123 - 135
  • [2] Building a decision-support tool to inform sustainability approaches under complexity: Case study on managing wild ruminants
    Griesberger, Paul
    Kunz, Florian
    Hacklaender, Klaus
    Mattsson, Brady
    [J]. AMBIO, 2024, 53 (09) : 1307 - 1322
  • [3] Lessons learned from using a decision-support tool for precision placement of conservation practices in six agricultural watersheds in the US midwest
    Ranjan, Pranay
    Singh, Ajay S.
    Tomer, Mark D.
    Lewandowski, Ann M.
    Prokopy, Linda S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 239 : 57 - 65
  • [4] Development of a cost-effective diversity-maximising decision-support tool for in situ crop genetic resources conservation: The case of cacao
    Samuel, Aurelia F.
    Drucker, Adam G.
    Andersen, Sven B.
    Simianer, Henner
    van Zonneveld, Maarten
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 96 : 155 - 164
  • [5] Optimal Routing of Gas Pipelines in Seismic Regions Using an Efficient Decision-Support Tool: A Case Study in Northern Greece
    Makrakis, Nikolaos
    Psarropoulos, Prodromos N.
    Tsompanakis, Yiannis
    [J]. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2024, 14 (23):
  • [6] Insights on the Use of Decision-Support Tools to Sustain Forest Ecosystems from a Case Study in Pennsylvania, USA
    Rittenhouse, Joshua
    Leites, Laura
    Derham, Kelly
    Miller, Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2018, 116 (04) : 391 - 395
  • [7] Managing Choice Uncertainties in Life-Cycle Assessment as a Decision-Support Tool for Building Design: A Case Study on Building Framework
    Ylmen, Peter
    Berlin, Johanna
    Mjornell, Kristina
    Arfvidsson, Jesper
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [8] Mobility service design with equity-aware choice-based decision-support tool: New York case study
    Ren, Xiyuan
    Chow, Joseph Y. J.
    Guan, Chenghe
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 132
  • [9] ENGAGING TOURISM STAKEHOLDERS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE DECISION-SUPPORT TOOLS: A CASE STUDY FROM MICHIGAN, USA
    Nicholls, Sarah
    Holecek, Donald F.
    [J]. TOURISM REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 12 (01): : 25 - 42
  • [10] Decision Support Tool for Manufacturing Execution Systems: Case Study from the Steel Industry
    Aramja, Adil
    Kamach, Oualid
    [J]. ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (AI2SD'2020), VOL 1, 2022, 1417 : 411 - 426