A multi-criteria decision-making approach to vulnerability assessment of rural flooding in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan

被引:7
|
作者
Khan, Abid [1 ]
Gong, Zaiwu [1 ]
Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad [2 ]
Haq, Mirajul [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Abdul Wali Khan Univ, Dept Math, Mardan, Pakistan
关键词
Vulnerability assessment; MCDM; TOPSIS; Entropy weight method; Rural flooding; Disaster risk management; Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RISK-ASSESSMENT; DISASTER RISK; URBAN COMMUNITIES; INDEX; TOPSIS; ADAPTATION; HAZARDS; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-25609-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Assessment of rural regions' vulnerability to flooding is gaining prominence on a global scale. However, researchers are greatly undermined in their efforts to make a comprehensive assessment owing to the multidimensional and non-linear link between different indicators and flood risk. Thus, a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach is proposed to assess the multifaceted vulnerability of rural flooding in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. This research presents a hybrid model for flood vulnerability assessment by combining TOPSIS and the entropy weight method. Households' vulnerability to flooding in rural areas is assessed through four components (social, economic, physical, and institutional) and twenty indicators. All indicator weights are derived using the entropy weight method. The TOPSIS method is then used to rank the selected research areas based on their flood vulnerability levels. The ranking results reveal that flood vulnerability is highest in the Nowshehra District, followed by the Charsadda, Peshawar, and D.I. Khan Districts. The weighting results show that physical vulnerability is the most important component, while location of household's house from the river source (< 1 km) is the key indicator for assessing flood vulnerability. A sensitivity analysis is provided to study the impact of indicator's weights on the comprehensive ranking results. The sensitivity results revealed that out of twenty indicators, fourteen indicators had the lowest sensitivity, three indicators were reported with low sensitivity while the other three were considered highly sensitive for flood vulnerability assessment. Our research has the potential to offer policymakers specific guidelines for lowering flood risk in flood-prone areas.
引用
收藏
页码:56786 / 56801
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-criteria decision-making approach to vulnerability assessment of rural flooding in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan
    Abid Khan
    Zaiwu Gong
    Ashfaq Ahmad Shah
    Mirajul Haq
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 56786 - 56801
  • [2] GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Approach for Flood Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping in District Shangla: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
    Hussain, Muhammad
    Tayyab, Muhammad
    Zhang, Jiquan
    Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad
    Ullah, Kashif
    Mehmood, Ummer
    Al-Shaibah, Bazel
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [3] Flood vulnerability assessment using an integrated approach of multi-criteria decision-making model and geospatial techniques
    Vignesh, K. S.
    Anandakumar, I
    Ranjan, Rajeev
    Borah, Debashree
    [J]. MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 7 (02) : 767 - 781
  • [4] Noise vulnerability assessment using an integrated approach of multi-criteria decision-making model and geospatial techniques
    Pahari, S.
    Das Chatterjee, N.
    Barman, N. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21 (06) : 5421 - 5436
  • [5] Noise vulnerability assessment using an integrated approach of multi-criteria decision-making model and geospatial techniques
    S. Pahari
    N. Das Chatterjee
    N. K. Barman
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2024, 21 : 5421 - 5436
  • [6] Flood vulnerability assessment using an integrated approach of multi-criteria decision-making model and geospatial techniques
    K. S. Vignesh
    I. Anandakumar
    Rajeev Ranjan
    Debashree Borah
    [J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2021, 7 : 767 - 781
  • [7] Multi-criteria group decision-making approach with linguistic assessment information
    School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    [J]. Kongzhi yu Juece Control Decis, 2007, 5 (545-548+553):
  • [8] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [9] Multi-Criteria Decision Making for the Assessment of Coastal Flood Vulnerability
    Boulomytis, V. T. G.
    Zuffo, A. C.
    Gireli, T. Z.
    [J]. WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2015: FLOODS, DROUGHTS, AND ECOSYSTEMS, 2015, : 1248 - 1255
  • [10] Modified approach to PROMETHEE for multi-criteria decision-making
    Radojicic, Miroslav
    Zizovic, Malisa
    Nesic, Zoran
    Vasovic, Jasmina Vesic
    [J]. MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 7 (03) : 408 - 421