Antibiotic resistance profile of wastewater treatment plants in Brazil reveals different patterns of resistance and multi resistant bacteria in final effluents

被引:11
|
作者
Machado, Elayne Cristina [1 ]
Freitas, Deborah Leroy [1 ]
Leal, Cintia Dutra [1 ]
de Oliveira, Amanda Teodoro [1 ]
Zerbini, Adriana [1 ]
Chernicharo, Carlos Augusto [1 ]
de Araujo, Juliana Calabria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Sanit & Environm Engn, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Antibiotic resistant bacteria; Antibiotic resistance gene; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Municipal wastewater; WWTP; Multi-drug resistance (MDR) phenotype; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIA; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; GENES; SEWAGE; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; RESIDUES; FATE; ENVIRONMENT; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159376
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are recognized as important sources of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria (ARBs) and Antibiotic Resistant Genes (ARGs), and might play a role in the removal and dissemination of antimicrobial resis-tance (AMR) in the environment. Detailed information about AMR removal by the different treatment technologies commonly applied in urban WWTPs is needed. This study investigated the occurrence, removal and characterization of ARBs in WWTPs employing different technologies: WWTP-A (conventional activated sludge-CAS), WWTP-B (UASB reactor followed by biological trickling filter) and WWTP-C (modified activated sludge followed by UV disinfection-MAS/UV). Samples of raw sewage (RI) and treated effluent (TE) were collected and, through the cultivation-based method using 11 antibiotics, the antibiotic resistance profiles were characterized in a one-year period. MAS was effec-tive in reducing ARB counts (2 to 3 log units), compared to CAS (1 log unit) and UASB/BTF (0.5 log unit). The com-position of cultivable ARB differed between RI and TE samples. Escherichia was predominant in RI (56/118); whilst in TE Escherichia (31/118) was followed by Bacillus (22/118), Shigella (14/118) and Enterococcus (14/118). Most of the isolates identified (370/394) harboured at least two ARGs and in over 80 % of the isolates, 4 or more ARG (int1, blaTEM, TetA, sul1 and qnrB) were detected. A reduction in the resistance prevalence was observed in effluents after CAS and MAS processes; whilst a slight increase was observed in treated effluents from UASB/BTF and after UV disinfection stage. The multi-drug resistance (MDR) phenotype was attributed to 84.3 % of the isolates from RI (27/32) and 63.6 % from TE (21/33) samples and 52.3 % of the isolates (34/65) were resistant to carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem). The results indicate that treated effluents are still a source for MDR bacteria and ARGs dis-semination to aquatic environments. The importance of biological sewage treatment was reinforced by the significant reductions in ARB counts observed. However, implementation of additional treatments is needed to mitigate MDR bac-teria release into the environment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Antibiotic resistance profile of wastewater treatment plants in Brazil reveals different patterns of resistance and multi resistant bacteria in final effluents
    Machado, Elayne Cristina
    Freitas, Deborah Leroy
    Leal, Cintia Dutra
    de Oliveira, Amanda Teodoro
    Zerbini, Adriana
    Chernicharo, Carlos Augusto
    de Araujo, Juliana Calabria
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 857
  • [2] Role of different wastewater treatment plants in antibiotic resistance spreading
    Bonetta, S.
    Pignata, C.
    Bonetta, Sa
    Gasparro, E.
    Lorenzi, E.
    De Ceglia, M.
    Gilli, G.
    Carraro, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [3] Performance of full-scale rural wastewater treatment plants in the reduction of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes from small-city effluents
    Leiva, Ana Maria
    Gomez, Gloria
    Gonzalez-Rocha, Gerardo
    Pina, Benjamin
    Vidal, Gladys
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (02):
  • [4] Removal of antibiotic resistant bacteria in wastewater treatment plants
    Ilmi, Akna Mumtaz
    Adiba, Farah
    Anisah, Kirana
    Awaliyah, Ananda Rabiatul
    Heruputri, Nindya Vidiasty
    Kasuga, Ikuro
    Priadi, Cindy Rianti
    Rahmatika, Iftita
    7TH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, ETMC 2023, 2024, 485
  • [5] Technologies in wastewater treatment plants for the removal of antibiotics, resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes: A review of the current literature*
    Zapata-Zúñiga, Maria Camila
    Parra-Pérez, Miguel Ángel
    Álvarez-Berrio, Johan Alexander
    Molina-Gómez, Nidia Isabel
    Ingenieria y Universidad, 2022, 26
  • [6] Fate of antibiotic resistant cultivable heterotrophic bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes in wastewater treatment processes
    Zhang, Songhe
    Han, Bing
    Gu, Ju
    Wang, Chao
    Wang, Peifang
    Ma, Yanyan
    Cao, Jiashun
    He, Zhenli
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2015, 135 : 138 - 145
  • [7] Distribution of antibiotic resistance in the effluents of ten municipal wastewater treatment plants in China and the effect of treatment processes
    Ben, Weiwei
    Wang, Jian
    Cao, Rukun
    Yang, Min
    Zhang, Yu
    Qiang, Zhimin
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2017, 172 : 392 - 398
  • [8] Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Bacteria Isolated from Wastewater Treatment Plants and Urban Stream of Ganges River in Northern India
    Pal, Arun Kumar
    Tripathi, Pooja
    Lal, Jonathan A.
    Tripathi, Vijay
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2024, 235 (08):
  • [9] Ultraviolet Disinfection of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria and Their Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Water and Wastewater
    McKinney, Chad W.
    Pruden, Amy
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (24) : 13393 - 13400
  • [10] Enrichment of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance Genes by Sulfamethoxazole in the Biological Treatment System of Mariculture Wastewater
    Wang J.-P.
    Zhao Y.-G.
    Hu Y.-B.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2021, 42 (08): : 3791 - 3798