Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations

被引:2
|
作者
Rosslenbroich, Steffen B. [1 ]
Achtnich, Andrea [2 ]
Brodkorb, Cathrin [1 ]
Koesters, Clemens [3 ]
Kreis, Carolin [1 ]
Metzlaff, Sebastian [4 ]
Schliemann, Benedikt [5 ]
Petersen, Wolf [6 ]
机构
[1] Westfalian Wilhelms Univ, Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Trauma Hand & Reconstruct Surg, Waldeyerstr 1, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] TU Tech Univ Munich, Dept Orthoped Sports Med, Klinikum Rechts Isar, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[3] Maria & Joseph Hosp Greven, Dept Trauma Surg & Orthoped, D-48268 Greven, Germany
[4] St Joseph Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, D-12101 Berlin, Germany
[5] Herz Jesu Hosp, Dept Trauma Hand & Reconstruct Surg, D-48165 Munster, Germany
[6] Martin Luther Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, D-14193 Berlin, Germany
关键词
ACL repair; Kessler-Bunnell suture; ACL rupture; knotless anchor; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; 6-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; HEALING RESPONSE; RECONSTRUCTION; INJURY; SURGERY; PATIENT; RISK; TEAR; OSTEOARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12062340
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Several suture techniques have been described in the past for direct ACL repair with poor healing capacity and a high re-rupture rate. Therefore, we investigated a refixation technique for acute primary proximal ACL repair. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical properties of different suture configurations using a knotless anchor. Methods: In this study, 35 fresh-frozen porcine knees underwent proximal ACL refixation. First, in 10 porcine femora, the biomechanical properties of the knotless anchor, without the ligament attached, were tested. Then, three different suture configurations were evaluated to reattach the remaining ACL. Using a material testing machine, the structural properties were evaluated for cyclic loading followed by loading to failure. Results: The ultimate failure load of the knotless anchor was 198, 76 N +/- 23, 4 N significantly higher than all of the tested ACL suture configurations. Comparing the different configurations, the modified Kessler-Bunnell suture showed significant superior ultimate failure load, with 81, 2 N +/- 15, 6 N compared to the twofold and single sutures (50, 5 N +/- 14 N and 37, 5 +/- 3, 8 N). In cyclic loading, there was no significant difference noted for the different configurations in terms of stiffness and elongation. Conclusions: The results of this in vitro study show that when performing ACL suture using a knotless anchor, a modified Kessler-Bunnell suture provides superior biomechanical properties than a single and a twofold suture. Within this construct, no failure at the bone-anchor interface was seen.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: An anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations
    Cole, Brian J.
    ElAttrache, Neal S.
    Anbari, Ammar
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (06): : 662 - 669
  • [2] The strength of suture configurations in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    White, Clive D.
    Bunker, Timothy D.
    Hooper, Robert M.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (08): : 837 - 841
  • [3] Biomechanical evaluation of different suture materials for arthroscopic transtibial pull-out repair of posterior meniscus root tears
    Matthias J. Feucht
    Eduardo Grande
    Johannes Brunhuber
    Nikolaus Rosenstiel
    Rainer Burgkart
    Andreas B. Imhoff
    Sepp Braun
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2015, 23 : 132 - 139
  • [4] Biomechanical evaluation of different suture materials for arthroscopic transtibial pull-out repair of posterior meniscus root tears
    Feucht, Matthias J.
    Grande, Eduardo
    Brunhuber, Johannes
    Rosenstiel, Nikolaus
    Burgkart, Rainer
    Imhoff, Andreas B.
    Braun, Sepp
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2015, 23 (01) : 132 - 139
  • [5] Is Primary Arthroscopic Repair Using the Pulley Technique an Effective Treatment for Partial Proximal ACL Tears?
    Liao, Weixiong
    Zhang, Qiang
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 478 (05) : 1031 - 1045
  • [6] Biomechanical Evaluation of Proximal Hamstring Repair: All-Suture Anchor Versus Titanium Suture Anchor
    Otto, Alexander
    DiCosmo, Alyssa M.
    Baldino, Joshua B.
    Mehl, Julian
    Obopilwe, Elifho
    Cote, Mark P.
    Imhoff, Andreas B.
    Beitzel, Knut
    Mazzocca, Augustus D.
    Coyner, Katherine
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [7] Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Suture Techniques for Arthroscopic Transtibial Pull-out Repair of Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears
    Feucht, Matthias J.
    Grande, Eduardo
    Brunhuber, Johannes
    Burgkart, Rainer
    Imhoff, Andreas B.
    Braun, Sepp
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (12): : 2784 - 2790
  • [8] Biomechanical analysis of four different medial row configurations of suture bridge rotator cuff repair
    Senju, Takahiro
    Okada, Takamitsu
    Takeuchi, Naohide
    Kozono, Naoya
    Nakanishi, Yoshitaka
    Higaki, Hidehiko
    Shimoto, Takeshi
    Nakashima, Yasuharu
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2019, 69 : 191 - 196
  • [9] Biomechanical comparison of traditional and locked suture configurations for arthroscopic repairs of the rotator cuff
    Koganti, Anil K.
    Adamson, Gregory J.
    Gregersen, Colin S.
    Pink, Marilyn M.
    Shankwiler, James A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (11): : 1832 - 1838
  • [10] Biomechanical Evaluation of Knotless and Knotted All-Suture Anchor Repair Constructs in 4 Bankart Repair Configurations
    Lacheta, Lucca
    Brady, Alex
    Rosenberg, Samuel I.
    Dornan, Grant J.
    Dekker, Travis J.
    Anderson, Nicole
    Altintas, Burak
    Krob, Joseph J.
    Millett, Peter J.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (06): : 1523 - 1532