Evaluation of the different exposure parameters for the accurate diagnosis of peri-implantitis severity in digital panoramic radiography

被引:1
|
作者
Sadik, Elif [1 ]
Gokmenoglu, Ceren [2 ]
Altun, Gokcen [3 ]
Kara, Cankat [2 ]
机构
[1] Ordu Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Fac Dent, TR-52200 Ordu, Turkiye
[2] Ordu Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Periodontol, Ordu, Turkiye
[3] Bartin Univ, Dept Informat Syst & Technol, Fac Sci, Bartin, Turkiye
来源
关键词
Dental implant; panoramic radiography; peri-implantitis; diagnosis; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; IN-VITRO EVALUATION; DOSE REDUCTION; PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BONE DEFECTS; RADIOLUCENCIES; DENSITY;
D O I
10.4317/medoral.25501
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: To evaluate the accuracy of the diagnosis of peri-implant bone defects' severities in digital pan-oramic radiographs obtained at different tube voltage and/or tube current settings. Material and Methods: Two different sizes of peri-implant bone defects (type 1 and type 2) were prepared after the implants were inserted into 29 bovine rib blocks. Digital panoramic radiographs were obtained at eight different tube voltage and/or tube current settings for all rib blocks. Implant images were cropped separately. The average intensity value (AIV) of cropped images were analyzed using Adobe Photoshop CC software. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare AIVs. All cropped images were evaluated using a five-point Likert scale for the likeli-hood of a bone defect being absent or present. The weighted kappa values were calculated to compare observer agreement and ROC analysis was performed to determine the appropriate exposure parameters. Results: The lowest AIV was obtained at 72 kV/6.3 mA (92.162 +/- 16.016), and the highest AIV was obtained at 60 kV/3.2 mA (179.050 +/- 13.823). The Kruskal-Wallis H test showed significant differences in the AIVs according to the exposure parameters (p<0.001). The kappa coefficient for the inter-observer agreement was excellent (0.864, p<0.001). The AUC values for type 1 defects ranged from 0.778 and 0.860; for type 2 defects ranged from 0.920 and 0.967. The AUC value of type 1 defects was slightly better in panoramic images obtained with high kV and low mA levels (72 kV/3.2 mA), compared to others. Conclusions: In daily clinical routine, peri-implant bone defects might be evaluated by panoramic radiographs obtained with all kV and mA values tested. However, to avoid misdiagnosing and for better accuracy, panoramic radiographs obtained with high kV and low mA levels suitable for patients should be used, especially in the detec-tion of small or initial bone defects.
引用
收藏
页码:E16 / E24
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis Related to Severity of the Disease With Different Degrees of Bone Loss
    Koldsland, Odd Carsten
    Scheie, Anne Aamdal
    Aass, Anne Merete
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2010, 81 (02) : 231 - 238
  • [2] Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis
    Kandasamy, Baburajan
    Samson, Emmanuel P.
    Yaqoob, Ashfaq
    Pandey, Pragya
    Deenadayalan, S.
    Das, Indrani
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PREVENTIVE AND COMMUNITY DENTISTRY, 2018, 8 (04): : 361 - 364
  • [3] Bone Loss Biomarkers Evaluation as an Early Diagnosis and Prognostic Factor of Peri-implantitis
    Bartok, Francisc Florin
    Forna, Norina Consuela
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2016, 67 (09): : 1722 - 1724
  • [4] Evaluation of Sexual Dimorphism with Mandibular Parameters by Digital Panoramic Radiography
    Rad, Farzaneh Ostovar
    Javanshir, Bahareh
    Nemati, Somayeh
    Khaksari, Farnoosh
    Mansoori, Raheleh
    Ranjzad, Hadi
    Shokri, Abbas
    OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2020, 14 : 172 - 177
  • [5] Evaluation of Different Implant Designs in a Ligature-Induced Peri-implantitis Model: A Canine Study
    Battula, Suneel
    Lee, Jin Whan
    Wen, Hai Bo
    Papanicolaou, Savvas
    Collins, Michael
    Romanos, Georgios E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (03) : 534 - 545
  • [6] An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Peri-implant Soft Tissue Biotype and the Severity of Peri-implantitis: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Isler, Sila Cagri
    Uraz, Ahu
    Kaymaz, Ozlem
    Cetiner, Deniz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (01) : 187 - 196
  • [7] Evaluation of three different dental implants in ligature-induced peri-implantitis in the beagle dog .1. Clinical evaluation
    Tillmanns, HWS
    Hermann, JS
    Cagna, DR
    Burgess, AV
    Meffert, RM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1997, 12 (05) : 611 - 620
  • [8] Quantitative Evaluation of Inflammatory Markers in Peri-Implantitis and Periodontitis Tissues: Digital vs. Manual Analysis-A Proof of Concept Study
    Henin, Dolaji
    Fiorin, Luiz Guilherme
    Carmagnola, Daniela
    Pellegrini, Gaia
    Toma, Marilisa
    Cristofalo, Aurora
    Dellavia, Claudia
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (07):
  • [9] Evaluation of three different dental implants in ligature-induced peri-implantitis in the beagle dog. Part II. Histology and microbiology
    Tillmanns, HWS
    Hermann, JS
    Tiffee, JC
    Burgess, AV
    Meffert, RM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1998, 13 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [10] In-vitro Diagnosis of Approximal Caries in Teeth Periapical Radiography with Different Exposure Parameters
    Altun, Oguzhan
    Ozen, Duygu Celik
    Dedeoglu, Numan
    Duman, Suayip Burak
    Eser, Gozde
    Topaloglu, Edanur
    Ozemre, Begum
    Demirezer, Kardelen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 29 (04): : 780 - 789