Tensile behavior of UHPC wet joints for precast bridge deck panels

被引:16
|
作者
Jia, Junfeng [1 ]
Ren, Zhangdi [1 ]
Bai, Yulei [1 ]
Li, Jian [2 ]
Li, Bin [2 ]
Sun, Yagang [2 ]
Zhang, Zhixin [3 ]
Zhang, Jianxun [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Key Lab Urban Secur & Disaster Engn, Minist Educ, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Haiwei Engn Construct COLTD FHEC CCCC, Beijing 101119, Peoples R China
[3] CCCC China First Highway Engn Grp COLTD, Beijing 100024, Peoples R China
[4] Zhengzhou Commun Planning Survey & Design Inst, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
基金
对外科技合作项目(国际科技项目); 北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
Precast bridge deck panel; Wet joint; Accelerated bridge construction (ABC); Tensile test; Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC); HIGH-PERFORMANCE CONCRETE; FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR; LOOP CONNECTIONS; TIE MODEL; DESIGN; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115826
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Precast bridge deck panels (PBDPs) have been widely used in bridge engineering in the past decade. However, as the crucial part of connecting adjacent precast members, wet joints are often regarded as the weakest link in the bridge superstructure. To narrow the width of wet joints and reduce the assembling accuracy of U-bars, a total of five full-scale bridge deck panels (BDPs) were designed, which included four precast bridge deck panels with wet joints and one monolithic cast-in-place bridge deck panel (MCIPBDP). The major design variables included reinforcement types (straight bar and U-bar), U-bar lap details (non-contact lap and contact lap) and wet joint filling materials (NC and UHPC). The axial tensile loading tests were conducted to evaluate the tensile behavior of five BDPs. The experimental results demonstrated that all specimens experienced ductile failure, and finally failed due to the yielding of reinforcements. However, due to the insufficient lap length of 150 mm for the specimen P-NS-U200, bond slip appeared, and its ultimate tensile capacity decreased by 23.2% compared to the specimen P-NU-U200. Regarding the specimens P-NU-U200 and P-CU-U200, the difference in ultimate strength between non-contact lap and contact lap was within 3%. In addition, compared with the 500-mm-width normal concrete (NC) wet joint, the tensile capacity of the 200-mm-width UHPC wet joint was increased by 8.8%. Finally, based on the strut-and-tie model and failure mode, a modified calculation formula was proposed for estimating the tensile capacity of PBDPs. The predicted tensile capacity agrees well with the experimental results. The research provides a reference for engineers to guide the project's construction and apply UHPC wet joints in practical engineering.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flexural behavior of UHPC wet joints for precast bridge deck panels
    Jia, Junfeng
    Ren, Zhangdi
    Li, Jian
    Li, Bin
    Yan, Xingfei
    Wang, Yuguo
    Hu, Menghan
    STRUCTURES, 2024, 70
  • [2] Shear behavior of precast bridge deck panels with UHPC wet joints
    Ren, Zhangdi
    Jia, Junfeng
    Li, Jian
    Hu, Menghan
    Li, Bin
    Han, Qiang
    Du, Xiuli
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 316
  • [3] Flexural behavior of UHPC joints for precast UHPC deck slabs
    Qiu, Minghong
    Shao, Xudong
    Yan, Banfu
    Zhu, Yanping
    Chen, Yanliang
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 251
  • [4] Comparative structural behavior of bridge deck panels with polymer concrete and UHPC transverse field joints
    Abokifa, Mohamed
    Moustafa, Mohamed A.
    Itani, Ahmad M.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 247
  • [5] Experimental Behavior of Precast Bridge Deck Systems with Non-Proprietary UHPC Transverse Field Joints
    Abokifa, Mohamed
    Moustafa, Mohamed A.
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (22)
  • [6] Experimental Study on Mechanical Behavior of UHPC Joint of Precast Bridge Deck
    Shi X.
    Gao Y.
    Cao S.
    Huanan Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science), 2020, 48 (12): : 82 - 90and124
  • [7] Flexural behaviour analysis of wet joint of precast bridge deck with UHPC functional gradient
    Wang, Kai
    Guo, Liujun
    Wang, Jinyu
    Hu, Shimei
    Yu, Guoqing
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 26 (03) : 448 - 458
  • [8] A Laboratory Test of UHPC Connection for Precast Bridge Deck
    Li, Yue
    Jin, Zeren
    Ruan, Xin
    Ma, Biao
    Shi, Xuefei
    HIGH TECH CONCRETE: WHERE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING MEET, 2018, : 466 - 472
  • [9] Selling bridge builders on precast deck panels
    Horstketter, E.A.
    Concrete Producer, 1997, 15 (05):
  • [10] PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK PANELS
    不详
    JOURNAL PRESTRESSED CONCRETE INSTITUTE, 1987, 32 (02): : 26 - 45