Tibial nerve electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Jin, Qi [1 ]
Zhu, Ying [2 ]
Yin, Ping [3 ]
Li, Xiaojia [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Shanghai Municipal Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Shanghai 200071, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Pudong New Area, 1200 Cailun Rd, Shanghai 201203, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Long Hua Hosp, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fecal incontinence; Tibial nerve stimulation; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; FUNCTIONAL GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS; TRIAL; PTNS; NEUROMODULATION; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-022-01444-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) therapy is widely used to treat fecal incontinence (FI), but still, some controversy exists. This study aimed to determine whether TNS could improve FI from different evaluation angles. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to provide indirect evidence of TNS treatment for FI. We searched for the original studies in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ebsco Medline, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials published before November 31, 2021. The standardized mean difference was the efficacy analysis statistic, and the effect was expressed by the 95% confidence interval (CI). For the case series, we calculated the mean difference of the number of patients evaluated at baseline and last follow-up. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs, four hundred and sixty participants) and eighteen case series (eight hundred and thirty-eight participants) were included in the study. The results of the RCTs showed that the number of weekly episodes of FI significantly reduced in the TNS group compared with the sham stimulation group. The results of the case series showed that TNS reduced the number of patients with FI per week. The Cleveland Clinic Florida FI Score significantly reduced. The post-treatment results of maximum squeeze pressure and maximum resting pressure were significantly different from baseline. This study showed that TNS to some extent reduced the number of patients with FI, reduced clinical symptoms, and improved anal physiological function. Despite the low quality of overall evidence, TNS still shows some potential as a safe treatment for FI.
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1070
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tibial nerve electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qi Jin
    Ying Zhu
    Ping Yin
    Xiaojia Li
    [J]. Updates in Surgery, 2023, 75 : 1059 - 1070
  • [2] Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Fecal Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sarveazad, Arash
    Babahajian, Asrin
    Amini, Naser
    Shamseddin, Jebreil
    Yousefifard, Mahmoud
    [J]. BASIC AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 10 (05) : 419 - 431
  • [3] Placebo Response Rates in Electrical Nerve Stimulation Trials for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tan, Kirin
    Wells, Cameron I.
    Dinning, Phil
    Bissett, Ian P.
    O'Grady, Gregory
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2020, 23 (08): : 1108 - 1116
  • [4] Sacral nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Constantinos Simillis
    Nikhil Lal
    Shengyang Qiu
    Christos Kontovounisios
    Shahnawaz Rasheed
    Emile Tan
    Paris P. Tekkis
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2018, 33 : 645 - 648
  • [5] Sacral nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Simillis, Constantinos
    Lal, Nikhil
    Qiu, Shengyang
    Kontovounisios, Christos
    Rasheed, Shahnawaz
    Tan, Emile
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (05) : 645 - 648
  • [6] Posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence: a systematic review
    Arroyo-Fernandez, Ruben
    Avendano-Coy, Juan
    Ando-Lafuente, Sara
    Teresa Martin-Correa, Ma
    Ferri-Morales, Asuncion
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2018, 110 (09) : 577 - 587
  • [7] Is percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) effective for fecal incontinence (FI) in adults compared with sham electrical stimulation? A meta-analysis
    Can Luo
    Dongmei Wei
    Kaiyin Pang
    Ling Mei
    Yueyue Chen
    Xiaoyu Niu
    [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2024, 28
  • [8] Is percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) effective for fecal incontinence (FI) in adults compared with sham electrical stimulation? A meta-analysis
    Luo, Can
    Wei, Dongmei
    Pang, Kaiyin
    Mei, Ling
    Chen, Yueyue
    Niu, Xiaoyu
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [9] Efficacy of Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: A Systematic Review
    Ibanez-Vera, Alfonso Javier
    Mondejar-Ros, Rosa Maria
    Franco-Bernal, Vanessa
    Molina-Torres, Guadalupe
    Diaz-Mohedo, Esther
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (17)
  • [10] Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: A Systematic Evidence Review
    Edenfield, Autumn L.
    Amundsen, Cindy L.
    Wu, Jennifer M.
    Levin, Pamela J.
    Siddiqui, Nazema Y.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2015, 70 (05) : 329 - 341