Comparison of Preoperative Measurement Methods of Alveolar Cleft Volume Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography between Computer Simulation and Water Displacement Methods

被引:4
|
作者
Phienwej, Kaninut [1 ]
Chaiworawitkul, Marasri [1 ]
Jotikasthira, Dhirawat [1 ]
Khwanngern, Krit [2 ]
Sriwilas, Patiyut [3 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
来源
CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL | 2023年 / 60卷 / 01期
关键词
cleft lip and palate; alveolar cleft volume; alveolar bone grafting; CBCT; BONE; MODELS; PALATE; LIP; CT;
D O I
10.1177/10556656211055642
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the use of a computer simulation by Mimics software and the water displacement method as means for measurement of alveolar cleft volume on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data. Design Prospective study. Settling Institutional research. Patients Patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCCLP) who would undergo alveolar bone grafting. Interventions CBCT images of twenty patients with UCCLP were included in the study. In the first method, the water displacement method was adopted to measure volume of plasticine filled in the alveolar cleft imprinted on 3D printed model of maxilla. In the second method a volumetric assessment function in Mimics software was adopted to measure volume of 3D virtual model of alveolar cleft constructed from CBCT images. A comparison on the alveolar cleft volumes derived from the two methods was assessed using the statistical paired t-test. Main Outcome Measure The paired-t test showed no statistically significant difference between alveolar cleft volumes measured by the two methods (P = 0.075). Results Mean volume of the alveolar cleft measured by the water displacement method was 1.03 +/- 0.31 ml whereas by the computer simulation using Mimics software the value was 1.00 +/- 0.31 ml. The mean difference between the two methods was 0.03 +/- 0.08 ml. Conclusion The computer simulation by Mimics software as a means for measurement of alveolar cleft volume on CBCT data is as accurate as the measurement by the water displacement method.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 121
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of Two-Dimensional Methods for Left Atrial Volume Measurement: A Comparison of Echocardiography with Cardiac Computed Tomography
    Al-Mohaissen, Maha A.
    Kazmi, Mustapha H.
    Chan, Kwan Leung
    Chow, Benjamin J. W.
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2013, 30 (10): : 1135 - 1142
  • [32] Natural Bone Healing In Compromised Sockets After Tooth Extraction: Digital Measurement Methods With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
    An, Xueyin
    Oh, Ji-Hyeon
    Jeong, Seung-Mi
    Choi, Byung-Ho
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 47 (03) : 236 - 241
  • [33] Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of Bone Volume Estimation Using OsiriX Software in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
    Kochhar, Anuraj Singh
    Sidhu, Maninder Singh
    Prabhakar, Mona
    Bhasin, Ritasha
    Kochhar, Gulsheen Kaur
    Dadlani, Himanshu
    Spagnuolo, Gianrico
    Mehta, Viral Vijay
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2021, 9 (02)
  • [34] Comparison of Two Methods for Presurgical Volumetric Evaluation of Alveolar Cleft Bone Defects Using Computer-Aided Engineering
    Liu, Bing
    Yin, Ning B.
    Xiao, Ran
    Li, Hai D.
    Chen, Shu X.
    Li, Si L.
    Wang, Yong Q.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (02) : 477 - 481
  • [35] Measurement of myocardial extracellular volume using cardiac dual-energy computed tomography in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a comparison of different methods
    Shao, Jun
    Jiang, Jia-Shen
    Wang, Xiao-Yu
    Wu, Su-Meng
    Xiao, Jing
    Zheng, Kou-Long
    Qi, Rong-Xing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2022, 38 (07): : 1591 - 1600
  • [36] Assessment of Tophus Size; A Comparison Between Physical Measurement Methods and Dual Energy Computed Tomography Scanning
    Dalbeth, Nicola
    Aati, Opetaia
    Gao, Angela
    House, Meaghan
    Liu, Qiliang
    Horne, Anne
    Doyle, Anthony
    McQueen, Fiona M.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2011, 63 (10): : S632 - S632
  • [37] Comparison of Glenoid Fossa Morphology Between Different Sagittal Skeletal Pattern Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
    Khademi, Bahar
    Karandish, Maryam
    Paknahad, Maryam
    Farmani, Somaye
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (08) : E789 - E792
  • [38] A comparison of virtual reality and three-dimensional multiplanar educational methods for student learning of cone beam computed tomography interpretations
    Bui, Duy
    Benavides, Erika
    Soki, Fabiana
    Ramaswamy, Vidya
    Kosecki, Brianna
    Bonine, Brandon
    Kim-Berman, Hera
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2024, 88 (11) : 1572 - 1581
  • [39] Evaluation of the Relationship Between Morphology, Volume, and Density of the Mandible and Dentofacial Vertical Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
    Farzanegan, Fahimeh
    Zarch, Seyed Hosein Hoseini
    Mohasheri, Mohammad Farugh
    Rangrazi, Abdolrasoul
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2019, 19 (01):
  • [40] The applicability of Kvaal methods and pulp/tooth volume ratio for age estimation of the Turkish adult population on cone beam computed tomography images
    Akay, Gulsun
    Gungor, Kahraman
    Gurcan, Safa
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2019, 51 (03) : 251 - 265