SARSCOV-19 amidst corruption: Does the civil society matter? - An empirical study

被引:1
|
作者
Arkorful, Vincent Ekow [1 ]
Lugu, Benjamin Kweku [2 ]
Charway, Susana Mamley [3 ]
Arkorful, Vincent Ansah [4 ]
机构
[1] Hong Baptist Univ, Dept Govt & Int Studies, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Alabama, Coll Educ, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
[3] Catholic Inst Business & Technol, Dept Business Adm, Accra, Ghana
[4] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Geog & Rural Dev, Kumasi, Ghana
关键词
citizens' trust; civil society; corruption; COVID-19; Ghana; transparency and satisfaction; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; TRUST; SATISFACTION; HEALTH; GHANA; GOVERNMENT; ADOPTION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1002/pa.2825
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The pandemic outbreak has dealt consequences on global engagements and structures. With the ongoing search for pandemic-mitigating measures and the excesses (notably corruption) erupted in its wake, concerns have been raised about the decline in public trust, transparency and satisfaction - particularly in Ghana. This situation has spurred multilevel governance discussions regarding pandemic management. Ensuingly characterising policy makers' propositions in this regard is the civil society's salience as a control valve to governance deficits like corruption. Therefore, transcending the anecdotal claims on civil society's efficacy, this study takes a state-society perspective to probe its relevance in fostering trust, transparency and satisfaction, relative to corruption-stricken pandemic governance. The current study engages the general systems theory as a conceptual lens. The structural equation modelling technique was used in analysing data (n = 519) gathered through the questionnaire survey approach. Though results of data analysis affirmed the negative effects of corruption on trust, transparency and satisfaction, the civil society received affirmation as an enhancer of trust, transparency and satisfaction. In view of these study findings, implications and future research suggestions are delimited.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fostering Trust, Transparency, Satisfaction and Participation Amidst COVID-19 corruption: Does the Civil Society Matter? – Evidence from Ghana
    Vincent Ekow Arkorful
    Nurudeen Abdul-Rahaman
    Hidaya Sungjun Ibrahim
    Vincent Ansah Arkorful
    Public Organization Review, 2022, 22 : 1191 - 1215
  • [2] Fostering Trust, Transparency, Satisfaction and Participation Amidst COVID-19 corruption: Does the Civil Society Matter? - Evidence from Ghana
    Arkorful, Vincent Ekow
    Abdul-Rahaman, Nurudeen
    Ibrahim, Hidaya Sungjun
    Arkorful, Vincent Ansah
    PUBLIC ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2022, 22 (04) : 1191 - 1215
  • [3] Does Civil Society Matter? Governance in Contemporary India
    Ray, Aswini K.
    COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 2005, 43 (03) : 428 - 429
  • [4] Does civil society matter? Governance in contemporary India
    Sethi, H
    DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2004, 35 (05) : 1097 - 1098
  • [5] Does civil society matter? Governance in contemporary India
    Roy, A
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO INDIAN SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 39 (01): : 188 - 189
  • [6] Does Civil Society Matter? Governance in Contemporary India
    Tremblay, Reeta Chowdhari
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2006, 39 (02): : 456 - 457
  • [7] The Social Context of Regulatory Policy: Does Civil Society Matter?
    Casey, Colleen
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (4TH), VOL I, 2008, : 916 - 933
  • [8] Child development and the civil society - Does social capital matter?
    Vimpani, G
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS, 2000, 21 (01): : 44 - 47
  • [9] Does civil society matter?: Governance in contemporary India.
    Seshia, S
    PACIFIC AFFAIRS, 2004, 77 (03) : 593 - 594
  • [10] Does Revlon Matter? An Empirical and Theoretical Study
    Cain, Matthew D.
    Griffith, Sean J.
    Jackson, Robert J., Jr.
    Solomon, Steven Davidoff
    CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2020, 108 (06) : 1683 - 1731