Fast relocking and afterslip-seismicity evolution following the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake in Chile

被引:1
|
作者
Hormazabal, Joaquin [1 ]
Moreno, Marcos [2 ,3 ]
Ortega-Culaciati, Francisco [1 ,4 ]
Carlos Baez, Juan [5 ]
Pena, Carlos [6 ,7 ]
Sippl, Christian [8 ]
Gonzalez-Vidal, Diego [9 ]
Ruiz, Javier [1 ]
Metzger, Sabrina [6 ]
Yoshioka, Shoichi [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Fac Phys & Math Sci, Dept Geophys, Santiago, Chile
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica, Dept Struct & Geotech Engn, Santiago, Chile
[3] Millennium Inst Oceanog, IMO, Concepcion, Chile
[4] Data Observ Fdn, ANID Technol Ctr DO210001, Santiago, Chile
[5] Univ Chile, Fac Ciencias Fis & Matemat, Ctr Sismol Nacl, Santiago, Chile
[6] GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
[7] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Geosci, Bochum, Germany
[8] Czech Acad Sci, Inst Geophys, Prague, Czech Republic
[9] Univ Concepcion, Dept Earth Sci, Concepcion, Chile
[10] Kobe Univ, Res Ctr Urban Safety & Secur, Rokkodai Cho 1-1, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
[11] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Planetol, Rokkodai Cho 1-1, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
MAULE EARTHQUAKE; SUBDUCTION ZONE; MEGATHRUST EARTHQUAKES; COSEISMIC SLIP; LOCKING; PERU; GPS; DEFORMATION; MODELS; MOTION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-45369-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Large subduction earthquakes induce complex postseismic deformation, primarily driven by afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation, in addition to interplate relocking processes. However, these signals are intricately intertwined, posing challenges in determining the timing and nature of relocking. Here, we use six years of continuous GNSS measurements (2015-2021) to study the spatiotemporal evolution of afterslip, seismicity and locking after the 2015 Illapel earthquake (M-w 8.3). Afterslip is inverted from postseismic displacements corrected for nonlinear viscoelastic relaxation modeled using a power-law rheology, and the distribution of locking is obtained from the linear trend of GNSS stations. Our results show that afterslip is mainly concentrated in two zones surrounding the region of largest coseismic slip. The accumulated afterslip (corresponding to M-w 7.8) exceeds 1.5 m, with aftershocks mainly occurring at the boundaries of the afterslip patches. Our results reveal that the region experiencing the largest coseismic slip undergoes rapid relocking, exhibiting the behavior of a persistent velocity weakening asperity, with no observed aftershocks or afterslip within this region during the observed period. The rapid relocking of this asperity may explain the almost regular recurrence time of earthquakes in this region, as similar events occurred in 1880 and 1943.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fast relocking and afterslip-seismicity evolution following the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake in Chile
    Joaquín Hormazábal
    Marcos Moreno
    Francisco Ortega-Culaciati
    Juan Carlos Báez
    Carlos Peña
    Christian Sippl
    Diego González-Vidal
    Javier Ruiz
    Sabrina Metzger
    Shoichi Yoshioka
    Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [2] Transient Viscosity and Afterslip of the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel, Chile, Earthquake
    Guo, Rumeng
    Zheng, Yong
    Xu, Jianqiao
    Riaz, Muhammad Shahid
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2019, 109 (06) : 2567 - 2581
  • [3] Spatial–temporal properties of afterslip associated with the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake, Chile
    Yunfei Xiang
    Jianping Yue
    Zhongshan Jiang
    Yin Xing
    Earth, Planets and Space, 73
  • [4] Spatial-temporal properties of afterslip associated with the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake, Chile
    Xiang, Yunfei
    Yue, Jianping
    Jiang, Zhongshan
    Xing, Yin
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2021, 73 (01):
  • [5] Coseismic slip and afterslip of the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel (Chile) earthquake determined from continuous GPS data
    Shrivastava, Mahesh N.
    Gonzalez, Gabriel
    Moreno, Marcos
    Chlieh, Mohamed
    Salazar, Pablo
    Reddy, C. D.
    Carlos Baez, Juan
    Yanez, Gonzalo
    Gonzalez, Juan
    Carlos de la Llera, Juan
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (20) : 10710 - 10719
  • [6] Aftershock seismicity and tectonic setting of the 2015 September 16 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake, Central Chile
    Lange, Dietrich
    Geersen, Jacob
    Barrientos, Sergio
    Moreno, Marcos
    Grevemeyer, Ingo
    Contreras-Reyes, Eduardo
    Kopp, Heidrun
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 206 (02) : 1424 - 1430
  • [7] Low-parametric modeling of the 2015, MW 8.3 Illapel, Chile earthquake
    Bollini, Celeste
    Sabbione, Nora
    Plicka, Vladimir
    Zahradnik, Jiri
    JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2018, 88 : 144 - 156
  • [8] The Seismic Sequence of the 16 September 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel, Chile, Earthquake
    Ruiz, Sergio
    Klein, Emilie
    del Campo, Francisco
    Rivera, Efrain
    Poli, Piero
    Metois, Marianne
    Vigny, Christophe
    Baez, Juan Carlos
    Vargas, Gabriel
    Leyton, Felipe
    Madariaga, Raul
    Fleitout, Luce
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 87 (04) : 789 - 799
  • [9] Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Earthquake Dynamics: Case Study of the Mw 8.3 Illapel Earthquake, Chile
    Yin, Jiuxun
    Denolle, Marine A.
    Yao, Huajian
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2018, 123 (01) : 344 - 367
  • [10] Ionospheric Plasma Response to Mw 8.3 Chile Illapel Earthquake on September 16, 2015
    C. D. Reddy
    Mahesh N. Shrivastava
    Gopi K. Seemala
    Gabriel González
    Juan Carlos Baez
    Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2016, 173 : 1451 - 1461