Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters

被引:4
|
作者
Pitiriga, Vassiliki [1 ]
Bakalis, John [2 ]
Theodoridou, Kalliopi [1 ]
Dimitroulia, Evangelia [1 ]
Saroglou, George [2 ]
Tsakris, Athanasios [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Med Sch, Dept Microbiol, 75 Mikras Asias St, Athens 11527, Greece
[2] Metropolitan Hosp, Dept Internal Med, 9 Ethnarchou Makariou St, Athens 18547, Greece
关键词
Catheterization; Central venous catheter; Colonization; Bloodstream infection; Central line-associated bloodstream infection; Peripherally inserted central catheter; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTION; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS;
D O I
10.1186/s13756-023-01285-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundCentral venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), have been widely used as intravascular devices in critically ill patients. However, they might evoke complications, such as catheter colonization that has been considered as predisposing factor for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Although numerous studies have compared the risk of bloodstream infections between PICCs and CVCs, comparative studies on their colonization rates are limited.ObjectivesThe episodes of catheter colonization in critically ill patients with CVCs or PICCs were retrospectively analysed during a two-year period in a Greek tertiary care hospital and colonization rates, microbial profiles and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were compared.MethodsClinical and laboratory data of consecutive hospitalized critically-ill patients who underwent PICC and CVC placement between May 2017-May 2019 were analysed. All catheters were examined by the semiquantitative culture technique for bacterial pathogens, either as a routine process after catheter removal or after suspicion of infection. Species identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns were determined by the Vitek2 automated system.ResultsDuring the survey period a total of 122/1187 (10.28%) catheter colonization cases were identified among CVCs and 19/639 (2.97%) cases among PICCs (p = 0.001). The colonization rate was 12.48/1000 catheter-days for the CVC group and 1.71/1000 catheter-days for the PICC group (p < 0.001). The colonization rate per 1000 catheter-days due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) was 3.85 in all study cases, 7.26 (71/122) in the CVC group and 0.63 (7/19) in the PICC group (p < 0.001). Within the CVC group, the most common microorganism isolated was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 38, 31.1%) followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 20, 16.4%). In the PICC group, the predominant microorganism isolated was Candida spp. (n = 5, 23.8%) followed by MDR K. pneumoniae and MDR A. baumannii in equal numbers (n = 3, 14.2%).ConclusionPICC lines were associated with significantly lower colonization rates comparing to the CVC ones. In addition, patterns of microbial colonization revealed a trend over the predominance of MDR gram-negatives in CVCs suggesting that PICCs might be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient intravascular access. Prevention programs directed by local microbial ecology may diminish catheter colonization rates and CLABSIs.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters
    Vassiliki Pitiriga
    John Bakalis
    Kalliopi Theodoridou
    Evangelia Dimitroulia
    George Saroglou
    Athanasios Tsakris
    Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 12
  • [2] Comparison of Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in Pediatric Patients*
    Noonan, Patrick J.
    Hanson, Sheila J.
    Simpson, Pippa M.
    Dasgupta, Mahua
    Petersen, Tara L.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (12) : 1097 - 1105
  • [3] PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS
    RYDER, MA
    NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1993, 28 (04) : 937 - 971
  • [4] Comparison of Complication Rates Between Umbilical and Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in Newborns
    Arnts, Inge Johanna Jacoba
    Bullens, Lauren Maria
    Groenewoud, Joannes Martinus Maria
    Liem, Kian Djien
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2014, 43 (02): : 205 - 215
  • [5] Correlation of central venous pressure measured through peripherally inserted central catheters and central venous catheters
    Wells, JA
    Strube, P
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (12) : A118 - A118
  • [6] Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters and Central Venous Catheters in Burn Patients: A Comparative Review
    Fearonce, Griffin
    Faraklas, Iris
    Saffle, Jeffrey R.
    Cochran, Amalia
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2010, 31 (01): : 31 - 35
  • [7] Central venous pressure from peripherally inserted central catheters correlates well with that of centrally inserted central catheters
    Alansari, M
    Hijazi, M
    CHEST, 2004, 126 (04) : 873S - 873S
  • [8] Central Venous Catheters versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A Comparison of Indwelling Time Resulting in Colonization by Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens
    Pitiriga, Vassiliki C.
    Bakalis, John
    Campos, Elsa
    Kanellopoulos, Petros
    Sagris, Konstantinos
    Saroglou, George
    Tsakris, Athanasios
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (01):
  • [9] Complication rates among peripherally inserted central venous catheters and centrally inserted central catheters in the medical intensive care unit
    Nolan, Matthew E.
    Yadav, Hemang
    Cawcutt, Kelly A.
    Cartin-Ceba, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 31 (01) : 238 - 242
  • [10] Nurses inserted picc (peripherally inserted central venous catheters)
    George, Mary
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2008, 12 (02) : 164 - 164