Smear Layer and Debris Removal from Root Canals Comparing Traditional Syringe Irrigation and 3D Cleaning: An Ex Vivo Study

被引:6
|
作者
Iandolo, Alfredo [1 ]
Pisano, Massimo [1 ]
Abdellatif, Dina [2 ]
Sangiovanni, Giuseppe [1 ]
Pantaleo, Giuseppe [1 ]
Martina, Stefano [1 ]
Amato, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Med & Surg, I-84081 Salerno, Italy
[2] Univ Alexandria, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, Alexandria 21531, Egypt
关键词
EDTA; endodontics; root canal irrigants; smear layer; sodium hypochlorite; ultrasonics; NEEDLE; CLEANLINESS; INSTRUMENTS; ENDODONTICS; FLOW;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12020492
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Endodontic treatment objectives comprise eliminating or decreasing bacterial load inside the complex endodontic space. Removing the smear layer and debris becomes mandatory to achieve good three-dimensional (3D) cleaning. Aim: This study assesses the difference in smear layer removal using the 3D cleaning technique and traditional syringe needle irrigation. The 3D cleaning technique includes the ultrasonic activation of intracanal-heated NaOCl. Materials and Methods: Our current study used single-rooted human mandibular premolar teeth to test the earlier-mentioned technique (n = 30). Initially, an endodontic access cavity was performed. Consequently, specimens were randomly distributed into three study groups according to irrigation protocol. The groups were Group 1, where the traditional syringe needle irrigation system was applied; Group 2, where the 3D cleaning technique was performed; and Group 3, in which teeth remained uncleaned as it was regarded as the control group. Once the experiment was completed, the teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Debris and smear layers were viewed in 1000x magnification and scored. Results: Statistical analysis was performed with a standard statistical software package (SPSS, version 28.0; SPSS IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Data were analyzed with a nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA) among the groups tested and among the thirds of the canals. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. A statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower mean smear layer and debris score was observed in both study groups compared to the control group. Group 2 showed better results compared to Group 1. Conclusions: The present study concluded that the 3D cleaning technique is an effective irrigation method for removing debris and smear layers. Future research, such as CLSM (Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy) and Histological study, should be employed to confirm this study's conclusion.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation
    Haupt, Franziska
    Meinel, Michael
    Gunawardana, Asanka
    Huelsmann, Michael
    AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2020, 46 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [2] Effect of aquatine endodontic cleanser on smear layer removal in the root canals of ex vivo human teeth
    Garcia, Faustino
    Murray, Peter E.
    Garcia-Godoy, Franklin
    Namerow, Kenneth N.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2010, 18 (04) : 403 - 408
  • [3] The effect of different irrigation protocols on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a SEM study
    Demirel, Akif
    Yuksel, Burcu Nihan
    Ziya, Meryem
    Gumus, Husniye
    Dogan, Salih
    Sari, Saziye
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 77 (05) : 380 - 385
  • [4] Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Comparative Study of Ultrasonic and Sonic Irrigant Activation Techniques
    Wigler, Ronald
    Srour, Yara
    Wilchfort, Yuval
    Metzger, Zvi
    Kfir, Anda
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 12 (03)
  • [5] Comparison of irrigant activation devices and conventional needle irrigation on smear layer and debris removal in curved canals. (Smear layer removal from irrigant activation using SEM)
    Andreani, Yasmina
    Gad, Benjamin Thomas
    Cocks, Thomas Charles
    Harrison, Jonathan
    Keresztes, Mark Edward
    Pomfret, James Kennan
    Rees, Evan Benjamin
    Ma, Duoduo
    Baloun, Brett Lindsay
    Rahimi, Mehdi
    AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2021, 47 (02) : 143 - 149
  • [6] Comparison of three irrigation methods: SWEEPS, ultrasonic, and traditional irrigation, in smear layer and debris removal abilities in the root canal, beyond the fractured instrument
    Vatanpour, Mehdi
    Toursavadkouhi, Sohrab
    Sajjad, Shirin
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2022, 37
  • [7] Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model
    Andrabi, Syed Mukhtar-Un-Nisar
    Kumar, Ashok
    Zia, Afaf
    Iftekhar, Huma
    Alam, Sharique
    Siddiqui, Shiraz
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2014, 5 (03) : 188 - 193
  • [8] Effectiveness of Different Irrigant Agitation Techniques on Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
    Roedig, Tina
    Doellmann, Stefan
    Konietschke, Frank
    Drebenstedt, Steffi
    Huelsmann, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2010, 36 (12) : 1983 - 1987
  • [9] FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal from conservatively shaped canals: laser activated irrigation (PIPS and SWEEPS) compared to sonic and passive ultrasonic activation—an ex vivo study
    Manuele Mancini
    Loredana Cerroni
    Pietro Palopoli
    Giovanni Olivi
    Matteo Olivi
    Cristiano Buoni
    Luigi Cianconi
    BMC Oral Health, 21
  • [10] FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal from conservatively shaped canals: laser activated irrigation (PIPS and SWEEPS) compared to sonic and passive ultrasonic activation-an ex vivo study
    Mancini, Manuele
    Cerroni, Loredana
    Palopoli, Pietro
    Olivi, Giovanni
    Olivi, Matteo
    Buoni, Cristiano
    Cianconi, Luigi
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)