Extracellular volume fraction determined by equilibrium contrast-enhanced CT for the prediction of the pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

被引:13
|
作者
Luo, Yuesheng [1 ]
Liu, Leilei [1 ]
Liu, Daihong [1 ]
Shen, Hesong [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoxia [1 ]
Fan, Chunbo [2 ]
Zeng, Zhen [3 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Tan, Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyue [4 ]
Wu, Jiaxing [5 ]
Zhang, Jiuquan [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Canc Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Canc Hosp, Canc Radiotherapy Ctr, Sch Med, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Univ, Canc Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
[4] Siemens Healthineers, Xian 710000, Peoples R China
[5] Siemens Healthineers, Shanghai 200126, Peoples R China
关键词
Tomography; X-ray computed; Neoadjuvant therapy; Rectal neoplasms; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOMICS; CHEMORADIATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-022-09307-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the extracellular volume (ECV) fraction derived from equilibrium contrast-enhanced CT for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods The ECV fraction before NCRT (ECVpre) and/or ECV after NCRT (ECVpost) of rectal tumors was assessed, and ECV delta was calculated as ECVpost - ECVpre. The histopathologic tumor regression grading (TRG) was assessed. pCR (TRG 0 grade) was defined as the absence of viable tumor cells in the primary tumor and lymph nodes. Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics and ECV fraction were compared between the pCR and non-pCR groups. A mixed model was constructed by logistic regression. The performance for predicting pCR was assessed with the area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC). The AUCs of the different methods were compared by the method proposed by DeLong et al. Results Seventy-five patients were included; 17 achieved pCR, and 58 achieved non-pCR. The ECVpost (17.05 +/- 2.36% vs. 29.94 +/- 1.20%; p < 0.001) and ECV delta (- 17.01 +/- 3.01% vs. 0.44 +/- 1.45%; p < 0.001) values in the pCR group were significantly lower than those in the non-pCR group. The mixed model that combined ECVpost with ECV delta achieved an AUC of 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.81-0.98), which was higher than that of ECVpost (AUC, 0.91 (95% CI = 0.80-0.97); p = 0.60) or ECV delta (AUC, 0.90 (95% CI = 0.79-0.97); p = 0.61). Conclusions ECVpost and ECV delta determined by using equilibrium contrast-enhanced CT were useful in distinguishing between pCR and non-pCR patients with LARC who received NCRT.
引用
收藏
页码:4042 / 4051
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extracellular volume fraction determined by equilibrium contrast-enhanced CT for the prediction of the pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Yuesheng Luo
    Leilei Liu
    Daihong Liu
    Hesong Shen
    Xiaoxia Wang
    Chunbo Fan
    Zhen Zeng
    Jing Zhang
    Yong Tan
    Xiaoyue Zhang
    Jiaxing Wu
    Jiuquan Zhang
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 4042 - 4051
  • [2] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Use in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Tong, Tong
    Sun, Yiqun
    Gollub, Marc J.
    Peng, Weijun
    Cai, Sanjun
    Zhang, Zhen
    Gu, Yajia
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (03) : 673 - 680
  • [3] Morphologic predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Zhang, Chongda
    Ye, Feng
    Liu, Yuan
    Ouyang, Han
    Zhao, Xinming
    Zhang, Hongmei
    ONCOTARGET, 2018, 9 (04) : 4862 - 4874
  • [4] Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Cui, Yanfen
    Yang, Xiaotang
    Shi, Zhongqiang
    Yang, Zhao
    Du, Xiaosong
    Zhao, Zhikai
    Cheng, Xintao
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) : 1211 - 1220
  • [5] Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Yanfen Cui
    Xiaotang Yang
    Zhongqiang Shi
    Zhao Yang
    Xiaosong Du
    Zhikai Zhao
    Xintao Cheng
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 1211 - 1220
  • [6] Assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Ryan, J. E.
    Warrier, S. K.
    Lynch, A. C.
    Heriot, A. G.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (10) : 849 - 861
  • [7] Predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Ryan, J. E.
    Warrier, S. K.
    Lynch, A. C.
    Ramsay, R. G.
    Phillips, W. A.
    Heriot, A. G.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (03) : 234 - 246
  • [8] Radiomics Analysis for Evaluation of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Liu, Zhenyu
    Zhang, Xiao-Yan
    Shi, Yan-Jie
    Wang, Lin
    Zhu, Hai-Tao
    Tang, Zhenchao
    Wang, Shuo
    Li, Xiao-Ting
    Tian, Jie
    Sun, Ying-Shi
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (23) : 7253 - 7262
  • [9] Developing a prediction model based on MRI for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Wan, Lijuan
    Zhang, Chongda
    Zhao, Qing
    Meng, Yankai
    Zou, Shuangmei
    Yang, Yang
    Liu, Yuan
    Jiang, Jun
    Ye, Feng
    Ouyang, Han
    Zhao, Xinming
    Zhang, Hongmei
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (09) : 2978 - 2987
  • [10] Developing a prediction model based on MRI for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Lijuan Wan
    Chongda Zhang
    Qing Zhao
    Yankai Meng
    Shuangmei Zou
    Yang Yang
    Yuan Liu
    Jun Jiang
    Feng Ye
    Han Ouyang
    Xinming Zhao
    Hongmei Zhang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 2978 - 2987