Effects of an Explosion-Proof Wall on Shock Wave Parameters and Safe Area Prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Xiao, Dingjun [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Wentao [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Moujin [2 ]
Lu, Xiaoming [4 ]
Liu, Kaide [1 ]
Zhang, Jin [2 ]
Li, Xiaoshuang [2 ]
Long, Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Xijing Univ, Shaanxi Key Lab Safety & Durabil Concrete Struct, Xian 710123, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm & Resource, Mianyang 621010, Peoples R China
[3] Chengdu Inst Urban Safety & Emergency Management, Chengdu 610011, Peoples R China
[4] Mech Engn Res Inst, Xian 710123, Peoples R China
关键词
air explosion; diffraction angle; overpressure; impulse; dynamic pressure; overpressure prediction; safe area;
D O I
10.3390/su151411164
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To study the influences of an explosion-proof wall on shock wave parameters, an air explosion protection experiment was performed, the time history of shock wave pressure at different positions before and after the explosion-proof wall was established, and the characteristics of shock wave impulse and dynamic pressure were analyzed. The explosion-proof working conditions of five different diffraction angles were simulated and analyzed using Autodyn software(2019R3). Results indicated the following findings. The explosion-proof wall exerted an evident attenuation effect on the explosion shock wave, but considerable pressure still existed at the top of the explosion-proof wall. Overpressure behind the wall initially increased and then decreased. The larger the diffraction angle, the faster the attenuation speed of the diffraction overpressure of the shock wave in the air behind the wall. The history curve of shock wave pressure exhibited an evident bimodal structure. The shock wave diffraction of the wall made the shock wave bimodal structure behind the wall more prominent. The characteristics of the bimodal structure behind the wall (the interval time of overpressure peak & UDelta;t was less than the normal phase time of the diffracted shock wave T+) caused the shock wave impulse to stack rapidly, significantly improving its damage capability. The peak value of dynamic pressure on the oncoming surface was approximately two times the peak value of overpressure, and the inertia of air molecules resulted in a longer positive duration of dynamic pressure than overpressure. The maximum overpressure on the ground behind the explosion-proof wall appeared at approximately two times the height of the explosion-proof wall, while the maximum overpressure in the air behind the explosion-proof wall appeared at approximately one times the height of the explosion-proof wall. The relatively safe areas on the ground and in the air behind the wall were approximately 4-4.5 times and 3.5-4 times the height of the explosion-proof wall, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mitigation effects of explosion-proof water walls and explosion-proof concrete walls on blase shock wave
    Zhang, Yao
    Nian, Xin-Zhe
    Yan, Dong-Jin
    Sun, Chuan-Huai
    Wang, Hao-Zhou
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33 (18): : 214 - 220
  • [2] Explosion-proof vs. intrinsically safe
    Mostia Jr., William L.
    Control (Chicago, Ill), 1997, 10 (06): : 63 - 67
  • [3] Impact effect of pipeline explosion to adjacent pipelines in the same trench and explosion-proof performance of explosion-proof wall
    Yao A.
    Tian X.
    Xu T.
    Gao S.
    Jiang H.
    Li Y.
    Shiyou Xuebao/Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41 (06): : 753 - 761
  • [4] Design and Development of Explosion-Proof Cavity of Hydraulic System Power Unit Applied in Explosion-Proof Area
    Chen, Hanzhe
    Zhao, Dingxuan
    Zhang, Zhuxin
    Jia, Tuo
    Zhao, Ruoyu
    Qu, Zhengkun
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [5] Protection Performance of Typical Explosion-proof Equipment Against TNT Blast Shock Wave
    Yang L.
    Liu H.
    Huang G.
    Tian X.
    Binggong Xuebao/Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44 (10): : 2871 - 2884
  • [6] Substantiating the parameters of quickly erected explosion-proof stopping
    Kostenko, Viktor
    Zavialova, Olena
    Novikova, Yuliia
    Bohomaz, Olha
    Krupka, Yaroslav
    Kostenko, Tetiana
    RUDARSKO-GEOLOSKO-NAFTNI ZBORNIK, 2022, 37 (04): : 145 - 153
  • [7] Formal aspects of designing intrinsically safe explosion-proof apparatus
    Chmielarz, Stawomir
    Molenda, Tomasz
    Korski, Wojciech
    Oset, Krzysztof
    PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2018, 94 (10): : 221 - 225
  • [8] Testing of Explosion-Proof Coatings in Cylindrical and Conical Shock Tubes
    S. P. Medvedev
    E. K. Anderzhanov
    I. V. Guk
    A. N. Ivantsov
    A. I. Mikhaylin
    M. V. Silnikov
    V. S. Pomazov
    A. M. Tereza
    S. V. Khomik
    Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2020, 14 : 946 - 950
  • [9] Testing of Explosion-Proof Coatings in Cylindrical and Conical Shock Tubes
    Medvedev, S. P.
    Anderzhanov, E. K.
    Guk, I. V.
    Ivantsov, A. N.
    Mikhaylin, A. I.
    Silnikov, M. V.
    Pomazov, V. S.
    Tereza, A. M.
    Khomik, S. V.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2020, 14 (06) : 946 - 950
  • [10] Antiexplosion Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composite Explosion-Proof Wall
    Yang, Guoliang
    Huang, Wenjia
    Feng, Shuai
    ADVANCES IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020