A Research Agenda to Inform Cannabis Regulation: How Science Can Shape Policy

被引:6
|
作者
Schauer, Gillian L. [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Julie K. [3 ]
Rak, David J. [4 ]
Dodson, Lori [5 ]
Steinfeld, Nathanial [6 ]
Sheehy, Thomas J. [7 ]
Nakata, Michele [8 ]
Collins, Shawn P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cannabis Regulators Assoc, 1776 Ave States, Lexington, KY 40511 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Addict Drug & Alcohol Inst, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commiss, Worcester, MA USA
[4] Minnesota Dept Publ Hlth, Med Cannabis Program, St Paul, MN USA
[5] Maryland Med Cannabis Commiss, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Illinois Cannabis Regulat Oversight Off, Chicago, IL USA
[7] Oregon Liquor & Cannabis Commiss, Milwaukie, OR USA
[8] Hawaii Dept Publ Hlth, Med Cannabis Program, Honolulu, HI USA
关键词
cannabis; marijuana; policy; research; regulation; MARIJUANA USE; TOBACCO;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.03.010
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
In the United States, changes to cannabis policy have outpaced scientific knowledge about cannabis, its effects, and the impacts of different policy approaches. Research barriers stem from key federal policies, including strict drug scheduling of cannabis, which comprehensively hinder the ability to conduct cannabis research, affecting state markets, evidence -based regulation, and scientific gains that could more effectively shape policy moving forward. The Cannabis Regulators Association (CANNRA) is a nonpartisan nonprofit organization that convenes and supports government agencies to facilitate information exchange and learning from existing cannabis regulations across US states and territories and other governmental juris-dictions. This commentary outlines a research agenda that, if implemented, would address critical gaps in the science that cannabis regulators have identified in terms of knowledge regarding: (1) medicinal use of cannabis; (2) cannabis product safety; (3) cannabis consumer behaviors; (4) policies to promote equity and reduce disparities, both in the industry and more broadly in communities affected by the past criminalization of cannabis; (5) policies to prevent youth consumption and promote public health and safety; and (6) policies to reduce the illicit market and associated harms. The research agenda outlined here is the result of both formal discussions through CANNRA-wide meetings and informal discussions cannabis regulators have had as part of CANNRA committees. This research agenda is not all encompassing but rather highlights areas of research that have vital importance for cannabis regulation and policy implementation. Although many organizations weigh in on research needs related to cannabis, cannabis regulators (ie, the individuals implementing policies legalizing cannabis in states and territories) have generally not had a voice at the table advocating for specific research to be conducted. Their perspective representing the government agencies closest to the ground in terms of experiencing the impacts of current cannabis policy is essential to furthering quality, practical research that can advance informed and effective policy. (C) 2023 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 514
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How research and policy can shape driving under the influence of cannabis
    Metrik, Jane
    McCarthy, Denis M.
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2024, 119 (02) : 208 - 210
  • [2] How Affective Science Can Inform Behavioral Public Policy
    Vastfjall, Daniel
    Asutay, Erkin
    Tinghog, Gustav
    [J]. AFFECTIVE SCIENCE, 2024, 5 (03) : 213 - 216
  • [3] Establishing marine reserves: How can science best inform policy?
    Bergen, LK
    Carr, MH
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 45 (02): : 8 - 19
  • [4] How Practitioners Can Inform Policy
    Hruby, George G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 2018, 62 (02) : 215 - 218
  • [5] How Research on Stakeholder Perspectives Can Inform Policy on Cognitive Enhancement
    Forlini, Cynthia
    Racine, Eric
    Vollmann, Jochen
    Schildmann, Jan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2013, 13 (07): : 41 - 43
  • [6] All science should inform policy and regulation
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (05)
  • [7] From Scientism to Science: How Contemporary Epistemology Can Inform Practice Research
    Jeane W. Anastas
    [J]. Clinical Social Work Journal, 2012, 40 : 157 - 165
  • [8] From Scientism to Science: How Contemporary Epistemology Can Inform Practice Research
    Anastas, Jeane W.
    [J]. CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2012, 40 (02) : 157 - 165
  • [9] Strengthening Manufacturing: More Focus on How Research Can Inform Public Policy
    Poole, Kenneth E.
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2019, 33 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [10] Preparing Youth with Disabilities for College: How Research Can Inform Transition Policy
    Wilson, Michael G.
    Hoffman, Amanda V.
    McLaughlin, Margaret J.
    [J]. FOCUS ON EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2009, 41 (07) : 1 - 10