The prognostic utility of prehospital qSOFA in addition to emergency department qSOFA for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study

被引:3
|
作者
Saito, Ayaka [1 ]
Osawa, Itsuki [2 ]
Shibata, Junichiro [1 ]
Sonoo, Tomohiro [3 ,4 ]
Nakamura, Kensuke [4 ]
Goto, Tadahiro [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Fac Med, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, Tokyo, Japan
[3] TXP Med Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Hitachi Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, Ibaraki, Japan
[5] Univ Tokyo, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Tokyo, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME; CLINICAL-CRITERIA; MORTALITY; IMPUTATION; ACCURACY; SOFA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0282148
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) was widely used to estimate the risks of sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the prehospital and emergency department (ED) settings. Due to the insufficient sensitivity of qSOFA on arrival at the ED (ED qSOFA), the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2021 recommended against using qSOFA as a single screening tool for sepsis. However, it remains unclear whether the combined use of prehospital and ED qSOFA improves its sensitivity for identifying patients at a higher risk of sepsis at the ED. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data from the ED of a tertiary medical center in Japan from April 2018 through March 2021. Among all adult patients (aged >= 18 years) transported by ambulance to the ED with suspected infection, we identified patients who were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. We compared the predictive abilities of prehospital qSOFA, ED qSOFA, and the sum of prehospital and ED qSOFA (combined qSOFA) for sepsis in patients with suspected infection at the ED. ResultsAmong 2,407 patients with suspected infection transported to the ED by ambulance, 369 (15%) patients were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis, and 217 (9%) died during hospitalization. The sensitivity of prehospital qSOFA >= 2 and ED qSOFA >= 2 were comparable (c-statistics for sepsis [95%CI], 0.57 [0.52-0.62] vs. 0.55 [0.50-0.60]). However, combined qSOFA (cutoff, >= 3 [max 6]) was more sensitive than ED qSOFA (cutoff, >= 2) for identifying sepsis (0.67 [95%CI, 0.62-0.72] vs. 0.55 [95%CI, 0.50-0.60]). Using combined qSOFA, we identified 44 (12%) out of 369 patients who were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis, which would have been missed using ED qSOFA alone. ConclusionsUsing both prehospital and ED qSOFA could improve the screening ability of sepsis among patients with suspected infection at the ED.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic performance of qSOFA in oncology patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected infection
    Koh, Tze Lui
    Canet, Emmanuel
    Amjad, Sobia
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    Taylor, David
    Gan, Hui K.
    Marhoon, Nada
    Lim, Andrew
    Ong, Wee Loon
    Krishnan, Vivek
    Khor, Richard
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (01) : 94 - 100
  • [2] Prognostic accuracy of qSOFA at triage in patients with suspected infection in a Brazilian emergency department
    Maia, Ian Ward A.
    Silva, Lucas Oliveira J. E.
    Herpich, Henrique
    Diogo, Luciano
    Batista Santana, Joao Carlos
    Pedrollo, Daniel
    Alvarez Perez, Mario Castro
    Nicolaidis, Rafael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 50 : 41 - 45
  • [3] Prognostic performance of qSOFA in cancer patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected infection
    Koh, Tze T. L.
    Canet, Emmanuel E. C.
    Amjad, Sobia S. A.
    Bellomo, Rinaldo R. B.
    Taylor, David D. T.
    Gan, Hui H. G.
    Marhoon, Nada N. M.
    Lim, Andrew A. L.
    Krishnan, Vivek V. K.
    Khor, Richard R. K.
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 : 63 - 64
  • [4] Use of prehospital qSOFA in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study
    Koyama, Satoshi
    Yamaguchi, Yutaka
    Gibo, Koichiro
    Nakayama, Izumi
    Ueda, Shinichiro
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [5] Lactate ≥2 mmol/L plus qSOFA improves utility over qSOFA alone in emergency department patients presenting with suspected sepsis
    Shetty, Amith
    Macdonald, Stephen P. J.
    Williams, Julian M.
    van Bockxmeer, John
    de Groot, Bas
    Esteve Cuevas, Laura M.
    Ansems, Annemieke
    Green, Malcolm
    Thompson, Kelly
    Lander, Harvey
    Greenslade, Jaimi
    Finfer, Simon
    Iredell, Jonathan
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2017, 29 (06) : 626 - 634
  • [6] Predicting mortality in patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department; A retrospective cohort study comparing qSOFA, SIRS and National Early Warning Score
    Brink, Anniek
    Alsma, Jelmer
    Verdonschot, Rob Johannes Carel Gerardus
    Rood, Pleunie Petronella Marie
    Zietse, Robert
    Lingsma, Hester Floor
    Schuit, Stephanie Catherine Elisabeth
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [7] Sensitivity and Specificity of SIRS, qSOFA and Severe Sepsis for Mortality of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Suspected Infection
    Lembke, Kelly
    Parashar, Sanjay
    Simpson, Steven
    [J]. CHEST, 2017, 152 (04) : 401A - 401A
  • [8] qSOFA as predictor of mortality and prolonged ICU admission in Emergency Department patients with suspected infection
    Canet, Emmanuel
    Taylor, David McD
    Khor, Richard
    Krishnan, Vivek
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 48 : 118 - 123
  • [9] Is Prehospital Assessment of qSOFA Parameters Associated with Earlier Targeted Sepsis Therapy? A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Dankert, Andre
    Kraxner, Jochen
    Breitfeld, Philipp
    Bopp, Clemens
    Issleib, Malte
    Doehn, Christoph
    Bathe, Janina
    Krause, Linda
    Zoellner, Christian
    Petzoldt, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (12)
  • [10] Relationships Among SIRS, qSOFA, and Sepsis-2 or Sepsis-3 Organ Dysfunction in Emergency Department Patients with Suspected Infection
    Parashar, S.
    Lembke, K.
    Simpson, S. Q.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197