PROVISIONS FOR QUALITY SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETING

被引:0
|
作者
Yasin, Miroslav [1 ]
Komarova, Anna [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] ANOVO Moscow Int Univ, Dept Gen Humanitarian Sci & Mass Commun, Moscow, Russia
[2] Moscow State Linguist Univ, Fac English, Galina Zaitseva Ctr Deaf Studies & Sign Language, Moscow, Russia
[3] Moscow State Linguist Univ, Fac English, Dept English Stylist, Moscow, Russia
来源
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY STUDIES | 2023年 / 21卷 / 04期
关键词
sign language interpreters; quality of sign language interpretation; deaf and hard-of-hearing people; hearing loss; quality of life; Russian sign language;
D O I
10.17323/727-0634-2023-21-4-599-612
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
High-quality sign language interpreting is one of the key factors in the inclusion of people with hearing loss in the social environment and access to information. Ensuring the quality of sign language interpreting is a relatively new phenomenon in world practice. In Russia, we are at the beginning of understanding this issue, forming quality criteria and implementing guarantee mechanisms. The study raises the question of what are the current conditions for ensuring the quality of translation of Russian sign language. In order to solve this problem, sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts. On the basis of these interviews, a thematic analysis and systematization of the existing problems in ensuring the quality of interpreting were carried out. The main problems of ensuring the quality are the following: the problem of professional training, the problem of the status of the language, the problem of 'mixing roles,' and the problem of 'separation of powers' of organizations. All four problems are rooted in history, in the earlier stages of development of sign language interpreting in Russia. There is an acute shortage of interpreters, which is why people who only know sign language are allowed to interpret without any special requirements for qualification or training. Not many universities train advanced students; there are difficulties in the organization of sign language teaching. The traditions of 'sign language interpreting' are preserved, which assume that interpreters also perform the functions of social workers. The issue of 'separation of powers' between organizations representing the social order in interpreting for a person with hearing loss, organizations providing interpreting services, and quality control organizations remains controversial. In conclusion, the possible ways of resolving the accumulated contradictions are briefly explained, which will allow the formation of some system of ensuring the quality of sign language interpreting.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 612
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sign language interpreting in Sweden
    Nilsson, AL
    META, 1997, 42 (03) : 550 - 554
  • [2] SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETING FOR THE DEAF
    EBBINGHAUS, H
    HESSMANN, J
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SEMIOTIK, 1988, 10 (1-2): : 109 - 112
  • [3] ISSUES IN BULGARIAN SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETING
    Lozanova, Slavina
    ENGLISH STUDIES AT NBU, 2018, 4 (02): : 131 - 144
  • [4] Survey on sign language interpreting in China
    Xiao Xiaoyan
    Yu Ruiling
    INTERPRETING, 2009, 11 (02) : 137 - 163
  • [5] REFLECTIONS ON SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETING TYPOLOGY
    Pires Pereira, Maria Cristina
    CADERNOS DE TRADUCAO, 2015, 35 (02): : 46 - 77
  • [6] The Sign Language Interpreting Studies Reader
    Major, George
    JOURNAL OF SPECIALISED TRANSLATION, 2017, (28): : 395 - 397
  • [7] Sign Language Interpreting Down Under
    Power, Des
    JOURNAL OF DEAF STUDIES AND DEAF EDUCATION, 2012, 17 (02): : 288 - 288
  • [8] The sign language interpreting studies reader
    Janzen, Terry
    Interpreting, 2016, 18 (02) : 294 - 299
  • [9] Sign language support in an inclusive environment: Educational sign language interpreting services in Taiwan
    Liu, Hsiu Tan
    Hsieh, Han Ho
    Lin, Wan Ying
    Andrews, Jean F.
    Liu, Chun Jung
    DEAFNESS & EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 26 (01) : 37 - 57
  • [10] Sign Language Interpreting: Deconstructing the myth of neutrality
    Corker, M
    DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2000, 15 (06) : 949 - 955