Patient Satisfaction and Impact on Oral Health after Maxillary Rehabilitation Using a Personalized Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant (AMSJI)

被引:3
|
作者
Van den Borre, Casper [1 ,2 ]
De Neef, Bjorn [3 ]
Loomans, Natalie A. J. [4 ,5 ]
Rinaldi, Marco
Nout, Erik [6 ]
Bouvry, Peter [7 ]
Naert, Ignace [8 ]
Mommaerts, Maurice Y. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Doctoral Sch Life Sci & Med, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, European Face Ctr, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Gen Hosp Oudenaarde, Dept Oro Maxillo Facial Surg, B-9700 Oudenaarde, Belgium
[4] Private Clin Face Ahead Antwerp, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[5] GZA Hosp, Div Oro Maxillo Facial Surg, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[6] ETZ Hosp, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, NL-5022 GC Tilburg, Netherlands
[7] AZ Alma, Dept Oro Maxillo Facial Surg, B-9900 Eeklo, Belgium
[8] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Prosthet Dent, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2023年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
three-dimensional printing; subperiosteal; implant; patient satisfaction; alveolar bone loss; patient-specific implants; DENTURES;
D O I
10.3390/jpm13020297
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Subperiosteal implants (SIs) were first developed by Dahl in 1941 for oral rehabilitation in case of severe jaw atrophy. Over time, this technique was abandoned due to the high success rate of endosseous implants. The emergence of patient-specific implants and modern dentistry allowed a revisitation of this 80-year-old concept resulting in a novel "high-tech" SI implant. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes in forty patients after maxillary rehabilitation with an additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI((R))). The oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14) and numerical rating (NRS) scale were used to assess patient satisfaction and evaluate oral health. In total, fifteen men (mean age: 64.62 years, SD +/- 6.75 years) and twenty-five women (mean age: 65.24 years, SD +/- 6.77 years) were included, with a mean follow-up time of 917 days (SD +/- 306.89 days) after AMSJI installation. Patients reported a mean OHIP-14 of 4.20 (SD +/- 7.10) and a mean overall satisfaction based on the NRS of 52.25 (SD +/- 4.00). Prosthetic rehabilitation was achieved in all patients. AMSJI is a valuable treatment option for patients with extreme jaw atrophy. Patients enjoy treatment benefits resulting in high patient satisfaction rates and impact on oral health.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Mechanical evaluation of a patient-specific additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) using finite-element analysis
    De Moor, E.
    Huys, S. E. F.
    van Lenthe, G. H.
    Mommaerts, M. Y.
    Vander Sloten, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (03) : 405 - 411
  • [2] Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant in the treatment of severe maxillary atrophy
    Rinaldi, Marco
    Mommaerts, Maurice Y.
    [J]. DENTAL CADMOS, 2019, 87 (04) : 200 - 212
  • [3] Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of titanium and Cfr-peek additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) on maxilla
    Altiparmak, Nur
    Polat, Serhat
    Onat, Selen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 124 (01)
  • [4] Radiographic Evaluation of Bone Remodeling after Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implantation (AMSJI) in the Maxilla: A One-Year Follow-Up Study
    Van den Borre, Casper
    Rinaldi, Marco
    De Neef, Bjorn
    Loomans, Natalie A. J.
    Nout, Erik
    Van Doorne, Luc
    Naert, Ignace
    Politis, Constantinus
    Schouten, Hylke
    Klomp, Geert
    Beckers, Ludovic
    Freilich, Marshall M.
    Mommaerts, Maurice Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (16)
  • [5] Patient- and clinician-reported outcomes for the additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) in the maxilla: a prospective multicentre one-year follow-up study
    van den Borre, C.
    Rinaldi, M.
    De Neef, B.
    Loomans, N. A. J.
    Nout, E.
    Van Doorne, L.
    Naert, I
    Politis, C.
    Schouten, H.
    Klomp, G.
    Beckers, L.
    Freilich, M. M.
    Mommaerts, M. Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (02) : 243 - 250
  • [6] Bimaxillary Immediate Prosthetic Rehabilitation Using a Custom Maxillary Subperiosteal Implant and Fibula-Free Flap Mandibular Reconstruction After Tumor Ablation
    Lee, Kevin C.
    Frias, Vladimir
    Ozturk, Can
    Best, David L.
    Markiewicz, Michael R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 35 (03) : e280 - e282
  • [7] Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life 10 years after implant placement
    Wang, Yan
    Baumer, Daniel
    Ozga, Ann-Kathrin
    Korner, Gerd
    Baumer, Amelie
    [J]. BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [8] Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life 10 years after implant placement
    Yan Wang
    Daniel Bäumer
    Ann-Kathrin Ozga
    Gerd Körner
    Amelie Bäumer
    [J]. BMC Oral Health, 21
  • [9] Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis and milled bar overdenture for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation. A crossover study
    ELsyad, Moustafa Abdou
    Al-Tonbary, Gilan Youssef
    Askar, Osama Mohammed
    Elgamal, Mohamed
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (11) : 1107 - 1117