Analgesic Efficacy of Combined Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Lili [1 ]
Hu, Yang [1 ]
Liu, Hong [2 ]
Qi, Xue [1 ]
Chen, Hong [1 ]
Cao, Wei [3 ]
Wang, Longsheng [4 ]
Zhang, Ye [1 ]
Wu, Yun [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calif Davis Hlth, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Sacramento, CA USA
[3] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[4] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2023年 / 29卷
关键词
Anesthesia and Analgesia; Nerve Block; Pain; Postoperative; Thoracic Surgery; Video-Assisted; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY; CHRONIC PAIN; THORACOTOMY; INJECTION; SPREAD; SAFETY;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.940247
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are widely used in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). However, they have corresponding adverse effects, including hypotension for TPVB and unpredictable injectate spread in ESPB. An optimal perioperative analgesic strategy remains controversial. We investigated the effect of ultrasound-guided combined TPVB and ESPB (CTEB) for VATS.Material/Methods: A total of 120 patients scheduled for thoracic surgery were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided TPVB, ESPB, or CTEB preoperatively. Postoperative analgesia was achieved with sufentanil patient-controlled intravenous analgesia. The primary outcome was the static pain score at 2 h after surgery. Results: The static pain score 2 h postoperatively was significantly different among the 3 groups. This difference was sta-tistically significant for Group ESPB vs Group TPVB (P=0.004), but not for Group ESPB vs Group CTEB (P=0.767), or Group TPVB vs Group CTEB (P=0.117). Group TPVB exhibited the highest incidence of hypotension among the 3 groups. More patients experienced a sensory loss in Groups TPVB and CTEB 30 min after the block per-formance. Patients receiving CTEB exhibited a lower incidence of chronic pain 6 months postoperatively than those in Group ESPB. Conclusions: CTEB does not enhance the analgesic effect of ESPB in patients undergoing VATS; however, it may induce a faster sensory loss after nerve block and reduce the incidence of postoperative chronic pain compared with ESPB. CTEB may also help to reduce the incidence of intraoperative hypotension compared with TPVB.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Combination in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
    Zengin, Musa
    Baldemir, Ramazan
    Ulger, Gulay
    Sazak, Hilal
    Alagoz, Ali
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [2] The Analgesic Efficacy of the Single Erector Spinae Plane Block with Intercostal Nerve Block Is Not Inferior to That of the Thoracic Paravertebral Block with Intercostal Nerve Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
    Kim, Sujin
    Song, Seung Woo
    Do, Hyejin
    Hong, Jinwon
    Byun, Chun Sung
    Park, Ji-Hyoung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (18)
  • [3] any logo, Comparison of efficacy of erector spinae plane block, thoracic paravertebral block, and erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block combination for acute pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study
    Zengin, Musa
    Alagoz, Ali
    Sazak, Hilal
    Ulger, Gulay
    Baldemir, Ramazan
    Senturk, Mert
    [J]. MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (03) : 138 - 148
  • [4] Erector Spinae Plane Block-Block of Choice for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery?
    Chaudhary, Omar
    Matyal, Robina
    Sharkey, Aidan
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 112 (03): : 1037 - 1038
  • [5] Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block combined with intercostal nerve block for pain management in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Sun, Lingling
    Mu, Jing
    Gao, Bin
    Pan, Yuexian
    Yu, Lang
    Liu, Yang
    He, Huanzhong
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block combined with intercostal nerve block for pain management in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Lingling Sun
    Jing Mu
    Bin Gao
    Yuexian Pan
    Lang Yu
    Yang Liu
    Huanzhong He
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [7] Comparison of Rhomboid Intercostal Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block, and Serratus Plane Block on Analgesia for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Zhang, Jian-Guo
    Jiang, Chen-Wei
    Deng, Wei
    Liu, Fen
    Wu, Xiao-Ping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 2022
  • [8] Comparison of Rhomboid Intercostal Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block, and Serratus Plane Block on Analgesia for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Zhang, Jian-Guo
    Jiang, Chen-Wei
    Deng, Wei
    Liu, Fen
    Wu, Xiao-Ping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 2022
  • [9] Paravertebral block combined with serratus anterior plane block after video-assisted thoracic surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Dusseaux, Marie-Melody
    Grego, Victor
    Baste, Jean-Marc
    Besnier, Emmanuel
    Boujibar, Fairuz
    Koscianski, Godefroy
    Ben Yahia, Mohamed Mehdi
    Compere, Vincent
    Clavier, Thomas
    Vannier, Margot
    Selim, Jean
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 64 (01)
  • [10] The erector spinae plane block in 4 cases of video-assisted thoracic surgery
    Luis-Navarro, J. C.
    Seda-Guzman, M.
    Luis-Moreno, C.
    Lopez-Romero, J. L.
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2018, 65 (04): : 204 - 208