Clinico-Hematological Profile of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Experience From a Tertiary Care Cancer Center in North India

Introduction: Complete diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) requires knowledge of clinical information combined with morphologic evaluation, immunophenotyping, karyotyping, and molecular genetic testing. The study intends to evaluate the demographic profile, clinical workup, and investigation, including flow cytometric immunophenotyping, in adult and pediatric age groups of AML. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of AML patients treated between January 2017 and December 2021. Clinical and demographic characteristics and investigation findings were recorded from case files and the hematology database. Result: A total of 896 cases of AML were registered during the given period, of which 819 cases were de-novo AML. Among those 819 cases, more than two-thirds of cases, i.e., 78.9% (N = 646), received induction chemotherapy. A significantly higher male-to-female ratio was observed (1.5:1). The median age was 22 years. The median time for diagnosis was three days and the median time for treatment intervention was four days. There were significant differences in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scores between pediatric and adult AML patients. Pediatric AML patients presented with better ECOG performance scores (ECOG performance scores 0 and 1) than adult patients (74.76% vs. 43.14%, p < 0.001). Further comparing adult vs. pediatric AML patients, normal karyotype (60.56% vs. 31.93%, p < 0.001) and NPM1 (22.25% vs. 6.72%, p < 0.001) and FLT3-ITD mutations (20.28% vs. 7.98%, p<0.001) were more common in the adult group, whereas AML-ETO (40.76% vs. 16.34%, p < 0.001) was more common in the pediatric group. Conclusion: The study highlights the presenting age is lower than global figures. The median time for initial diagnosis and the start of treatment is within the acceptable norms. Normal karyotype and NPM1 and FLT3 mutations were common in adult AML patients, whereas AML-ETO was more common in the pediatric cohort. These findings will help plan prospective studies and see the correlation with treatment outcomes. The laboratory workup practice currently complies with the standard guidelines at our center.