Straw management in paddy fields can reduce greenhouse gas emissions: A global meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
He, Zijian [1 ]
Cao, Hongxia [1 ]
Qi, Chen [1 ]
Hu, Qingyang [1 ]
Liang, Jiaping [2 ]
Li, Zhijun [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid & Semiarid Area, Minist Educ, Xianyang 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Modern Agr Engn, Kunming 650500, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Straw return in paddy fields; Straw management; Greenhouse gas emissions; Global warming potential; Meta-analysis; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; RICE-STRAW; CROP RESIDUE; AGRICULTURAL SOILS; FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT; TILLAGE PRACTICES; NO-TILLAGE; CARBON MINERALIZATION; METHANE EMISSIONS; PLANT RESIDUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109218
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Context: Straw return is gaining popularity as a viable agricultural practice for improving soil fertility, crop yield, and produce qualityProblem: However, the inconsistent assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from straw return in paddy fields poses a threat to both the environment and food securityObjective and methods: Therefore, a meta-analysis of 858 comparisons from 93 studies was conducted to determine the GHG emissions performance from straw return in paddy fields, identify key factors and propose the optimal straw management practices to achieve global warming potential (GWP) reductionsResults: The results indicated that straw return lowered N2O emissions (Hedges' d = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.30 to -0.06), but the benefits were fully counteracted by significant increase in CO2 (Hedges' d = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.38-2.97) and CH4 (Hedges' d = 2.82, 95% CI: 2.56-3.08) emissions, and resulting in higher GWP (Hedges' d = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.26-3.26). GHG emissions from straw return in paddy fields affected by climate and soil conditions as well as agricultural management practices, with mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP), pH and straw size as key factors for CH4, N2O, CO2 and GWP, respectively. Additionally, GWP also influenced by MAT, MAP, soil C/N, available N, soil total N, pH, straw return method and cropping practice. Optimal GWP reduction performance was obtained when 5-10 cm straw was returned to the paddy field in region with MAP < 1338 mm. However, as climate conditions remain challenging to alter, we propose the following straw management recommendations for paddy fields: straw return amount greater than 7500 kg<middle dot>ha(-1), with straw size >= 5 cm, and straw incorporationConclusions: Optimizing straw management in paddy fields can improve straw acceptance in paddy fields as well as mitigating the greenhouse effectImplications: This study holds implications for informing the widespread adoption of straw return practices in paddy fields by providing a scientifically grounded foundation for decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fertilization management and greenhouse gases emissions from paddy fields in China: A meta-analysis
    Liang, Yanning
    Xue, Lihua
    Jia, Pingping
    Zhang, Sheng
    Hu, Yi
    Zamanian, Kazem
    Zhao, Xiaoning
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2024, 315
  • [2] Effects of intercropping on soil greenhouse gas emissions - A global meta-analysis
    Gui, Dongyang
    Zhang, Yuyang
    Lv, Jiyang
    Guo, Jiayi
    Sha, Zhipeng
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 918
  • [3] Responses of soil greenhouse gas emissions to no-tillage: A global meta-analysis
    Li, Zhaoxin
    Zhang, Qiuying
    Li, Zhao
    Qiao, Yunfeng
    Du, Kun
    Yue, Zewei
    Tian, Chao
    Leng, Peifang
    Cheng, Hefa
    Chen, Gang
    Li, Fadong
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 36 : 479 - 492
  • [4] Grain yield and greenhouse gas emissions from maize and wheat fields under plastic film and straw mulching: A meta-analysis
    Wang, Haiming
    Zheng, Jing
    Fan, Junliang
    Zhang, Fucang
    Huang, Chihua
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2021, 270
  • [5] Subsurface fertilization boosts crop yields and lowers greenhouse gas emissions: A global meta-analysis
    Bhuiyan, Mohammad Saiful Islam
    Rahman, Azizur
    Loladze, Irakli
    Das, Suvendu
    Kim, Pil Joo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 876
  • [6] Marginal abatement costs of greenhouse gas emissions: A meta-analysis
    Kuik, Onno
    Brander, Luke
    Tol, Richard S. J.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (04) : 1395 - 1403
  • [7] Waterbird response to management practices in rice fields intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
    Sesser, Kristin A.
    Reiter, Matthew E.
    Skalos, Daniel A.
    Strum, Khara M.
    Hickey, Catherine M.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2016, 197 : 69 - 79
  • [8] Impacts of rice varieties and management on yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions from rice fields in China: A meta-analysis
    Zheng, H.
    Huang, H.
    Yao, L.
    Liu, J.
    He, H.
    Tang, J.
    [J]. BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2014, 11 (13) : 3685 - 3693
  • [9] Exploring a suitable nitrogen fertilizer rate to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and ensure rice yields in paddy fields
    Zhong, Yiming
    Wang, Xiaopeng
    Yang, Jingping
    Zhao, Xing
    Ye, Xinyi
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 565 : 420 - 426
  • [10] Assessment of the straw and biochar application on greenhouse gas emissions and yield in paddy fields under intermittent and controlled irrigation patterns
    He, Hao
    Li, Dandan
    Wu, Zhurong
    Wu, Ze
    Hu, Zhenghua
    Yang, Shuyun
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 359