Prediction of end point %C of CONARC® furnace using machine learning methods

被引:0
|
作者
Parul, Kota [1 ]
Samiraj, Albin Rozario [1 ]
Hazra, Sujoy S. [1 ]
机构
[1] JSW Steel Ltd, Res & Dev, Dolvi 402107, Maharashtra, India
关键词
CONARC (R); steelmaking; endpoint prediction; machine learning; tree model; support vector machine; STEELMAKING PROCESS; PHOSPHORUS-CONTENT; FAULT-DIAGNOSIS; MOLTEN STEEL; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s12046-023-02163-7
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
CONARC (R) steel making process is a combination of convertor steel making and electric arc steelmaking to get the benefit of both the process and make it flexible in terms of using raw material feed mix. Raw material feed mix in this furnace on an average is 60% hot metal (HM), 38% cold direct reduced iron (CDRI) and 2% steel scrap. In this furnace operation there are two phases, namely, the oxygen blowing phase and arcing phase followed by tapping of steel into the ladle. During the oxygen blowing phase, the HM carbon content is reduced from 4.5% to 0.3%-0.5%, and further reduced to 0.025-0.03% in the arcing phase depending upon the grade of steel produced. During the arcing stage, CoJet (TM) lances are used for the oxidation of the bath and reduction of the carbon content to the desired values. The end point %C parameter is very important in CONARC (R) steel making as it determines the productivity and quality of the steel produced. Based on the analysis, mathematical and machine learning approach was adopted to predict the end point %C during the arcing stage of the furnace. The algorithms which are used and compared are the tree-based models and support vector machines. After comparing the results, the tree based model seems best fit after further optimization to get an accuracy of 83%. The model was validated with plant trials and the accuracy was found to be within +/- 0.013 %C.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of end point %C of CONARC® furnace using machine learning methods
    KOTA PARUL
    ALBIN ROZARIO SAMIRAJ
    SUJOY S HAZRA
    [J]. Sādhanā, 48
  • [2] Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point
    Cavasotto, Claudio N.
    Scardino, Valeria
    [J]. ACS OMEGA, 2022, 7 (51): : 47536 - 47546
  • [3] Furnace Temperature Prediction Using Optimized Kernel Extreme Learning Machine
    Zhang, Pinggai
    Jiang, Yiyu
    Wang, Mengzhen
    Fei, Minrui
    Wang, Ling
    Rakic, Aleksandar
    [J]. 2021 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 40TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2021, : 2711 - 2715
  • [4] Water quality prediction using machine learning methods
    Haghiabi, Amir Hamzeh
    Nasrolahi, Ali Heidar
    Parsaie, Abbas
    [J]. WATER QUALITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF CANADA, 2018, 53 (01): : 3 - 13
  • [5] Epileptic Seizures Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods
    Usman, Syed Muhammad
    Usman, Muhammad
    Fong, Simon
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 2017
  • [6] Discrete sequence prediction using machine learning methods
    Sharif, H
    Conner, M
    [J]. IC-AI '04 & MLMTA'04 , VOL 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 1097 - 1101
  • [7] CIN Classification and Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods
    Chirkina, Anastasia
    Medvedeva, Marina
    Komotskiy, Evgeny
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2017, 1836
  • [8] Traffic Flow Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods
    Wang, Hainan
    Wei, Xuetong
    Yao, Junyuan
    Zhang, Yue
    [J]. 2021 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, BIG DATA AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE (MLBDBI 2021), 2021, : 30 - 35
  • [9] Prediction of cadmium content using machine learning methods
    Kececi, Mehmet
    Gokmen, Fatih
    Usul, Mustafa
    Koca, Celal
    Uygur, Veli
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 83 (12)
  • [10] Prediction of Skin Penetration Using Machine Learning Methods
    Sun, Yi
    Moss, Gary P.
    Prapopoulou, Maria
    Adams, Rod
    Brown, Marc B.
    Davey, Neil
    [J]. ICDM 2008: EIGHTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 1049 - +