Reexamining the NSF GRFP review process

被引：0

作者：

Evande, Roxanne ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE USA

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/j.jbc.2023.103515

中图分类号：

Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];

学科分类号：

071010 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

1773

引用

页码：S256 / S256

页数：1

共 50 条

[1] NSF INVITES INPUT ON REVIEW PROCESS
PETERSEN, AC
PHYSICS TODAY, 1995, 48 (11) : 11 - &
[2] NSF: Peer review and the grants process.
Hixson, SH
Long, GL
ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 217 : U310 - U310
[3] NSF review process should be revamped, not taken for granted
Robinson, GW
PHYSICS TODAY, 1997, 50 (08) : 82 - 83
[4] NSF MAKES IT EASIER TO APPEAL AS IT OPENS UP REVIEW PROCESS
MERVIS, J
SCIENTIST, 1990, 4 (06): : 2 - 2
[5] Perspective: Medical Education Research and the Institutional Review Board: Reexamining the Process
Johansson, Anna C.
Durning, Steven J.
Gruppen, Larry D.
Olson, Marianne E.
Schwartzstein, Richard M.
Higgins, Patricia A.
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2011, 86 (07) : 809 - 817
[6] NSF PEER REVIEW
HUSOVSKY, AA
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1977, 49 (11) : A945 - &
[7] NSF BUDGET REVIEW
HENIG, RM
BIOSCIENCE, 1979, 29 (04) : 216 - 216
[8] AN EXPERIMENT IN LOOKING - REEXAMINING THE PROCESS OF OBSERVATION
JABLONKO, A
KAGAN, E
TDR-THE DRAMA REVIEW-A JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE STUDIES, 1988, 32 (04): : 148 - 163
[9] REVIEW OF NSF OPPORTUNITIES IN EDUCATION
WATSON, RF
ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1992, 204 : 36 - NUCL
[10] NSF PEER-REVIEW
HOWER, J
SCIENCE, 1982, 215 (4531) : 344 - 344