Economic Results of Forage Species Choice in Crop-Livestock Integrated Systems

被引:8
|
作者
Leal, Vanessa Nunes [1 ]
Santos, Darliane de Castro [1 ]
Paim, Tiago do Prado [1 ]
dos Santos, Luizmar Peixoto [1 ]
Alves, Estenio Moreira [2 ]
Claudio, Flavio Lopes [2 ]
Calgaro Junior, Guido [2 ]
Fernandes, Patrick Bezerra [1 ]
Salviano, Paulo Alexandre Perdomo [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol, Goiano Campus Rio Verde,Rodovia Sul Goiana,Km 01, BR-75901970 Rio Verde, GO, Brazil
[2] Inst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol, Goiano Campus Ipora,Ave Oeste 350,Parque Uniao, BR-76200000 Ipora, GO, Brazil
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
cattle; production systems; cost; income; return on equity; MANAGEMENT; PASTURES; YIELD;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture13030637
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Crop-livestock integrated production systems (CLISs) combine cash-crop production and forage production in succession. There are plenty of options of forage cultivars with differences in production aspects and seeds cost, and there is little information on how the choice of forage cultivar can affect the results of a CLIS. We hypothesized that different forage cultivars can have important economic impacts on production systems. Thus, we evaluated the two-year economic results of using three forage species in a CLIS: (1) Urochloa ruziziensis; (2) Megathyrsus maximus cv. BRS Zuri e; and (3) Megathyrsus maximus cv. BRS Tamani. The system was evaluated during 2018 and 2019 with no-tillage soybean (Glycine max) cultivation from November to March and grazing of cattle from May to August. The seed costs were, on average, USD 25.27 ha(-1) for Ruziziensis grass, USD 39.97 ha(-1) for Zuri guinea grass, and USD 64.13 ha(-1) for Tamani guinea grass. Animal production varied from 96.4 to 147.5 kg of live weight per hectare per year and mean two-year soybean yields varied from 3849 to 4217 kg per hectare, both without differences between forage cultivars. However, the lowest values for animal and soybean yields were obtained with Ruziziensis grass, and the highest were obtained with Zuri grass. Thus, Zuri guinea grass presented a net income (NI) of USD 1039.87 ha(-1) with an annual return on equity (ROE) equal to 11.19%, while Ruziziensis grass obtained an NI equal to USD 612.65 ha(-1) with an ROE of 6.47%, demonstrating the economic impact of forage resource choice in CLISs. Therefore, the choice of forage cultivars adequate for the conditions of an individual farm can correspond to an increase of 69.7% in net income, which highlights the importance of continuing efforts to develop new cultivars and the simultaneous evaluation of these cultivars in different production scenarios in order to better recommend forage genetic resources for particular production environments.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Economic dimension of integrated crop-livestock systems
    Martha Junior, Geraldo Bueno
    Alves, Eliseu
    Contini, Elisio
    [J]. PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2011, 46 (10) : 1117 - 1126
  • [2] Cycling of winter forage nutrients under integrated crop-livestock systems
    Vengen, Andressa Perini
    Bartzen, Bruna Thaina
    Mattei, Eloisa
    Rocha de Moraes Rego, Carlos Augusto
    Piano, Jeferson Tiago
    Rabello de Oliveira, Paulo Sergio
    [J]. REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL, 2020, 7 (04): : 101 - 110
  • [3] An economic analysis of integrated crop-livestock systems in Iowa, USA
    Poffenbarger, Hanna
    Artz, Georgeann
    Dahlke, Garland
    Edwards, William
    Hanna, Mark
    Russell, James
    Sellers, Harris
    Liebman, Matt
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 157 : 51 - 69
  • [4] Optimizing forage allowance for productivity and weed management in integrated crop-livestock systems
    Schuster, Mauricio Z.
    Campos Lustosa, Sebastiao Brasil
    Pelissari, Adelino
    Harrison, Steven Kent
    Sulc, Reuben Mark
    Deiss, Leonardo
    Lang, Claudete Reisdorfer
    de Faccio Carvalho, Paulo Cesar
    Pisa Gazziero, Dionisio Luiz
    de Moraes, Anibal
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 39 (02)
  • [5] Optimizing forage allowance for productivity and weed management in integrated crop-livestock systems
    Mauricio Z. Schuster
    Sebastião Brasil Campos Lustosa
    Adelino Pelissari
    Steven Kent Harrison
    Reuben Mark Sulc
    Leonardo Deiss
    Claudete Reisdorfer Lang
    Paulo Cesar de Faccio Carvalho
    Dionísio Luiz Pisa Gazziero
    Anibal de Moraes
    [J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2019, 39
  • [6] CONTRACTS IN INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS
    Stanton, Marcia Silva
    [J]. REVISTA DIREITO GV, 2022, 18 (02)
  • [7] Integrated crop-livestock systems in the Brazilian subtropics
    de Moraes, Anibal
    de Faccio Carvalho, Paulo Cesar
    Anghinoni, Ibanor
    Campos Lustosa, Sebastiao Brasil
    Gigante de Andrade Costa, Sergio Ely Valadao
    Kunrath, Taise Robinson
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2014, 57 : 4 - 9
  • [8] Research on Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in Brazil
    de Moraes, Anibal
    de Faccio Carvalho, Paulo Cesar
    Campos Lustosa, Sebastiao Brasil
    Lang, Claudete Reisdorfer
    Deiss, Leonardo
    [J]. REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA, 2014, 45 (05): : 1024 - 1039
  • [9] Evolution of integrated crop-livestock production systems
    Entz, MH
    Bellotti, WD
    Powell, JM
    Angadi, SV
    Chen, W
    Ominski, KH
    Boelt, B
    [J]. Grassland: A Global Resource, 2005, : 137 - 148
  • [10] Integrated crop-livestock systems in the Cerrado region
    Vilela, Lourival
    Martha Junior, Geraldo Bueno
    Motta Macedo, Manuel Claudio
    Marchao, Robelio Leandro
    Guimaraes Junior, Roberto
    Pulrolnik, Karina
    Maciel, Giovana Alcantara
    [J]. PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2011, 46 (10) : 1127 - 1138