Resin Composite Versus Amalgam Restorations Placed in United States Dental Schools

被引:7
|
作者
Alreshaid, L. [1 ,2 ]
El-Badrawy, W. [1 ]
Kulkarni, G. [3 ]
Santos, M. J.
Prakki, A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Dept Clin Sci, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada
[2] King Saud Bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Pediat Dent, Fac Dent, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada
[4] Room 547, 124 Edward St, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
POSTERIOR COMPOSITES; REPLACEMENT; DENTISTRY; CARIES; TEETH; US;
D O I
10.2341/22-007-C
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the latest teaching policies for posterior resin composite placement versus amalgam and to determine the actual numbers of posterior resin composites versus amalgam restorations placed in American dental schools from 2008 to 2018.Methods: Emails were sent to the deans of all 66 dental schools in the United States to collect data in the forms of: 1) Questionnaire on current teaching policies of posterior composite and amalgam restorations; and 2) Data entry form to collect the actual numbers of posterior composite and amalgam restorations placed in their clinics. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize ratios of posterior restorations. Inferential analysis (chisquare test and z-test) was employed to compare posterior restoration proportions over time and within each year. Level of significance was set at 0.05. Results: For the teaching questionnaire, the response rate was 52% (n=34). Seventy-six per cent of the responding schools reported that they assign 50% or more of their preclinical restorative teaching time towards posterior resin composite placement, while 50% of the responding schools devoted 25% or less towards amalgam teaching. Data entry response rate was 26% (n=17). In 2008, amalgam and resin composite restorations were placed almost equally. However, resin composite restorations were placed significantly more frequently from 2009 onwards in all responding schools. The results revealed a significant ongoing increasing trend in placing posterior resin composites in all responding schools over time (p<0.05).Conclusions: Data analysis revealed a clear trend towards an increase in posterior resin composite restoration placement and a decrease in the number of amalgam restorations. However, the time assigned for posterior resin composite teaching is not aligned with quantity of restorations placed. Review and adjustment of the time allocated for teaching and training of each material are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 32
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Composite versus Amalgam Restorations Placed in Canadian Dental Schools
    Alreshaid, L.
    El-Badrawy, W.
    Lawrence, H. P.
    Santos, M. J.
    Prakki, A.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 46 (06) : 621 - 630
  • [2] Early Failure of Class III Resin Composite Versus Class II Amalgam Restorations Placed by Dental Students
    Overton, J. D.
    Sullivan, Diane J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2012, 76 (03) : 338 - 340
  • [3] Trends in Material Choice for Posterior Restorations in an Israeli Dental School: Composite Resin Versus Amalgam
    Ben-Gal, Gilad
    Weiss, Ervin I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2011, 75 (12) : 1590 - 1595
  • [4] Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students
    Naghipur, Safa
    Pesun, Igor
    Nowakowski, Anthony
    Kim, Aaron
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 116 (03): : 336 - 339
  • [5] AMALGAM VERSUS COMPOSITE RESIN IN CLASS-2 RESTORATIONS IN PRIMARY TEETH
    NELSON, GV
    OSBORNE, JW
    GALE, EN
    PHILLIPS, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1978, 57 : 82 - 82
  • [6] Frequency of amalgam versus posterior resin restorations
    Terblanche, J
    Van Vuuren, PAJ
    Germishuys, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 613 - 613
  • [7] AMALGAM VERSUS COMPOSITE RESIN IN CLASS-II RESTORATIONS IN PRIMARY TEETH
    NELSON, GV
    OSBORNE, JW
    GALE, EN
    PHILLIPS, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1979, 58 : 327 - 327
  • [8] THE DURABILITY OF AMALGAM VERSUS COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS
    HENDRIKS, FHJ
    LETZEL, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1988, 67 (04) : 689 - 689
  • [9] Salivary Cells in Patients with Dental Amalgam and Composite Resin Material Restorations - a Morphological Investigation
    Kalsacka, Irena
    Lapinska, Joanna
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2010, 19 (06): : 1223 - 1227
  • [10] Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations Placed by Dental Students of Kuwait University
    Al-Samhan, Asmaa
    Al-Enezi, Hanadi
    Alomari, Qasem
    [J]. MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2010, 19 (04) : 299 - 304