Working with Adults with Intellectual Disability and Clinicians to Advance Mental Health Treatment: Informing Practice Guidelines and Research

被引:0
|
作者
Witwer, Andrea N. [1 ,6 ]
Rosencrans, Margaret E. [2 ]
Taylor, Christopher A. [3 ]
Cobranchi, Chelsea [4 ]
Krahn, Gloria L. [5 ]
Havercamp, Susan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Hlth, Nisonger Ctr, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Behav Hlth, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Dept Med Dietet, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Nisonger Ctr, Columbus, OH USA
[5] Oregon State Univ, Coll Publ Hlth & Human Sci, Columbus, OH USA
[6] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Hlth, Nisonger Ctr, 371G McCampbell Hall,1581 Dodd Dr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Psychotherapy; Intellectual disability; Focus group; Grounded theory; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PEOPLE; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/19315864.2024.2308297
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe current study obtained perspectives on psychotherapy practices from adults with intellectual disability receiving psychotherapy and mental health clinicians serving adults with intellectual disability. The goal was to identify opportunities, successes, and challenges through the perspective of adults with intellectual disability who have received mental health treatment (i.e. clients) and clinicians providing psychotherapy.MethodA total of six virtual focus groups, three with clinicians and three with clients with intellectual disability who had experience with psychotherapy, were conducted. Transcripts were coded by two independent reviewers guided by grounded theory.ResultsBroadly, analyses indicated overlapping themes with rich perspectives from both groups. Both clinicians and clients with intellectual disability identified a number of key aspects that were perceived as foundational to therapy and to improving the therapeutic relationship and comfort of the client with intellectual disability. Themes related to rapport building and self-determination emerged, despite not being directly asked of either group. Both clinicians and clients with intellectual disability discussed the therapeutic process at length, related to general types of treatment modality as well as the importance of individualizing treatment strategies. Clinicians spoke of regularly making accommodations to increase treatment accessibility.ConclusionThe focus group results align with and supplement treatment outcome research and have implications for training, practice, and future research.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条