Optimizing rapid pentachlorophenol biodegradation using response surface methodology

被引:0
|
作者
Khalil, O. A. A. [1 ]
Omara, M. Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] Egyptian Atom Energy Author EAEA, Radiat Microbiol Dept, Natl Ctr Radiat Res & Technol NCRRT, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Bacillus; biodegradation; Pentachlorophenol; Pseudomonas; response surface methodology; SERRATIA-MARCESCENS AY927692; DEGRADING BACTERIUM; PSEUDOMONAS SP; WASTE-WATER; DEGRADATION; PCP; PULP; DECHLORINATION; OPTIMIZATION; ENRICHMENT;
D O I
10.1080/10889868.2022.2086528
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) is one of the most toxic pollutants in the environment during modern industrial processes. Statistical experimental designs based on biological methods optimized the PCP biodegradation by Bacillus mucilaginosus and Pseudomonas plecoglossicida. Four factors were selected for PCP removal; glucose, ferric ammonium citrate, PCP concentration, and incubation period. PBD and CCD were performed to recognize the maximum PCP biodegradation. The maximum PCP biodegradation in PBD by B. mucilaginosus was obtained at glucose, 0.5 (g/l); ferric ammonium citrate, 0.5 (g/l); PCP concentration, 300 (mg/l) and incubation period, 3 (days) while the maximum conditions by P. plecoglossicida were glucose, 0.5 (g/l); ferric ammonium citrate, 0.5 (g/l); PCP concentration, 100 (mg/l) and incubation period, 3 (days). In addition, CCD predicted the optimum predicted degradation of PCP (100%) by the two selected strains using glucose (1.0 g/l), ferric ammonium citrate (0.059 mg/l), PCP concentration (350 mg/l), and 2-days for B. mucilaginosus. While glucose (0.276 g), ferric ammonium citrate (0.047 mg/l) and 2-days were optimal conditions for P. plecoglossicida. P. plecoglossicida.and B. mucilaginosus could degrade more than 72% and 61% of PCP when these isolates were grown under a high concentration of PCP (300 and 350 mg L-1) in a mineral salt medium, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 344
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimizing aerobic biodegradation of dichloromethane using response surface methodology
    Wu Shijin
    Yu Xiang
    Hu Zhihang
    Zhang Lili
    Chen Jianmeng
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2009, 21 (09) : 1276 - 1283
  • [3] Optimizing aerobic biodegradation of dichloromethane using response surface methodology
    WU ShijinYU XiangHU ZhihangZHANG LiliCHEN Jianmeng College of Biological and Environmental EngineeringZhejiang University of TechnologyHangzhou China
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2009, 21 (09) : 1276 - 1283
  • [4] Optimizing Enzymatic Biodegradation of Skins Waste Using Response Surface Methodology
    Stefan, Daniela Simina
    Orbeci, Cristina
    Stefan, Mircea
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2019, 70 (06): : 2087 - 2090
  • [5] Studies on biodegradation of phenol using response surface methodology
    Sheeja, RY
    Murugesan, T
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 77 (11) : 1219 - 1230
  • [6] Optimizing protocol interaction using response surface methodology
    Vadde, KK
    Syrotiuk, VR
    Montgomery, DC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, 2006, 5 (06) : 627 - 639
  • [7] Optimizing the biodegradation of two keratinous wastes through a Bacillus subtilis recombinant strain using a response surface methodology
    Embaby, Amira M.
    Zaghloul, Taha I.
    Elmahdy, Ahmed R.
    BIODEGRADATION, 2010, 21 (06) : 1077 - 1092
  • [8] Optimizing the biodegradation of two keratinous wastes through a Bacillus subtilis recombinant strain using a response surface methodology
    Amira M. Embaby
    Taha I. Zaghloul
    Ahmed R. Elmahdy
    Biodegradation, 2010, 21 : 1077 - 1092
  • [9] Optimizing decomposition of food wastes using response surface methodology
    Saleh, Zubaidah Md
    Mohamed, Radin Maya Saphira Radin
    Al-Gheethi, Adel
    Zainun, Noor Yasmin
    Kamil, Nor Amani Filzah Mohd
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 31 : 96 - 99
  • [10] Optimizing Energy Harvesting Parameters Using Response Surface Methodology
    Mane, Poorna
    Mossi, Karla
    Green, Christopher
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2009, 56 (03) : 429 - 436