Oncologic outcomes with and without amniotic membranes in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity score matched analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Noel, Jonathan [1 ]
Stirt, Daniel [2 ]
Moschovas, Marcio Covas [1 ,2 ]
Reddy, Sunil [1 ]
Jaber, Abdel Rahman [1 ]
Sandri, Marco [3 ]
Bhat, Seetharam [4 ]
Rogers, Travis [1 ]
Ahmed, Subuhee [5 ]
Mascarenhas, Anya [6 ]
Patel, Ela [1 ]
Patel, Vipul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Advent Hlth, Global Robot Inst, Celebration, FL 34747 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Med, Orlando, FL USA
[3] Univ Brescia, Big & Open Data Innovat Lab, Brescia, Italy
[4] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Syracuse, NY USA
[5] Kansas City Univ, Coll Med, Kansas City, MO USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
Prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Robotic; Oncology; Outcome; Allograft; Biomaterial; Dehydrated human amnion chorion membrane; EARLY RETURN; CONTINENCE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajur.2022.05.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Placement of human placenta derived grafts during robotic -assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) hastens the return of continence and potency. The long-term impact on the oncologic outcomes remains to be investigated. Our objective was to determine the oncologic outcomes of patients with dehydrated human amnion chorion membrane (dHACM) at RARP compared to a matched cohort. Methods: In a referral centre, from August 2013 to October 2019, 599 patients used dHACM in bilateral nerve -sparing RARP. We excluded patients with less than 12 months follow-up, simple prostatectomy, and unilateral nerve -sparing. Patients with dHACM (amnio group) were 529, and were propensity score matched 1:1 to 2465 patients without dHACM (non-amnio group) and a minimum follow-up of 36 months. At the time of RARP, dHACM was placed around the neurovascular bundle in the amnio group. Continuous and categorical variables in matched groups was tested by two -sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Fisher's exact test respectively. Outcomes measured were biochemical recurrence (BCR), adjuvant and salvage therapy rates. Results: Propensity score matching resulted in two groups of 444 patients. Cumulative incidence functions for BCR did not show a difference between the groups (p=0.3). Patients in the non-amnio group required salvage therapy more frequently than the amnio group, particularly after partial nerve-sparing RARP (6.3% vs. 2.3%, p=0.001). Limitations are the absence of prospective randomization. Conclusion: The data suggest that using dHACM does not have a negative impact on BCR in patients. Outcomes of cancer specific and overall survival will require follow-up study to increase our understanding of these grafts' impact on prostate cancer biology. 2024 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 25
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oncologic outcomes between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: a propensity score matched analysis
    Michael Ahdoot
    Leanne Almario
    Hiwot Araya
    Jonas Busch
    Simon Conti
    Mark L. Gonzalgo
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 1441 - 1446
  • [2] Oncologic outcomes between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: a propensity score matched analysis
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Almario, Leanne
    Araya, Hiwot
    Busch, Jonas
    Conti, Simon
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (06) : 1441 - 1446
  • [3] AGE STRATIFIED PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED STUDY OUTCOMES OF ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar
    Pigilam, Suneel
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Ebra, George
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Patel, Vipul
    Coelho, Rafael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E587 - E587
  • [4] Midterm oncologic outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Negron, Edris J.
    Razmaria, Aria
    Ledezma, Rodrigo
    Richards, Kyle A.
    Szmulewitz, Russell Zelig
    Zagaja, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [5] Comparative oncologic analysis of open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy matched by D'Amico risk category
    Sooriakumaran, P.
    Shariat, S. F.
    Srivastava, A.
    Grover, S.
    Chromecki, T.
    Tewari, A. K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 : 35 - 35
  • [6] Should obesity be associated with worse urinary continence outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy? a propensity score matching analysis
    Mourao, Thiago Camelo
    Rosa de Oliveira, Renato Almeida
    Favaretto, Ricardo de Lima
    Marques Santana, Thiago Borges
    Ricetto Sacomani, Carlos Alberto
    Bachega Jr, Wilson
    Guimaraes, Gustavo Cardoso
    Zequi, Stenio de Cassio
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2022, 48 (01): : 122 - 130
  • [7] Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy by a Single Surgeon
    Hung, Sheng-Chun
    Yang, Chen-Kuang
    Cheng, Chen-Li
    Ou, Yen-Chuan
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (08) : 4157 - 4164
  • [8] Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A propensity score matched analysis
    Wu, Zhiqiang
    Ma, Shaohua
    THORACIC CANCER, 2023, 14 (20) : 1921 - 1931
  • [9] SURGICAL, ONCOLOGIC AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH A GLEASON SCORE>=8 UNDERGOING ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Poth, Sandor
    Labanaris, Apostolos P.
    Zugor, Vahudin
    Witt, Jorn H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A226 - A226
  • [10] PATIENT SURGICAL SATISFACTION FOLLOWING DA VINCI® SINGLE PORT AND MULTI PORT ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS
    Noel, Jonathan
    Helman, Talia
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Helman, Rachel
    Sandri, Marco
    Bhat, Seetharam
    Reddy, Sunil
    Rogers, Travis
    Patel, Vipul
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E263 - E264