Consumers' paradoxical motives of co-creation: From self-service technology to crowd-sourcing platform

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Xueqin [1 ]
Wong, Yiik Diew [2 ]
Liu, Feng [3 ]
Yuen, Kum Fai [2 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Int Logist, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Nanyang, Singapore
[3] Shandong Univ, Business Sch, Weihai, Peoples R China
关键词
Technological paradox; Self-service technology; Crowd; -sourcing; Co; -creation; Working consumer; Shared responsibility; Perceived empowerment; LAST MILE DELIVERY; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; SCALE DEVELOPMENT; DESTRUCTION; MODEL; WORK; COPRODUCTION; INTEGRATION; FAIRNESS; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122934
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Self-service technologies (SSTs) have unleashed the productive potential of modern consumers, while crowd -sourcing (C-S) platforms have further elevated the co-creation role of consumers. In this regard, consumers participate to serve not only themselves privately but also other consumers in social/communal settings. Thus, this study aims to explore and compare consumers' motives to co-create using technological platforms in both private and social contexts. A conceptual framework was developed by integrating the theory of technological paradoxes with co-creation literature. Additionally, a social-exchange perspective was adopted to rationalise the differences in private-social contexts and the moderating effects on consumer co-creation motives. The study data (n = 500) were collected using a questionnaire survey and analysed using structural equation modelling. The paradoxical motives of empowerment and shared responsibility were found to be significant contributors to consumers' willingness to co-create, confirming the independence/jointness paradox that shapes technology -mediated service co-creation. Furthermore, the communal setting of C-S platforms tends to suppress con-sumers' empowerment motive, making responsibility-sharing the dominant motive. Therefore, the findings of this study validate (partially with mixed statistical/descriptive evidence) the moderating effect of co-creation contexts on the perceived technological paradox. Finally, this study presents the theoretical and practical im-plications of the research findings.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Value co-creation and co-destruction in self-service technology: A customer?s perspective
    Hsu, Pei-Fang
    Nguyen, Tuan Kellan
    Huang, Jou-Yu
    [J]. ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 46
  • [2] Self-service technology complaint channel choice Exploring consumers' motives
    Robertson, Nichola
    [J]. MANAGING SERVICE QUALITY, 2012, 22 (02): : 145 - 164
  • [3] Theorizing the Costs of Self-Service Technologies and Co-Creation by Design
    Darmody, Aron
    Zwick, Detlev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACROMARKETING, 2024, 44 (01) : 6 - 13
  • [4] Online Consumers' Satisfaction in Self-Collection: Value Co-Creation from the Service Fairness Perspective
    Wang, Xueqin
    Yuen, Kum Fai
    Teo, Chee-Chong
    Wong, Yiik Diew
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2021, 25 (02) : 230 - 260
  • [5] Institutions and technology in the value co-creation process of restaurant consumers: a service-dominant logic perspective
    Scarlett, Gabriella
    Reksoprawiro, Ricky
    Amelia, Novi
    Wibowo, Alexander Joseph Ibnu
    [J]. TQM JOURNAL, 2022, 34 (03): : 357 - 376
  • [6] Is ChatGPT the right technology for service individualization and value co-creation? evidence from the travel industry
    Demir, Mahmut
    Demir, Sirvan Sen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAVEL & TOURISM MARKETING, 2023, 40 (05) : 383 - 398
  • [7] Smart sensing technology and self-adjustment in service systems through value co-creation routine dynamics
    Mele, Cristina
    Tuominen, Tiina
    Edvardsson, Bo
    Reynoso, Javier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 159
  • [8] Information and communication technology-based service platform enabling the co-creation of agrometeorological services: A case study of the Laos Climate Services for Agriculture
    Kim, Kwang-Hyung
    Petri, Monica
    Inthipunya, Khambane
    Manivong, Viengxai
    Han, Juhyeong
    Park, Jongsun
    Palao, Leo Kris
    Phouthanoxay, Sengduangduan
    Keomanivong, Sengkeo
    Silattana, Sengchanh
    Chanthavong, Viengkham
    Phommaya, Sayphone
    Siyavong, Phousavanh
    [J]. CLIMATE SERVICES, 2022, 27
  • [9] Towards a service-dominant platform for public value co-creation in a smart city: Evidence from two metropolitan cities in China
    Yu, Jiang
    Wen, Yating
    Jin, Jing
    Zhang, Yue
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 142 : 168 - 182