Nonadditive best-worst method: Incorporating criteria interaction using the Choquet integral

被引:7
|
作者
Liang, Yingying [1 ]
Ju, Yanbing [1 ]
Tu, Yan [2 ]
Rezaei, Jafar [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Safety Sci & Emergency Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Delft, Netherlands
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multicriteria decision-making; Best-worst method; Choquet integral; Criteria interaction;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2022.2096504
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The best-worst method (BWM) is a multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) method to derive the relative importance (weight) of a set of criteria used to evaluate a set of alternatives. Several models (e.g., nonlinear, linear, Bayesian, and multiplicative) have been developed to find the weights based on the provided pairwise comparisons, conducted among the criteria, by the decision-maker(s)/expert(s). The existing BWM models, however, do not handle interactions that might exist between the criteria encountered in a decision problem. In this study, a nonadditive BWM is developed that considers possible interactions between the criteria. To this end, we use the Choquet integral, one of the most widely accepted techniques, to incorporate criteria interactions. A nonlinear optimization model is introduced to minimize the maximum deviation of the obtained weights from the provided pairwise comparisons, considering the information about the interactions between the criteria. We then introduce a linear variant of the nonadditive BWM and discuss its property compared to the nonlinear model. The applicability of the proposed approach is demonstrated through a real-world case study of a battery-powered electric vehicle (BEV) selection problem.
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1506
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of Environmental Performance Criteria in Textile Industry Using the Best-Worst Method
    Gbolarumi, Fadara Taiwo
    Wong, Kuan Yew
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2021, 2022, : 160 - 174
  • [2] The Balancing Role of Best and Worst in Best-Worst Method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2021, 2022, : 1 - 15
  • [3] The behavioural best-worst method
    Kheybari, Siamak
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 209
  • [4] Best-worst Tradeoff method
    Liang, Fuqi
    Brunelli, Matteo
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 610 : 957 - 976
  • [5] A neutrosophic enhanced best-worst method for considering decision-makers' confidence in the best and worst criteria
    Vafadarnikjoo, Amin
    Tavana, Madjid
    Botelho, Tiago
    Chalvatzis, Konstantinos
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 289 (02) : 391 - 418
  • [6] A multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria decision making
    Brunelli, Matteo
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 47 (01) : 12 - 15
  • [7] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [8] Best-worst method for robot selection
    Ali, Asif
    Rashid, Tabasam
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (01) : 563 - 583
  • [9] Priority ranking for the best-worst method
    Tu, Jiancheng
    Wu, Zhibin
    Pedrycz, Witold
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 635 : 42 - 55
  • [10] An analytical framework for the best-worst method
    Wu, Qun
    Liu, Xinwang
    Zhou, Ligang
    Qin, Jindong
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2024, 123