ESG performance and investment efficiency: The impact of information asymmetry

被引:40
|
作者
Bilyay-Erdogan, Seda [1 ]
Danisman, Gamze Ozturk [2 ]
Demir, Ender [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kadir Has Univ, Fac Econ Adm & Social Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Bilgi Univ, Fac Business, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Reykjavik Univ, Sch Social Sci, Dept Business Adm, Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Fac Management & Econ, Dept Business Adm, Zlin, Czech Republic
关键词
ESG Performance; Investment Efficiency; Overinvestment; Underinvestment; Information Asymmetry; Europe; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FINANCIAL-REPORTING QUALITY; AGENCY COSTS; NONFINANCIAL DISCLOSURE; RISK-MANAGEMENT; CASH FLOW; FIRM; EQUITY; INEFFICIENCY; CONSTRAINTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101919
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the relationship between firms' engagement in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activities and corporate investment efficiency, using 1,094 firms from 21 countries in Europe, covering the years 2002-2019. We conduct our estimations using fixed effects panel data techniques and address potential endogeneity with instrumental variables (IV) estimations. We provide evidence that overall ESG engagement is positively and significantly associated with investment efficiency. Analyzing overinvestment and underinvestment scenarios shows that ESG engagement decreases only overinvestment problems. Within the underinvestment scenario, we observe that ESG engagement is beneficial only for firms with higher information asymmetries. Thus, information asymmetry matters in the underinvestment case. We next show that four firm-level channels-information asymmetry, financial constraints, cash flows, and risk-link ESG performance to investment inefficiency. Additional analysis shows that firms with extreme ESG scores (i.e., very low and very high) do not experience significant reductions in investment inefficiency. Altogether, our findings draw attention to the critical role of ESG performance and information asymmetry in determining corporate investment efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ESG performance and investment efficiency
    Lian, Yuanqiang
    Weng, Xiaowen
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 62
  • [2] Information asymmetry and investment efficiency: the role of blockholders
    Khan, Mubashir Ali
    Yau, Josephine Tan-Hwang
    Sarang, Aitzaz Ahsan Alias
    Gull, Ammar Ali
    Javed, Muzhar
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2025, 26 (01) : 194 - 221
  • [3] The Impact of Political Connection and Information Asymmetry on Investment Efficiency: Evidence from China
    Yu, Hui-Fun
    Lin, Tsui-Jung
    Chang, Hai-Yen
    Wang, Yu-Huai
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14)
  • [4] Corporate ESG performance and human capital investment efficiency
    Song, Jiayi
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 62
  • [5] The impact of ESG disclosures and institutional ownership on market information asymmetry
    Siew, Renard Y. J.
    Balatbat, Maria C. A.
    Carmichael, David G.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2016, 23 (04) : 432 - 448
  • [6] Impact of ESG disclosure and financial reporting quality on investment efficiency
    Ellili, Nejla Ould Daoud
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2022, 22 (05): : 1094 - 1111
  • [7] ESG Performance, Demographic Trend, and Labour Investment Efficiency in China
    Su, Jun
    Xue, Lin
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 31 (20) : 2207 - 2213
  • [8] Institutional investors' site visits, information asymmetry, and investment efficiency
    Zhao, Lei
    Li, Na
    Wu, Yanjun
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 88
  • [9] ESG performance and corporate labor investment efficiency: Evidence from China
    Yang, Xiangyang
    Wang, Cong
    Liu, Bei
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2025, 98
  • [10] Investment efficiency, ESG performance and corporate performance: evidence from Chinese listed enterprises
    Gao, Daquan
    Li, Songsong
    Zhou, Yan
    CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2025, 19 (02) : 567 - 599