共 48 条
Artificial- intelligence- enhanced synthetic thick slabs versus standard slices in digital breast tomosynthesis
被引:1
|作者:
Sauer, Stephanie Tina
[1
]
Christner, Sara Aniki
[1
]
Kuhl, Philipp Josef
[1
]
Kunz, Andreas Steven
[1
]
Huflage, Henner
[1
]
Luetkens, Karsten Sebastian
[1
]
Schlaiss, Tanja
[2
]
Bley, Thorsten Alexander
[1
]
Grunz, Jan-peter
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Hosp Wurzburg, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Oberdurrbacher Str, Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Wurzburg, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Josef Schneider Str, Wurzburg, Germany
来源:
关键词:
2D MAMMOGRAPHY;
READING TIME;
CANCER;
PERFORMANCE;
ACCURACY;
SOCIETY;
READER;
IMPACT;
D O I:
10.1259/bjr.20220967
中图分类号:
R8 [特种医学];
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100207 ;
1009 ;
摘要:
Objectives: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) can provide additional information over mammography, albeit at the cost of prolonged reading time. This study retrospectively investigated the impact of reading enhanced synthetic 6 mm slabs instead of standard 1 mm slices on interpretation time and readers performance in a diagnostic assessment centre.Methods: Three radiologists (R1- 3; 6/4/2 years of breast imaging experience) reviewed 111 diagnostic DBT exam- inations. Two datasets were interpreted independently for each patient, with one set containing artificial- intelligence- enhanced synthetic 6 mm slabs with 3 mm overlap, while the other set comprised standard 1 mm slices. Blinded to histology and follow - up, readers noted individual BIRADS categories and diagnostic confidence while reading time was recorded. Among the 111 exami- nations, 70 findings were histopathologically correlated including 56 malignancies.Results: No significant difference was found between BIRADS categories assigned based on 6 mm vs 1 mm datasets (p >= 0.317). Diagnostic accuracy was compa- rable for 6 mm and 1 mm readings (R1: 87.0% vs 87.0%; R2: 86.1% vs 87.0%; R3: 80.0% vs 84.4%; p >= 0.125) with high interrater agreement (intraclass correlation coeffi- cient 0.848 vs 0.865). One reader reported higher confi- dence with 1 mm slices (R1: p=0.033). Reading time was substantially shorter when interpreting 6 mm slabs compared to 1 mm slices (R1: 33.5 vs 46.2; R2: 49.1 vs 64.8; R3: 39.5 vs 67.2 sec; all p < 0.001).Conclusions: Artificial-intelligence-enhanced synthetic 6 mm slabs allow for substantial interpretation time reduction in diagnostic DBT without a decrease in reader accuracy.Advances in knowledge: A simplified slab - only protocol instead of 1 mm slices may offset the higher reading time without a loss of diagnosis- relevant image information in first and second readings. Further evaluations are required regarding workflow implications, particularly in screening settings.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文