Smokestack gas velocity measurements using 3D pitot tubes in a coal-fired power plant

被引:2
|
作者
Im, Sunghyuk [1 ]
Nguyen, Doan Trang [1 ]
Choi, Yong Moon [1 ]
Shin, Jinwoo [1 ]
Kang, Woong [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Res Inst Stand & Sci, 267 Gajeong Ro, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词
Carbon neutrality; Greenhouse gas emissions; Smokestack gas velocity; Volumetric gas flow rate measurement; 3D pitot tube; Prism pitot tube; Sphere pitot tube; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2023.102347
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
On the path to carbon neutrality to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the Korean government has mandated legislation for controlling and monitoring GHG emissions emitted from smokestacks. A continuous emission measurement (CEM) method is considered to be the most reliable for determining CO2 emissions from stationary sources. In Korea, an S-type Pitot tube is the most popular technique to measure the gas velocity in a smokestack, but it will result in a certain error when the non-axial velocity components exist. To vanquish this limitation, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) developed a nulling smokestack flow measurement (NSFM) instrument equipped with 3D Pitot tubes for taking on-site stack gas velocity measurements. 3D Pitot tubes used in this research, such as prism Pitot tube and sphere Pitot tube, are calibrated in the KRISS airspeed system. The instrument using 3D Pitot tubes with the nulling technique is expected to diminish the restriction on S-type Pitot tubes, and to enhance the quality of the GHG emission measurements in the smokestack. The 3D Pitot tubes can measure both axial and non-axial velocity components of a flow, whereas the S-type Pitot tubes can measure only the axial velocity component. The averaged axial velocity of the stack gas as measured by this instrument has expanded uncertainty of 3.3% (P = 95%, k = 2) for both prism and sphere Pitot tubes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flue gas desulfurization methods in coal-fired power plant
    Michalski, Jacek A.
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2017, 96 (04): : 731 - 736
  • [2] Research progress of surface modification on coal-fired power plant boiler tubes
    Zhou Y.
    Lu J.
    Gu Y.
    1600, Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering (37): : 149 - 160
  • [3] Modeling mercury capture in coal-fired power plant flue gas
    Scala, F
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2004, 43 (10) : 2575 - 2589
  • [4] Prediction of corrosive Gas Atmospheres in the Combustion Chamber of a Coal-fired Power Plant
    von Bohnstein, Maximilian
    Stroh, Alexander
    Stroehle, Jochen
    Epple, Bernd
    28 DEUTSCHER FLAMMENTAG: VERBRENNUNG UND FEUERUNG, 2017, 2017, 2302 : 563 - 572
  • [5] SULFUR GAS TO PARTICLE CONVERSION IN PLUME OF A COAL-FIRED POWER-PLANT
    PUESCHEL, RF
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1976, 57 (04): : 252 - 252
  • [6] Flue Gas Heat Recovery in High Efficient Coal-fired Power Plant
    Buchta, Janusz
    Oziemski, Andrzej
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 20TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING (EPE), 2019, : 507 - 512
  • [7] Case Study on Fireside Erosion of Platen Superheater Boiler Tubes of a Coal-Fired Power Plant
    D. N. Adnyana
    Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2022, 22 : 1578 - 1589
  • [8] Case Study on Fireside Erosion of Platen Superheater Boiler Tubes of a Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Adnyana, D. N.
    JOURNAL OF FAILURE ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2022, 22 (04) : 1578 - 1589
  • [9] Monitoring of Oxygen Content in the Flue Gas at a Coal-Fired Power Plant Using Cloud Modeling Techniques
    Han, Xiaojuan
    Yan, Yong
    Cheng, Cheng
    Chen, Yueyan
    Zhu, Yanglin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2014, 63 (04) : 953 - 963
  • [10] Exergetic analysis and evaluation of coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant and natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant
    V. Siva Reddy
    S. C. Kaushik
    S. K. Tyagi
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2014, 16 : 489 - 499