THE ROLE OF THE SUPPORT OF TOP MANAGEMENT IN GENDER EQUALITY OUTCOMES IN HIGHER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH

被引:0
|
作者
Tardos, Katalin [1 ,2 ]
Paksi, Veronika [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] HUN REN Ctr Social Sci, Inst Sociol, Budapest, Hungary
[2] Int Business Sch, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Univ Szeged, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Sociol, Szeged, Hungary
来源
FEMINISMO-S | 2024年 / 43期
关键词
gender equality; diversity management; Sustainable Development Goals; gender equality outcomes; top management; higher education; RDI; strategic approach to gender equality; SDG #5; WORK-LIFE BALANCE; FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.14198/fem.2024.43.11
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In the past decade, there has been increasing attention globally to the institutionalisation of diversity management practices in research, development and innovation (RDI) organisations, as well as the necessity of addressing more effectively various forms of discrimination and inequalities, especially agendas of gender inequality. Although there is extensive research on the different forms, levels, and reasons for gender inequality in RDI organisations, relatively little research has examined how top management members perceive the importance of the former. Our research examines how gender equality outcomes might differ for higher education and research-performing organisations in Hungary when top management strategically supports gender equality. For this purpose, we use -among the indicators by which the European Union (EU) measures progress related to achieving Sustainable Developmental Goal #5 on Gender Equality- the gender employment gap, the gender pay gap, and positions held by women in senior management. We applied a quantitative approach, using an online questionnaire to survey forty-eight higher education institutions and research centres. Our findings build on a comparison of two subsamples; the first in which top management attributes strategic importance to gender equality, and the second in which this strategic approach is lacking. The results show that the << strategic >> subsample can primarily be differentiated from the << non-strategic >> subsample due to the former's implementation of significantly more gender equality initiatives at the individual and cultural levels. Concerning initiatives on the structural and organisational level, no significant difference could be found. Furthermore, while a positive linear relationship was found between the number of gender equality practices and the number of positive gender equality outcomes, comparing gender equality outcomes in the two subsamples in more detail indicated fewer significant differences.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gender equality in higher education and research
    Rosa, Rodrigo
    Clavero, Sara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENDER STUDIES, 2022, 31 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [2] Research on effect of equality of public support of the mystification of higher education
    Chen Ai-juan
    Ji Hong-fei
    [J]. 2011 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND SPORTS EDUCATION (ESE 2011), VOL V, 2011, : 96 - 100
  • [3] Women and Gender Equality in Higher Education?
    David, Miriam E.
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2015, 5 (01) : 10 - 25
  • [4] Women, higher education and gender equality
    Miranda Guerrero, Roberto
    [J]. CPU-E REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION EDUCATIVA, 2007, (04): : 139 - 168
  • [5] Gender equality policies and higher education careers
    Berggren, Caroline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND WORK, 2011, 24 (1-2) : 141 - 161
  • [6] Towards Higher Education in Gender: Communication and Equality
    Rodriguez Wangueemert, Carmen
    Matud Aznar, Maria del Pilar
    Pestano Rodriguez, Jose Manuel
    [J]. HISTORIA Y COMUNICACION SOCIAL, 2013, 18 : 743 - 755
  • [7] Improving Gender Equality in Higher Education in Turkey
    Aktas, Semra Gunay
    Kumtepe, Evrim Genc
    Kantar, Yeliz Mert
    Ulukan, Ibrahim Cemil
    Aydin, Sinan
    Aksoy, Talha
    Er, Fikret
    [J]. APPLIED SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2019, 12 (01) : 167 - 189
  • [8] Improving Gender Equality in Higher Education in Turkey
    Semra Gunay Aktas
    Evrim Genc Kumtepe
    Yeliz Mert Kantar
    Ibrahim Cemil Ulukan
    Sinan Aydin
    Talha Aksoy
    Fikret Er
    [J]. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 2019, 12 : 167 - 189
  • [9] Gender hierarchy to gender equality: an agenda for transition in higher education
    Agarwala, Tanuja
    [J]. GENDER IN MANAGEMENT, 2015, 30 (05):
  • [10] Gender and sexuality: the discursive limits of 'equality' in higher education
    Morrish, Liz
    Sauntson, Helen
    [J]. LEARNING AND TEACHING-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2010, 3 (02) : 1 - 18