共 23 条
Students' Perspectives on Basic and Clinical Science Integration When Step 1 is Administered After the Core Clerkships
被引:3
|作者:
Kercheval, Jacquelyn B.
[1
,2
]
Mott, Nicole M.
[2
]
Kim, Eric K.
[3
]
Boscardin, Christy K.
[4
]
Klein, Barbie A.
[5
]
Hauer, Karen E.
[4
]
Daniel, Michelle
[2
,6
]
机构:
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Off Med Student Educ, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Undergrad Med Educ, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Anat, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词:
cognitive integration;
clinical science;
basic science;
USMLE Step 1;
modeling;
MEDICAL-EDUCATION;
COGNITIVE APPRENTICESHIP;
BIOMEDICAL KNOWLEDGE;
CURRICULUM;
CLASSROOM;
D O I:
10.1080/10401334.2022.2030235
中图分类号:
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号:
040101 ;
120403 ;
摘要:
Phenomenon: According to adult learning theories, effective cognitive integration of basic and clinical science may promote the transfer of knowledge to patient care. The placement of the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 after the core clerkships is one strategy intended to facilitate cognitive integration, though learner experiences with this model are unexplored. The purpose of this study is to understand students' perspectives on basic and clinical science integration in a post-clerkship Step 1 curriculum. Approach: Focus groups were conducted between August and September 2020 with senior medical students from the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine and University of Michigan Medical School. Data were analyzed using a constructivist approach to thematic analysis. Findings: Thirty-three students participated in six focus groups. Participants described multiple barriers to cognitive integration in the clerkship learning environment, though they also identified examples of teaching and learning that facilitated integration. Early in their clerkships, students struggled to integrate because of their tenuous basic science foundation, cognitive overload, and difficulty perceiving the relevance of basic science to patient care. They felt that educators primarily focused on clinical science, and many basic science teaching sessions during clerkships felt irrelevant to patient care. However, students also described experiences that made the connection between basic and clinical science more explicit, including modeling by educators and clerkship learning activities that more overtly encouraged the application of basic science to clinical care. In addition, the return to basic science studying during the post-clerkship dedicated Step 1 study period offered powerful integration opportunities. These facilitators of cognitive integration helped students recognize the value of integration for enduring learning. Insights: There are myriad barriers to cognitive integration of basic and clinical science during clerkships in a post-clerkship Step 1 curriculum. The relevance of basic science to patient care needs to be made more explicit to students through modeling by clinician educators to augment the potential benefits of curricular change. The post-clerkship Step 1 study period appears to offer a unique opportunity for cognitive integration later in a learner's trajectory that may be related to curricular design. When learners recognize the applicability of basic science to patient care, they may more intentionally transfer basic science knowledge to clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 127
页数:11
相关论文