Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) and genome editing to support a sustainable livestock

被引:0
|
作者
Menchaca, Alejo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Invest Agr, Plataforma Salud Anim, Montevideo, Uruguay
[2] Fdn Inst Reprod Anim Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay
关键词
FTAI; MOET; PIV; sex-sorted semen; CRISPR; CATTLE; BEEF;
D O I
10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0074
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This article provides an overview of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and genome engineering to improve livestock production systems for the contribution of global sustainability. Most ruminant production systems are conducted on grassland conditions, as is the case of South American countries that are leaders in meat and milk production worldwide with a well-established grass-feed livestock. These systems have many strengths from an environmental perspective and consumer preferences but requires certain improvements to enhance resource efficiency. Reproductive performance is one of the main challenges particularly in cow-calf operations that usually are conducted under adverse conditions and thus ART can make a great contribution. Fixed-time artificial insemination is applied in South America in large scale programs as 20 to 30% of cows receive this technology every year in each country, with greater calving rate and significant herd genetic gain occurred in this region. Sexed semen has also been increasingly implemented, enhancing resource efficiency by a) obtaining desired female replacement and improving animal welfare by avoiding newborn male sacrifice in dairy industry, or b) alternatively producing male calves for beef industry. In vitro embryo production has been massively applied, with this region showing the greatest number of embryos produced worldwide leading to significant improvement in herd genetics and productivity. Although the contribution of these technologies is considerable, further improvements will be required for a significant livestock transformation and novel biotechnologies such as genome editing are already available. Through the CRISPR/Cas-based system it is possible to enhance food yield and quality, avoid animal welfare concerns, overcome animal health threats, and control pests and invasive species harming food production. In summary, a significant enhancement in livestock productivity and resource efficiency can be made through reproductive technologies and genome editing, improving at the same time profitability for farmers, and global food security and sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On-Farm Livestock Genome Editing Using Cutting Edge Reproductive Technologies
    McFarlane, Gus R.
    Salvesen, Hamish A.
    Sternberg, Anna
    Lillico, Simon G.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2019, 3
  • [2] Sustainable Food Production: The Contribution of Genome Editing in Livestock
    Menchaca, Alejo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [3] Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies for Livestock Development
    Chakravarthi, Vikrama P.
    Balaji, N. Sri
    [J]. VETERINARY WORLD, 2010, 3 (05) : 238 - 240
  • [4] Potentials, prospects and applications of genome editing technologies in livestock production
    Raza, Sayed Haidar Abbas
    Hassanin, Abdallah A.
    Pant, Sameer D.
    Bing, Sun
    Sitohy, Mahmoud Z.
    Abdelnour, Sameh A.
    Alotaibi, Mashael Alhumaidi
    Al-Hazani, Tahani Mohamed
    Abd El-Aziz, Ayman H.
    Cheng, Gong
    Zan, Linsen
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (04) : 1928 - 1935
  • [5] Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) with Baboons
    Simerly, Calvin R.
    Castro, Carlos A.
    Grund, Kevin
    Turpin, Janet
    McFarland, David
    Champagne, Jamie
    Jimenez, Joe B.
    Frost, Pat
    Hewitson, Larua
    Schatten, Gerald
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2009, : 123 - 124
  • [6] Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in water buffaloes
    Baruselli, Pietro S.
    Soares, Julia G.
    Bayeux, Bernardo M.
    Silva, Julio C. B.
    Mingoti, Rodolfo D.
    Carvalho, Nelcio A. T.
    [J]. ANIMAL REPRODUCTION, 2018, 15 : 971 - 983
  • [7] Endometrioma and assisted reproductive technologies (ART): Trends
    Yazbeck, C.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2013, 41 (7-8): : 417 - 418
  • [8] Embryo loss in assisted reproductive technologies (ART).
    Kovalevsky, G
    Patrizio, P
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) : S256 - S256
  • [9] Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and placental abnormalities
    Cochrane, Elizabeth
    Pando, Christine
    Kirschen, Gregory W.
    Soucier, Devon
    Fuchs, Anna
    Garry, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (08) : 825 - 828
  • [10] Genome Editing Tools in Livestock
    Kumari, Pathak Shalu
    [J]. RESEARCH JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 15 (08): : 145 - 151