Clinical benefits and economic cost-savings of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention

被引:5
|
作者
Cowan, Robert [1 ]
Stark-Inbar, Alit [2 ]
Rabany, Liron [2 ]
Harris, Dagan [2 ]
Vizel, Maya [2 ]
Ironi, Alon [2 ]
Vieira, Julio R. R. [3 ,4 ]
Galen, Michelle [5 ]
Treppendahl, Christina [6 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Div Headache Med, Palo Alto, CA USA
[2] Theranica Ltd, Ha Omanut 4, Netanya, Israel
[3] Nuvance Hlth Neurosci Inst, Kingston, NY USA
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Saul R Korey Dept Neurol, Bronx, NY USA
[5] Deaconess Res Inst, Newburgh, IN USA
[6] Headache Neurol Res Inst, Ridgeland, MS USA
关键词
Prevention; migraine; headache; health economics; cost-benefit; HEOR; employers; remote electrical neuromodulation; REN; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RESOURCE UTILIZATION; EPISODIC MIGRAINE; DOUBLE-BLIND; BURDEN; IMPACT; PAIN; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2023.2205751
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Migraine affects more than 1 billion people worldwide, causing significant disability and substantial clinical economic burden. Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) is a prescribed, wearable, non-pharmacological, non-invasive device (Nerivio), indicated for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 12 years and older. Efficacy of REN for migraine prevention was recently demonstrated in a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical-trial. This study further analyzes clinical benefits from endpoints measured in the clinical-trial as well as their associated direct and indirect costs. Out of 248 subjects randomized (128 active, 120 placebo), 179 (95:84) qualified for modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Significant therapeutic gains favoring REN over placebo were found, including an average reduction of 3.4 acute medication days/month, and an average reduction of 2.7 presenteeism days/month. A reduction in the number of provider visits and absenteeism days was also reported, though not significantly differed from changes in the control group. Mean annual cost-saving from reductions in these four clinical outcomes relative to baseline without REN treatment for a patient using REN for migraine prevention estimated $10,000. Extrapolated to a hypothetical US commercial health-plan of one million covered lives, annual mean cost-saving from using REN for migraine prevention is estimated to be $560.0 million, composed of $327.8 million direct costs and $232.2 million indirect costs. Thus, REN preventive treatment for migraine reduces disease burden and leads to meaningful cost-saving, both direct and indirect, proposing clinical and financial incentives for patients, health insurance systems, and employers to utilize REN for migraine prevention. Aims Assess the clinical benefits and associated direct and indirect cost-savings from Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention. Methods REN, a prescribed, wearable, FDA-cleared neuromodulation-device for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine, recently demonstrated efficacy for migraine prevention when used every-other-day, in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study. Following baseline (4-weeks), subjects underwent treatment with REN or placebo (8-weeks), and electronically reported migraine symptoms and acute treatments daily. Therapeutic-gain was the between-groups difference (REN minus placebo) in change from baseline to the second month of intervention. Health-economics impact was derived as cost-savings associated with REN's clinical benefits. Results Out of 248 subjects randomized (128 active, 120 placebo), 179 (95:84) qualified for modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Significant therapeutic gains favoring REN vs. placebo were found (Tepper et al. 2023), including mean (+/- SD) reduction in number of acute medication days (3.5 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.5; gain = 2.2; p = .001) and presenteeism days (2.7 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.4; gain = 1.6, p = .001). Mean changes of provider visits (reduction of 0.09 +/- 0.1 vs. increase of 0.08 +/- 0.2; p = .297), and reduction of absenteeism days (0.07 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.07 +/- 0.2; p = .997) were not significant. Mean annual cost-saving for one patient using REN for migraine prevention estimated $10,000 (+/-$1,777) from reductions in these four clinical outcomes relative to baseline without REN treatment. Extrapolated to a hypothetical US commercial health-plan of one-million covered lives, assuming the national prevalence of migraine patients on preventive treatment, annual mean (+/- SE) cost-saving from using REN migraine prevention estimated $560.0 million (+/-$99.5 million) from reduction in direct (similar to$330 millionm) and indirect costs (similar to$230 millionm) measured. Limitations Clinical and cost-savings benefits presented are conservative, assessed only from endpoints measured in the clinical trial. Moreover, some of the endpoints had only scarce or no occurrences during the study period. Conclusions Coverage of the REN-device for migraine prevention may significantly reduce disease-burden and save a one-million-member payer plan at least $560 million per year.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 664
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Temporal Analysis of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) in Migraine Prevention
    Blumenfeld, A.
    Rabany, L.
    Stark-Inbar, A.
    Garas, S.
    Ironi, A.
    Harriott, A.
    Singh, Halker R.
    HEADACHE, 2023, 63 : 171 - 172
  • [2] Time-course Analysis of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for Migraine Prevention
    Blumenfeld, Andrew
    Rabany, Liron
    Ironi, Alon
    Stark-Inbar, Alit
    Harris, Dagan
    Harriott, Andrea
    Singh, Rashmi Halker
    CEPHALALGIA, 2023, 43 (1supp) : 65 - 66
  • [3] Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for the Acute Treatment of Migraine
    Rapoport, Alan M.
    Lin, Tamar
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    HEADACHE, 2020, 60 (01): : 229 - 234
  • [4] Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for acute treatment of migraine in adolescents suggests preventive benefits
    Monteith, T.
    Stark-Inbar, A.
    Shmuely, S.
    Harris, D.
    Ironi, A.
    Kalika, P.
    Irwin, S.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2023, 94 : S139 - S139
  • [5] Frequent Use of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for Acute Treatment of Migraine Suggests Preventive Benefits in Adolescents
    Monteith, T.
    Stark-Inbar, A.
    Shmuely, S.
    Garas, S.
    Ironi, A.
    Irwin, S.
    HEADACHE, 2023, 63 : 140 - 141
  • [6] Significant reduction in migraine days with Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention: A double-blind randomized sham-controlled clinical trial
    Tepper, Stewart
    Rabany, Liron
    Cowan, Robert
    Smith, Timothy
    Grosberg, Brian
    Torphy, Brad
    Harris, Dagan
    Vizel, Maya
    Ironi, Alon
    Stark-Inbar, Alit
    Garas, Sandy
    Blumenfeld, Andrew
    NEUROLOGY, 2023, 100 (17)
  • [7] Cost-savings and economic benefits due to the Assistive Robotic Manipulator (ARM)
    Römer, GRBE
    Stuyt, HJA
    Peters, A
    2005 IEEE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REHABILITATION ROBOTICS, 2005, : 201 - 204
  • [8] What to evaluate in prevention outcomes: Effectiveness, Cost-benefits, Cost-savings, Equity
    Cislaghi, Cesare
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE, 2018, 42 (5-6): : 372 - 375
  • [9] Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) in the acute treatment of migraine: a comparison with usual care and acute migraine medications
    Rapoport, Alan M.
    Bonner, Jo H.
    Lin, Tamar
    Harris, Dagan
    Gruper, Yaron
    Ironi, Alon
    Cowan, Robert P.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2019, 20 (1):
  • [10] Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) in the acute treatment of migraine: a comparison with usual care and acute migraine medications
    Alan M. Rapoport
    Jo H. Bonner
    Tamar Lin
    Dagan Harris
    Yaron Gruper
    Alon Ironi
    Robert P. Cowan
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2019, 20