Reliability assessments for two types of balanced systems with multi-state protective devices

被引:32
|
作者
Wang, Xiaoyue [1 ]
Ning, Ru [1 ]
Zhao, Xian [2 ]
Wu, Congshan [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch E Business & Logist, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Balanced system; Protective device; Reliability analyses; Markov process imbedding method;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2022.108852
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the existing studies, the positive effects of a protective device on the reliability of balanced systems have not been attached importance, and the research on protective devices is limited and insufficient with respect to the triggering and protection mechanisms. Driven by practical engineering applications, this paper establishes two reliability models for balanced systems with multi-state protective devices from the perspectives of dynamic and static balanced concepts, respectively. The rebalanced mechanisms are considered in the proposed dynamic balanced system, and system imbalance is included in the failure criteria of the proposed static balanced system. In both models, new triggering mechanisms of protective devices are proposed based on the respective char-acteristics of the balanced systems. Moreover, variable protection mechanisms of the devices are proposed by introducing different reduction factors when the protective device operates in different stages. The protective devices reduce the integrated impact of shocks and internal degradation exerted on the units in the new models. The Markov process imbedding method combined with Monte-Carlo simulation is employed to derive the reli-ability of the proposed models. The applicability of proposed systems and correctness of the method are validated by practical engineering applications.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability analysis of a system including multi-state demand-based subsystems supported by protective devices considering two types of triggering errors
    Zhao, Xian
    Li, Ziyue
    Wang, Xiaoyue
    Guo, Bin
    Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2024, 198
  • [2] Reliability analysis of multi-state balanced systems with standby components switching mechanism
    Zhao, Xian
    Wang, Chen
    Wang, Siqi
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 242
  • [3] Reliability of multi-state systems with two failure-modes
    Levitin, G
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2003, 52 (03) : 340 - 348
  • [4] Reliability Evaluation of Multi-state Systems
    Wu, Yueqin
    Ren, Zhanyong
    Zeng, Zhaoyang
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY, MAINTAINABILITY AND SAFETY, VOLS I AND II: HIGHLY RELIABLE, EASY TO MAINTAIN AND READY TO SUPPORT, 2009, : 111 - 115
  • [5] Multi-state balanced systems in a shock environment
    Zhao, Xian
    Wang, Siqi
    Wang, Xiaoyue
    Fan, Yu
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 193
  • [6] System of Systems Reliability for Multi-State Systems
    Cook, Jason L.
    ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2009 PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 13 - 18
  • [7] Multi-state component criticality analysis for reliability improvement in multi-state systems
    Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel
    Colt, David W.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2007, 92 (12) : 1608 - 1619
  • [8] Reliability optimization of multi-state systems with two performance sharing groups
    Gu, Liudong
    Wang, Guanjun
    Zhou, Yifan
    Peng, Rui
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 241
  • [9] DYNAMIC RELIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF MULTI-STATE SYSTEMS WITH TWO COMPONENTS
    Eryilmaz, Serkan
    HACETTEPE JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2011, 40 (01): : 125 - 133
  • [10] A Study of Reliability of Multi-State Systems with Two Performance Sharing Groups
    Peng, Rui
    Liu, Hanlin
    Xie, Min
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 32 (07) : 2623 - 2632