Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single center analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Carbonara, Umberto [1 ]
Lippolis, Giuseppe [1 ]
Rella, Luciano [1 ]
Minafra, Paolo [1 ]
Guglielmi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Vitarelli, Antonio [1 ]
Lucarelli, Giuseppe [1 ]
Ditonno, Pasquale [1 ]
机构
[1] Aldo Moro Univ, Dept Emergency & Organ Transplantat, Urol Unit, Bari, Italy
关键词
Prostate cancer; Robotic; Perineal; Radical prostatectomy; Continence; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; Nerve; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; RISK; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajur.2023.05.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: In the last 10 years, robotic platforms allowed to resume of some alternative surgical approaches, including perineal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (p-RARP). Herein, we present in detail the oncological and functional outcomes of patients who underwent p-RARP with a median follow-up of 30 months.Methods: Patients presenting low-or intermediate-risk prostate cancer and prostate volume up to 60 mL who underwent p-RARP between November 2018 and November 2022 were selected. Baseline, intraoperative, pathological, and postoperative data were collected and then analyzed.Results: Thirty-seven p-RARP cases were included. Such patients presented mean age of 62 years and a mean Charlson comorbidity index of 4. Body mass index of >= 25 kg/m(2) was reported by 24 (64.9%) patients, as well as 7 (18.9%) patients reported a past surgical history. Mean prostate volume and median prostate-specific antigen were 41 mL and 6.2 ng/mL, respectively. The median operative time was 242 min. The positive surgical margin rate was 45.9%. In terms of postoperative complications, 10 patients reported complications with any grade; however, a single case (2.7%) of major (Clavien-Dindo grade >= 3) complication was observed. No patient with biochemical recurrence or distant metastasis was reported at 2 years of follow-up. Recovery of continence rates were 67.6%, 75.7%, and 92.9%, at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery, respectively.Conclusion: p-RARP is a challenging but safe minimally invasive approach for selected patients with prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy, showing outstanding functional recovery. Despite positive surgical margin rates being relatively high, no cases of biochemical recurrence or distant metastasis were reported after a median follow-up of 30 months.(c) 2023 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 430
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LONG-TERM FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Abdollah, Firas
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Sammon, Jesse
    Sood, Akshay
    Fossati, Nicola
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Gaboardi, Franco
    Rogers, Craig
    Peabody, James
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    Menon, Mani
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E1051 - E1052
  • [2] Comparison of surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer
    Inkaya, Abdurrahman
    Tahra, Ahmet
    Sobay, Resul
    Kumcu, Ali
    Kucuk, Eyup Veli
    Boylu, Ugur
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 45 (06): : 410 - 417
  • [3] Impact of Prostate Size on the Functional and Oncological Outcomes of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Jaber, Abdel Rahman
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Saikali, Shady
    Gamal, Ahmed
    Perera, Roshane
    Rogers, Travis
    Patel, Ela
    Sandri, Marco
    Tilki, Derya
    Patel, Vipul
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2024, 10 (02): : 263 - 270
  • [4] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of oncological outcomes at a single center
    Okegawa, Takatsugu
    Omura, Shota
    Samejima, Mio
    Ninomiya, Naoki
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Nakamura, Yu
    Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi
    Tambo, Mitsuhiro
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [5] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes
    Boylu, Ugur
    Basatac, Cem
    Turan, Turgay
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Gumus, Eyup
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 38 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [6] Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Yusuf Arikan
    Mithat Eksi
    Ali Ihsan Tasci
    Updates in Surgery, 2023, 75 : 1027 - 1035
  • [7] Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Arikan, Yusuf
    Eksi, Mithat
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2023, 75 (04) : 1027 - 1035
  • [8] ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN ISUP GRADE 5 PROSTATE CANCER
    Govorov, Alexander
    Kolontarev, Konstantin
    Rasner, Pavel
    Dyakov, Vladimir
    Pushkar, Dmitry
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E197 - E198
  • [9] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in elderly patients. Surgical, oncological and functional outcomes
    Porres, D.
    Pfister, D.
    Labanaris, A. P.
    Zugor, V.
    Witt, J. H.
    Heidenreich, A.
    UROLOGE, 2012, 51 (10): : 1424 - +
  • [10] South African single surgeon experience: Comparison of oncological outcomes, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open perineal radical prostatectomy
    Dlamini, Khayalethu C. S.
    Coetzee, Lance J.
    Mathabe, Kgomotso
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025,