Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential® versus robotic approach in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, I. K. [1 ]
Lee, C. S. [2 ]
Bae, J. H. [1 ]
Han, S. R. [1 ]
Alshalawi, W. [1 ,3 ]
Kim, B. C. [1 ]
Lee, I. K. [1 ]
Lee, D. S. [1 ]
Lee, Y. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg,Div Colorectal Surg, Seoul 06591, South Korea
[2] Hansol Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[3] King Saud Med City, Dept Surg, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Articulating instrument; ArtiSential (R); Robotic surgery; Low anterior resection; Rectal cancer; TOTAL-MESORECTAL-EXCISION; ENHANCED RECOVERY; SURGERY; PROTOCOL; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-023-02895-y
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Total mesorectal excision using conventional straight fixed devices may be technically difficult because of the narrow and concave pelvis. Several laparoscopic articulating tools have been introduced as an alternative to robotic systems. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential (R) and robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer.Methods This retrospective study included 682 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer from September 2018 to December 2021. Among them, 82 underwent laparoscopic surgery using ArtiSential (R) (group A) and 201 underwent robotic surgery (group B). A total of 73 [group A; 66.37 +/- 11.62; group B 65.79 +/- 11.34] patients were selected for each group using a propensity score matching analysis.Results There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between group A and B. Mean operative time was longer in group B than A (163.5 +/- 61.9 vs 250.1 +/- 77.6 min, p < 0.001). Mean length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the two groups (6.2 +/- 4.7 vs 6.7 +/- 6.1 days, p = 0.617). Postoperative complications, reoperation, and readmission within 30 days after surgery were similar between the two groups.Pathological findings revealed that the circumferential resection margins were above 10 mm in both groups (11.00 +/- 7.47 vs 10.17 +/- 6.25 mm, p = 0.960). At least 12 lymph nodes were sufficiently harvested, with no significant difference in the number harvested between the groups (20.5 +/- 9.9 vs 19.7 +/- 7.3, p = 0.753).Conclusions Laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential (R) can achieve acceptable clinical and oncologic outcomes. ArtiSential (R), a multi-joint and articulating device, may serve a feasible alternative approach to robotic surgery in rectal cancer.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Li, Zhengbiao
    Wang, Qi
    Ning, Weiwei
    Yang, Qinxu
    Huang, Yong
    Yan, Shuai
    Yang, Bo
    Xie, Ming
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (09): : 6852 - 6860
  • [2] Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Zhengbiao Li
    Qi Wang
    Weiwei Ning
    Qinxu Yang
    Yong Huang
    Shuai Yan
    Bo Yang
    Ming Xie
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 6852 - 6860
  • [3] Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yanlai Sun
    Huirong Xu
    Zengjun Li
    Jianjun Han
    Wentao Song
    Junwei Wang
    Zhongfa Xu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 14
  • [4] Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Sun, Yanlai
    Xu, Huirong
    Li, Zengjun
    Han, Jianjun
    Song, Wentao
    Wang, Junwei
    Xu, Zhongfa
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 14
  • [5] Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis
    Feng, Qingyang
    Ng, Simon S. M.
    Zhang, Zhiyuan
    Lin, Songbin
    Niu, Zhengchuan
    Wei, Ye
    He, Guodong
    Chang, Wenju
    Zhu, Dexiang
    Xu, Jianmin
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 124 (04) : 607 - 618
  • [6] OUTCOMES OF SINGLE-INCISION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR SIGMOID COLON CANCER: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS
    Kim, C.
    Baek, S.
    Hur, H.
    Min, B.
    Baik, S.
    Kim, N.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (05) : E167 - E168
  • [7] Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients
    M. Benjamin Hopkins
    Timothy M. Geiger
    Alva J. Bethurum
    Molly M. Ford
    Roberta L. Muldoon
    David E. Beck
    Thomas G. Stewart
    Alexander T. Hawkins
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 2613 - 2622
  • [8] Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients
    Hopkins, M. Benjamin
    Geiger, Timothy M.
    Bethurum, Alva J.
    Ford, Molly M.
    Muldoon, Roberta L.
    Beck, David E.
    Stewart, Thomas G.
    Hawkins, Alexander T.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (06): : 2613 - 2622
  • [9] Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A propensity-score matching analysis
    Chen, Tzu-Chun
    Liang, Jin-Tung
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 121 (08) : 1532 - 1540
  • [10] Comparison of symptomatic anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients
    Hidetoshi Katsuno
    Akio Shiomi
    Masaaki Ito
    Yoshikazu Koide
    Koutarou Maeda
    Toshimasa Yatsuoka
    Kazuo Hase
    Koji Komori
    Kazuhito Minami
    Kazuhiro Sakamoto
    Yoshihisa Saida
    Norio Saito
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 2848 - 2856