A comparison between antibiotic utilisation in public and private community healthcare in Malaysia

被引:1
|
作者
Lim, Audrey Huili [1 ]
Ab Rahman, Norazida [1 ]
Nasarudin, Siti Nur Su'aidah [2 ]
Velvanathan, Tineshwaran [2 ]
Fong, Mary Chok Chiew [2 ]
Mohamad Yahaya, Abdul Haniff [2 ]
Sivasampu, Sheamini [1 ]
机构
[1] NIH, Inst Clin Res, Shah Alam, Malaysia
[2] Minist Hlth, Pharmaceut Serv Programme, Pharm Res & Dev Branch, Pharm Policy & Strateg Planning Div, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
关键词
Antibiotic utilisation; Primary care; Community health; Defined daily dose; DU90; AWaRe; PHARMACIST; OVERUSE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-023-17579-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundThere are two parallel systems in Malaysian primary healthcare services: government funded public primary care and privately-owned practices. While there have been several studies evaluating antibiotic utilisation in Malaysian public healthcare, there is a lack of literature on the use of antibiotics in the private sector. There is a dire need to evaluate the more recent performance of public vs. private community healthcare in Malaysia. As such, this study aimed at measuring and comparing the utilisation of antibiotics in the public and private community healthcare sectors of Malaysia in 2018-2021.MethodsThis study was a retrospective analysis of antibiotic utilisation in Malaysian primary care for the period of 1 January 2018 until 31 December 2021 using the nationwide pharmaceutical procurement and sales data from public and private health sectors. Rates of antibiotic utilisation were reported as Defined Daily Doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID) and stratified by antibiotic classes. The secondary analysis included proportions of AWaRe antibiotic category use for each sector and proportion of antibiotic utilisation for both sectors.ResultsThe overall national antibiotic utilisation for 2018 was 6.14 DID, increasing slightly to 6.56 DID in 2019, before decreasing to 4.54 DID in 2020 and 4.17 DID in 2021. Private primary care antibiotic utilisation was almost ten times higher than in public primary care in 2021. The public sector had fewer (four) antibiotic molecules constituting 90% of the total antibiotic utilisation as compared to the private sector (eight). Use of Access antibiotics in the public sector was consistently above 90%, while use of Access category antibiotics by the private sector ranged from 64.2 to 68.3%. Although use of Watch antibiotics in the private sector decreased over the years, the use of Reserve and 'Not Recommended' antibiotics increased slightly over the years.ConclusionAntibiotic consumption in the private community healthcare sector in Malaysia is much higher than in the public sector. These findings highlight the need for more rigorous interventions targeting both private prescribers and the public with improvement strategies focusing on reducing inappropriate and unnecessary prescribing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison between antibiotic utilisation in public and private community healthcare in Malaysia
    Audrey Huili Lim
    Norazida Ab Rahman
    Siti Nur Su’aidah Nasarudin
    Tineshwaran Velvanathan
    Mary Chok Chiew Fong
    Abdul Haniff Mohamad Yahaya
    Sheamini Sivasampu
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 24
  • [2] Factors influencing public and private healthcare utilisation in Uganda
    Turyamureba, Medard
    Yawe, Bruno L.
    Oryema, John Bosco
    [J]. AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 23 (03) : 724 - 731
  • [3] Knowledge sharing of academic staff A comparison between private and public universities in Malaysia
    Chong, Chin Wei
    Yuen, Yee Yen
    Gan, Geok Chew
    [J]. LIBRARY REVIEW, 2014, 63 (03) : 203 - 223
  • [4] Comparison of stress levels between physicians working in public and private hospitals in Johor, Malaysia
    Hafiz, Amirul
    Ima-Nirwana, Soelaiman
    Chin, Kok-Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 13 (05): : 491 - 495
  • [5] A comparison study between public and private healthcare sector medicine prices in South Africa
    Thaver, Tarryn
    Padayachee, Neelaveni
    Bangalee, Varsha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 12 (02) : 194 - 205
  • [6] Pain as the fifth vital sign-A comparison between public and private healthcare systems
    Pozza, Daniel Humberto
    Azevedo, Luis Filipe
    Castro Lopes, Jose Manuel
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):
  • [7] COSTS OF MALARIA TREATMENT BETWEEN PUBLIC, COMMUNITY AND PRIVATE HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS IN SUBSIDIZED INPUT CONDITIONS
    Niangaly, Hamidou
    Thuilliez, Josselin
    Balam, Alasseini
    Sissoko, Mahamadou S.
    Sanz, Ariadna
    Djimde, Abdoulaye A.
    Doumbo, Ogobara
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2015, 93 (04): : 296 - 296
  • [8] The Asymmetric Link between Public Debt and Private Investment in Malaysia
    Lau, Siew Yee
    Tan, Ai Lian
    Liew, Chung Yee
    [J]. MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 56 (02) : 327 - 342
  • [9] A Comparison of Quality of Community Health Services Between Public and Private Community Health Centers in Urban China
    Yin, Xiaoxv
    Gong, Yanhong
    Yang, Chen
    Tu, Xiaochen
    Liu, Wei
    Cao, Shiyi
    Yang, Huajie
    Lu, Zuxun
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2015, 53 (10) : 888 - 893
  • [10] Factors Influencing Intravenous-to-Oral Antibiotic Switch among Private Healthcare Providers in Malaysia
    Chua, H. M.
    Islahudin, F.
    Tahir, N. A. Mohd
    Azman, N. J.
    Zein, Z. Wan
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 82 (04) : 698 - +