Making sense of competency-based medical education (CBME) literary conversations: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 78

被引:9
|
作者
Hamza, Deena M. M. [1 ]
Hauer, Karen E. E. [2 ]
Oswald, Anna [1 ,3 ]
van Melle, Elaine [4 ]
Ladak, Zeenat [5 ]
Zuna, Ines [6 ]
Assefa, Mekdes E. E. [7 ]
Pelletier, Gabrielle N. N. [8 ]
Sebastianski, Meghan [9 ]
Keto-Lambert, Diana [9 ]
Ross, Shelley [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Postgrad Med Educ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Med, Div Rheumatol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Royal Coll Phys & Surg Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Pediat, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[6] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Undergrad Med Educ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[7] Univ Alberta, Sch Publ Hlth, Global Hlth, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[8] Univ Alberta, Sch & Clin Child Psychol, Dept Educ Psychol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[9] Univ Alberta, Alberta Strategy Patient Oriented Res SPOR SUPPORT, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[10] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Family Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Competency-based medical education; evaluation; implementation; medical education; scoping review; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2023.2168525
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundCompetency-based medical education (CBME) received increased attention in the early 2000s by educators, clinicians, and policy makers as a way to address concerns about physician preparedness and patient safety in a rapidly changing healthcare environment. Opinions and perspectives around this shift in medical education vary and, to date, a systematic search and synthesis of the literature has yet to be undertaken. The aim of this scoping review is to present a comprehensive map of the literary conversations surrounding CBME.MethodsTwelve different databases were searched from database inception up until 29 April 2020. Literary conversations were extracted into the following categories: perceived advantages, perceived disadvantages, challenges/uncertainties/skepticism, and recommendations related to CBME.ResultsOf the 5757 identified records, 387 were included in this review. Through thematic analysis, eight themes were identified in the literary conversations about CBME: credibility, application, community influence, learner impact, assessment, educational developments, organizational structures, and societal impacts of CBME. Content analysis supported the development of a heat map that provides a visual illustration of the frequency of these literary conversations over time.ConclusionsThis review serves two purposes for the medical education research community. First, this review acts as a comprehensive historical record of the shifting perceptions of CBME as the construct was introduced and adopted by many groups in the medical education global community over time. Second, this review consolidates the many literary conversations about CBME that followed the initial proposal for this approach. These findings can facilitate understanding of CBME for multiple audiences both within and outside of the medical education research community.
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 815
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84
    Gordon, Morris
    Daniel, Michelle
    Ajiboye, Aderonke
    Uraiby, Hussein
    Xu, Nicole Y.
    Bartlett, Rangana
    Hanson, Janice
    Haas, Mary
    Spadafore, Maxwell
    Gasiea, Rayhan Yousef
    Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran
    Michie, Colin
    Corral, Janet
    Kwan, Brian
    Dolmans, Diana
    Thammasitboon, Satid
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2024, 46 (04) : 446 - 470
  • [2] An update on developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 64
    Daniel, Michelle
    Gordon, Morris
    Patricio, Madalena
    Hider, Ahmad
    Pawlik, Cameron
    Bhagdev, Rhea
    Ahmad, Shoaib
    Alston, Sebastian
    Park, Sophie
    Pawlikowska, Teresa
    Rees, Eliot
    Doyle, Andrea Jane
    Pammi, Mohan
    Thammasitboon, Satid
    Haas, Mary
    Peterson, William
    Lew, Madelyn
    Khamees, Deena
    Spadafore, Maxwell
    Clarke, Nicola
    Stojan, Jennifer
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2021, 43 (03) : 253 - 271
  • [3] An update on developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 64
    Daniel, Michelle
    Gordon, Morris
    Patricio, Madalena
    Hider, Ahmad
    Pawlik, Cameron
    Bhagdev, Rhea
    Ahmad, Shoaib
    Alston, Sebastian
    Park, Sophie
    Pawlikowska, Teresa
    Rees, Eliot
    Doyle, Andrea Jane
    Pammi, Mohan
    Thammasitboon, Satid
    Haas, Mary
    Peterson, William
    Lew, Madelyn
    Khamees, Deena
    Spadafore, Maxwell
    Clarke, Nicola
    Stojan, Jennifer
    [J]. UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 98 (03) : 68 - 70
  • [4] A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39
    Reeves, Scott
    Fletcher, Simon
    Barr, Hugh
    Birch, Ivan
    Boet, Sylvain
    Davies, Nigel
    McFadyen, Angus
    Rivera, Josette
    Kitto, Simon
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2016, 38 (07) : 656 - 668
  • [5] Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 80
    Daniel, Michelle
    Gottlieb, Michael
    Wooten, Darcy
    Stojan, Jennifer
    Haas, Mary R. C.
    Bailey, Jacob
    Evans, Sean
    Lee, Daniel
    Goldberg, Charles
    Fernandez, Jorge
    Jassal, Simerjot K.
    Rudolf, Frances
    Guluma, Kama
    Lander, Lina
    Pott, Emily
    Goldhaber, Nicole H.
    Thammasitboon, Satid
    Uraiby, Hussain
    Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran
    Gordon, Morris
    Pawlikowska, Teresa
    Corral, Janet
    Partha, Indu
    Kolman, Karyn B.
    Westrick, Jennifer
    Dolmans, Diana
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2022, 44 (12) : 1313 - 1331
  • [6] A BEME systematic review of UK undergraduate medical education in the general practice setting: BEME Guide No. 32
    Park, Sophie
    Khan, Nada F.
    Hampshire, Mandy
    Knox, Richard
    Malpass, Alice
    Thomas, James
    Anagnostelis, Betsy
    Newman, Mark
    Bower, Peter
    Rosenthal, Joe
    Murray, Elizabeth
    Iliffe, Steve
    Heneghan, Carl
    Band, Amanda
    Georgieva, Zoya
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2015, 37 (07) : 611 - 630
  • [7] Teaching professionalism in medical education: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 25
    Birden, Hudson
    Glass, Nel
    Wilson, Ian
    Harrison, Michelle
    Usherwood, Tim
    Nass, Duncan
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (07) : E1252 - E1266
  • [8] Patient/service user involvement in medical education: A best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 58
    Gordon, Morris
    Gupta, Simon
    Thornton, Debra
    Reid, Michael
    Mallen, Ernie
    Melling, Angela
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2020, 42 (01) : 4 - 16
  • [9] Utility of selection methods for specialist medical training: A BEME (best evidence medical education) systematic review: BEME guide no. 45
    Roberts, Chris
    Khanna, Priya
    Rigby, Louise
    Bartle, Emma
    Llewellyn, Anthony
    Gustavs, Julie
    Newton, Libby
    Newcombe, James P.
    Davies, Mark
    Thistlethwaite, Jill
    Lynam, James
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2018, 40 (01) : 3 - 19
  • [10] Components of interprofessional education programs in neonatal medicine: A focused BEME review: BEME Guide No. 73
    Parmekar, S.
    Shah, R.
    Gokulakrishnan, G.
    Gowda, S.
    Castillo, D.
    Iniguez, S.
    Gallegos, J.
    Sisson, A.
    Thammasitboon, S.
    Pammi, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2022, 44 (08) : 823 - 835