Forecasting Bitcoin with technical analysis: A not-so-random forest?

被引:36
|
作者
Gradojevic, Nikola [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kukolj, Dragan [2 ]
Adcock, Robert [1 ]
Djakovic, Vladimir [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Lang Sch Business & Econ, Guelph, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Tech Sci, Novi Sad, Serbia
[3] Univ Guelph, Lang Sch Business & Econ, Dept Econ & Finance, 50 Stone Rd, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
Bitcoin; Deep learning; Random forest; Forecasting; Technical analysis; Market sentiment; HEDGING DERIVATIVE SECURITIES; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; TRADING RULES; VOLATILITY; RETURNS; PREDICT; UNCERTAINTY; SENTIMENT; PATTERNS; DOLLAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.08.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper uses data sampled at hourly and daily frequencies to predict Bitcoin returns. We consider various advanced non-linear models based on a multitude of popular technical indicators that represent market trend, momentum, volume, and sentiment. We run a robust empirical exercise to observe the impact of forecast horizon, model type, time period, and the choice of inputs (predictors) on the forecast performance of the competing models. We find that Bitcoin prices are weakly efficient at the hourly frequency. In contrast, technical analysis combined with non-linear forecasting models becomes statistically significantly dominant relative to the random walk model on a daily horizon. Our comparative analysis identifies the random forest model as the most accurate at predicting Bitcoin. The estimated measures of the relative importance of predictors reveal that the nature of investing in the Bitcoin market evolved from trend-following to excessive momentum and sentiment in the most recent time period. (c) 2021 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Random and not-so-random codes for quantum channels
    Winter, Andreas
    Proceedings of 2006 IEEE Information Theory Workshop, 2006, : 154 - 154
  • [2] The Not-so-Random Drunkard's Walk
    Ehrhardt, George
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICS EDUCATION, 2013, 21 (02):
  • [3] Not-so-random genetic variation in diverse biological settings
    Fox, JL
    ASM NEWS, 2000, 66 (05): : 266 - 267
  • [4] Heads or tails - random and not-so-random factors that influence dog lifespan
    Urfer, S. R.
    Promislow, D. E. L.
    Kaeberlein, M.
    Creevy, K. E.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 61 : E920 - E921
  • [5] Not-So-Random Numbers in Virtualized Linux and the Whirlwind RNG
    Everspaugh, Adam
    Zhai, Yan
    Jellinek, Robert
    Ristenpart, Thomas
    Swift, Michael
    2014 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (SP 2014), 2014, : 559 - 574
  • [6] Not-So-Random Errors: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not the Only Evidence of the Value of PET
    Hicks, Rodney J.
    Ware, Robert E.
    Hofman, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (11) : 1820 - 1822
  • [7] The basic inspection kit: Some not-so-random thoughts on stuff we take for granted
    Powitz, RW
    Balsamo, JJ
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1999, 61 (06) : 34 - 35
  • [8] Not-So-Random Errors: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not the Only Evidence of the Value of PET REPLY
    Scheibler, Fueloep
    Zumbe, Polina
    Janssen, Inger
    Viebahn, Melanie
    Schroer-Guenther, Milly
    Grosselfinger, Robert
    Hausner, Elke
    Sauerland, Stefan
    Lange, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (11) : 1822 - 1824
  • [9] Not-so-random forests: Comparing voting and decision tree ensembles for characterizing partial harvest events
    Pasquarella, Valerie J.
    Morreale, Luca L.
    Brown, Christopher F.
    Kilbride, John B.
    Thompson, Jonathan R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2023, 125
  • [10] Air Pollution Forecasting with Random Forest Time Series Analysis
    Altincop, Hilmi
    Oktay, Ayse Betul
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA PROCESSING (IDAP), 2018,