Twenty-Year Radiographic Outcomes Following Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Foley, David P. [1 ,4 ]
Sasso, Willa R. [2 ]
Ye, Jason Y. [3 ]
Vinayek, Sheetal [3 ]
Smucker, Joseph D. [3 ]
Mccarthy, Michael H. [3 ]
Boody, Barrett S. [3 ]
Sasso, Rick C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Spine Grp, Carmel, IN USA
[4] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
cervical; arthroplasty; discectomy; fusion; radiographic; long-term; outcomes; ACDF; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; FUSION; MULTICENTER; DISKECTOMY; ADJACENT; TRIAL; DECOMPRESSION; DEGENERATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000004888
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design.Prospective randomized controlled trial. Objective.Compare range of motion (ROM) and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at 20-year follow-up. Summary of Background Data.Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is the standard of treatment for single-level cervical disc degeneration causing radiculopathy. CDA is claimed to reduce shear strain, and adjacent-level ROM changes are hypothesized to hasten ASD with ACDF. Materials and Methods.This study collected data on 47 patients randomized to ACDF or CDA. Lateral cervical spine radiographs were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 20 years for alignment, ROM, ASD, and heterotopic ossification. Results.Eighty-two percent (18/22) of CDA patients and 84% (21/25) of ACDF patients followed up at 20 years. At 20 years, total cervical (C2-C7) ROM was statistically different between the CDA and fusion groups (47.8 degrees vs. 33.4 degrees, P=0.005). Total cervical ROM was not significantly different between preoperative and 20-year periods following CDA (45.6 degrees vs. 47.4 degrees, P=0.772) or ACDF (40.6 degrees vs. 33.0 degrees, P=0.192). Differences in postoperative and 20-year index-level ROM following CDA were not significant (10.1 degrees vs. 10.2 degrees, P=0.952). Final ASD grading was statistically lower following CDA versus ACDF at both adjacent levels (P<0.005). Twenty-year adjacent-level ossification development was increased following ACDF versus CDA (P<0.001). Polyethylene mean thickness decreased from 9.4 mm immediately postoperatively to 9.1 mm at 20-year follow up (P=0.013). Differences in adjacent-level ROM from preoperative to 20-year follow-up in both the ACDF and CDA groups did not meet statistical significance (P>0.05). Conclusions.Cervical disc arthroplasty maintains index-level and total cervical ROM with very long-term follow-up. Total cervical ROM was higher at 20 years in CDA relative to ACDF. CDA results in lower rates of ASD and adjacent-level ossification development than ACDF.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 303
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Tracey, Robert W.
    Kang, Daniel G.
    Cody, John P.
    Wagner, Scott C.
    Rosner, Michael K.
    Lehman, Ronald A., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (11) : 1905 - 1908
  • [2] Comparison of Outcomes of Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion and Single-Level Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement for Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
    Pandey, Praveen Kumar
    Pawar, Inder
    Gupta, Jyoti
    Verma, Raaghav Rai
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (01) : E41 - E49
  • [3] Arthroplasty versus fusion for single-level cervical disc disease
    Karabag, Hamza
    Cakmak, Erkan
    Celik, Bahattin
    Iplikcioglu, Ahmet Celal
    Soran, Ahmet Faruk
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (12) : 1348 - 1351
  • [4] Cervical disc arthroplasty: 10-year outcomes of the Prestige LP cervical disc at a single level
    Gornet, Matthew F.
    Burkus, J. Kenneth
    Shaffrey, Mark E.
    Schranck, Francine W.
    Copay, Anne G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (03) : 317 - 325
  • [5] Dynamic simulation of cervical spine following single-level cervical disc replacement
    de Jongh, Cornel U.
    Basson, Anton H.
    Scheffer, Cornie
    2007 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-16, 2007, : 4289 - 4292
  • [6] Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review of Single-Level, Multilevel, and Hybrid Procedures
    Laratta, Joseph L.
    Shillingford, Jamal N.
    Saifi, Comron
    Riew, K. Daniel
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (01) : 78 - 83
  • [7] Influence of Surgeon Specialty on 30-day Outcomes Following Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
    Gupta, Puneet
    Hassan, Fthimnir M.
    Thomas, George M.
    Lombardi, Joseph M.
    Sardar, Zeeshan M.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (04) : 1257 - 1268
  • [8] Cochrane in CORR A® : Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
    Evaniew, Nathan
    Madden, Kim
    Bhandari, Mohit
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (03) : 802 - 808
  • [9] Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease A Cochrane Review
    Boselie, Toon F. M.
    Willems, Paul C.
    van Mameren, Henk
    de Bie, Rob A.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (17) : E1096 - E1107
  • [10] The Occupational Impact of Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in an Active Duty Military Population
    Cleveland, Andrew
    Herzog, Josh
    Caram, Pedro
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2015, 180 (11) : 1196 - 1198