Comparison of Cancer Mortality and Incidence Between New Zealand and Australia and Reflection on Differences in Cancer Care: An Ecological Cross-Sectional Study of 2014-2018

被引:3
|
作者
Aye, Phyu Sin [1 ,2 ]
Win, Shwe Sin [1 ]
Tin Tin, Sandar [1 ]
Elwood, J. Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, 85 Pk Rd, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
关键词
cancer mortality; cancer incidence; cancer care; comparison; New Zealand; Australia; LUNG-CANCER; SURVIVAL; REDUCTIONS; MANAGEMENT; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1177/10732748231152330
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundDespite many background similarities, New Zealand showed excess cancer deaths compared to Australia in previous studies. This study extends this comparison using the most recent data of 2014-2018.MethodsThis study used publicly available cancer mortality and incidence data of New Zealand Ministry of Health and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, and resident population data of Statistics New Zealand. Australian cancer mortality and incidence rates were applied to New Zealand population, by site of cancer, year, age and sex, to estimate the expected numbers, which were compared with the New Zealand observed numbers.ResultsFor total cancers in 2014-2018, New Zealand had 780 excess deaths in women (17.1% of the annual total 4549; 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.8-18.4%), and 281 excess deaths in men (5.5% of the annual total 5105; 95% CI 4.3-6.7%) compared to Australia. The excess was contributed by many major cancers including colorectal, melanoma, and stomach cancer in both sexes; lung, uterine, and breast cancer in women, and prostate cancer in men. New Zealand's total cancer incidences were lower than those expected from Australia's in both women and men: average annual difference of 419 cases (-3.6% of the annual total 11 505; 95% CI -4.5 to -2.8%), and 1485 (-11.7% of the annual total 12 669; 95% CI -12.5 to -10.9%), respectively. Comparing time periods, the excesses in total cancer deaths in women were 15.1% in 2000-07, and 17.5% in 1996-1997; and in men 4.7% in 2000-2007 and 5.6% in 1996-1997. The differences by time period were non-significant.ConclusionExcess mortality from all cancers combined and several common cancers in New Zealand, compared to Australia, persisted in 2014-2018, being similar to excesses in 2000-2007 and 1996-1997. It cannot be explained by differences in incidence, but may be attributable to various aspects of health systems governance and performance.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of cancer mortality and incidence in New Zealand and Australia
    Skegg, DCG
    McCredie, MR
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 115 (1153) : 205 - 208
  • [2] Socioeconomic factors and cancer incidence, mortality, and survival in a metropolitan area of Japan: A cross-sectional ecological study
    Ueda, K
    Tsukuma, H
    Ajiki, W
    Oshima, A
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2005, 96 (10) : 684 - 688
  • [3] Disparity in cancer survivorship care: A cross-sectional study of telehealth use among cancer nurses in Australia
    Brunelli, Vanessa N.
    Fox, Jennifer A.
    Langbecker, Danette H.
    COLLEGIAN, 2021, 28 (05) : 498 - 505
  • [4] Socio-economic factors related to premature death from colorectal cancer in Santiago de Chile, 2014-2018: a cross-sectional study
    Guerrero-Nancuante, C.
    Eguiguren, P.
    Bass, C.
    Garmendia, M. L.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 231 : 1 - 6
  • [5] Exploring regional disparities in lung cancer mortality in a Brazilian state: A cross-sectional ecological study
    Marques, Vlaudimir Dias
    Massago, Miyoko
    da Silva, Mariana Teixeira
    Roskowski, Igor
    de Lima, Daniel Augusto Nunes
    dos Santos, Lander
    Louro, Estela
    Goncalves, Simone Tomas
    Pedroso, Raissa Bocchi
    Obale, Armstrong Mbi
    Pelloso, Sandra Marisa
    Vissoci, Joao Ricardo Nickenig
    Staton, Catherine Ann
    Nihei, Oscar Kenji
    Carvalho, Maria Dalva de Barros
    Dutra, Amanda de Carvalho
    de Andrade, Luciano
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (06):
  • [6] Association Between Cancer and Cardiovascular Toxicity: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study on NHANES 1999–2018
    Ruihuan Shen
    Tong Zou
    Cardiovascular Toxicology, 2024, 24 : 351 - 364
  • [7] Protocol for the avatar acceptability study: a multiperspective cross-sectional study evaluating the acceptability of using patient-derived xenografts to guide personalised cancer care in Australia and New Zealand
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    Doolan, Emma L.
    Fardell, Joanna E.
    Signorelli, Christina
    Quinn, Veronica F.
    Tucker, Kathy F.
    Patenaude, Andrea F.
    Marshall, Glenn M.
    Lock, Richard B.
    Georgiou, Gabrielle
    Cohn, Richard J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (08):
  • [8] Incidence Correlation Between Different Diseases and Lung Cancer: A Global Cross-Sectional and Timeseries Study
    Li, J.
    Wang, R.
    Cheng, B.
    He, J.
    Liang, W.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 19 (10) : S419 - S420
  • [9] Differences in functioning between young adults with cancer and older age groups: A cross-sectional study
    Andersen, Nanna Hejselbaek
    Christiansen, Josephine Aagesen
    la Cour, Karen
    Aagesen, Maria
    Tang, Lars Hermann
    Joergensen, Dorthe Soested
    Pilegaard, Marc Sampedro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (06)
  • [10] Differences in health care experiences between rare cancer and common cancer patients: results from a national cross-sectional survey
    Eline de Heus
    Vivian Engelen
    Irene Dingemans
    Carol Richel
    Marga Schrieks
    Jan Maarten van der Zwan
    Marc G. Besselink
    Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen
    Carla M. L. van Herpen
    Saskia F. A. Duijts
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 16