Luzon predators: Clues from a fossil with bite marks

被引:0
|
作者
Tablizo, Meyrick U. [1 ]
Volmer, Rebekka [2 ,3 ]
Fernando, Allan Gil S. [1 ]
Rofes, Juan C. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Philippines Diliman, Natl Inst Geol Sci, Coll Sci, Nannoworks Lab, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
[2] Ateneo Manila Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, Quezon City 1108, Philippines
[3] Senckenberg Forschungsinst & Naturmuseum Frankfur, Role Culture Early Expans Humans ROCEEH, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Univ Philippines Diliman, Sch Archaeol, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
[5] MNHN, Archeozool Archeobotan Soc Prat & Environnements, CNRS, UMR 7209, F-75005 Paris, France
[6] Natl Museum Philippines, Manila 1000, Philippines
来源
ANNALES DE PALEONTOLOGIE | 2023年 / 109卷 / 04期
关键词
Luzon; Pleistocene; Bite marks; Taphonomy; SOUTHEAST-ASIA; CARNIVORE TAXA; MAMMAL BONE; PLEISTOCENE; ISLAND; PHILIPPINES; EVOLUTION; TAPHONOMY; PALAWAN; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.annpal.2023.102649
中图分类号
Q91 [古生物学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 070903 ;
摘要
Luzon Island remained isolated throughout its emergent history with its paleofauna often considered depauperate. However, the terrestrial vertebrate fossil record of the island is still poorly known. A new fossil-bearing paleochannel deposit was discovered in La Union Province, northwestern Luzon, Philippines. This paleochannel is inferred to be of Pleistocene age and has yielded fossils tentatively classified as a bovid (Bubalus sp.), a cervid (Rusa sp.), a suid (Sus sp.), and a large crocodile (Crocodylidae). Interestingly, a proximal fragment of the left tibia of a cervid shows multiple bite marks. This study analyzes the bite marks and modifications on the specimen to infer its possible trace maker and explore its implications in understanding the ancient predatory guild of Luzon. Three sets of modifications were recognized on the specimen, namely the bite marks, the broken proximal end and the dry bone fractures. A crocodilian agent for the bite marks is supported by the bisections, their occurrence in the paleofaunal assemblage and the fluvial setting of the deposit. However, an unknown carnivoran agent interpretation cannot be fully disregarded given the ambiguity of bisected marks and the possibly gnawed proximal end of the specimen. Unfortunately, given the lack of in situ context and apparent overprinting, the extent of the peri- and post-mortem modification remains uncertain which hinders the identification of the predatory agent. Verification of the observations reported in this study would require the systematic collection and detailed taphonomic analysis of additional fossil specimens from the deposit. (c) 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条