The Economics of Natural Gas Flaring and Methane Emissions in US Shale: An Agenda for Research and Policy

被引:3
|
作者
Agerton, Mark [1 ,2 ]
Gilbert, Ben [3 ,4 ]
Upton Jr, Gregory B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Rice Univ, Baker Inst Publ Policy, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[3] Colorado Sch Mines, Div Econ & Business, Golden, CO USA
[4] Colorado Sch Mines, Payne Inst Publ Policy, Golden, CO USA
[5] Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Energy Studies, Baton Rouge, LA USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Q35; Q48; Q53; Q54; BLACK CARBON; OIL; LEAKAGE; CONSEQUENCES; REDUCTIONS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1086/725004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Natural gas flaring and methane emissions (F & M) are linked environmental issues for US shale oil and gas operations. Flaring refers to burning natural gas when regulatory, infrastructure, and market constraints make it infeasible to capture it when drilling for oil. In this paper, we lay out an agenda for researchers and policy makers. We describe why F & M are linked, both physically and in terms of policy. Following an interdisciplinary literature review on measurement of F & M, we marshal detailed industry data to identify constraints in the natural gas system that are correlated with upstream F & M. We then discuss the economic and physical causes of F & M. Moving on to the external costs imposed by F & M, we calculate that the climate costs of estimated methane emissions are an order of magnitude larger than the climate costs of reported flaring after accounting for hydrocarbon content and flare efficiency. Finally, we discuss both existing policies and economic insights relevant to future policies.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 273
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimate of methane emissions from the US natural gas industry
    Kirchgessner, DA
    Lott, RA
    Cowgill, RM
    Harrison, MR
    Shires, TM
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 1997, 35 (06) : 1365 - 1390
  • [2] Natural gas supply concernslop US energy policy agenda
    Lorenzetti, M
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2003, 101 (27) : 30 - 32
  • [3] Allocating Methane Emissions to Natural Gas and Oil Production from Shale Formations
    Zavala-Araiza, Daniel
    Allen, David T.
    Harrison, Matthew
    George, Fiji C.
    Jersey, Gilbert R.
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2015, 3 (03): : 492 - 498
  • [4] On methane emissions from shale gas development
    Umeozor, Evar C.
    Jordaan, Sarah M.
    Gates, Ian D.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 152 : 594 - 600
  • [5] System-wide and Superemitter Policy Options for the Abatement of Methane Emissions from the US Natural Gas System
    Mayfield, Erin N.
    Robinson, Allen L.
    Cohon, Jared L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (09) : 4772 - 4780
  • [6] Anthropogenic and natural methane emissions from a shale gas exploration area of Quebec, Canada
    Pinti, Daniele L.
    Gelinas, Yves
    Moritz, Anja M.
    Larocque, Marie
    Sano, Yuji
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 566 : 1329 - 1338
  • [7] Methane emissions make shale gas a bridge to nowhere
    Howarth, Robert
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [8] Closing the methane gap in US oil and natural gas production emissions inventories
    Rutherford, Jeffrey S.
    Sherwin, Evan D.
    Ravikumar, Arvind P.
    Heath, Garvin A.
    Englander, Jacob
    Cooley, Daniel
    Lyon, David
    Omara, Mark
    Langfitt, Quinn
    Brandt, Adam R.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [9] Closing the methane gap in US oil and natural gas production emissions inventories
    Jeffrey S. Rutherford
    Evan D. Sherwin
    Arvind P. Ravikumar
    Garvin A. Heath
    Jacob Englander
    Daniel Cooley
    David Lyon
    Mark Omara
    Quinn Langfitt
    Adam R. Brandt
    [J]. Nature Communications, 12
  • [10] Black Carbon Emissions from Associated Natural Gas Flaring
    Weyant, Cheryl L.
    Shepson, Paul B.
    Subramanian, R.
    Cambaliza, Maria O. L.
    Heimburger, Alexie
    McCabe, David
    Baum, Ellen
    Stirm, Brian H.
    Bone, Tami C.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (04) : 2075 - 2081